Should Policy Makers Worry about Asymmetries in the Business Cycle?
This paper reconsiders the conventional use of econometric models, especially identified vector autoregressive models, in guiding monetary policy. The main question I explore is whether these models are seriously flawed because they ignore asymmetries in the business cycles. Toward that end, models that allow for asymmetric business cyclesÑdefined by the case where recessions and expansions are not mirror images of each otherÑare estimated. The results suggest that policy makers should worry about asymmetries in business cycles because most econometric models cannot capture empirically important asymmetries. In particular, estimated multiregime models show that the effects of monetary policy are stronger during turning points and outright recessions than in expansions. I conclude that the symmetry/asymmetry question has as much, and maybe even more, practical significance than debates over identification assumptions that have influenced much of the empirical macroeconomic literature over the past 20 years.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 3 (1999)
Issue (Month): 4 (January)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.degruyter.com |
|Order Information:||Web: http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/snde|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:sndecm:v:3:y:1999:i:4:n:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Peter Golla)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.