IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/nonpfo/v13y2022i1p49-68n4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Charitable Organizations in Singapore: From Clan Based to State Facilitated Endeavors

Author

Listed:
  • Tang Hang Wu

    (Singapore Management University, Singapore, 188065, Singapore)

Abstract

Singapore, with a five million population, has a vibrant charitable sector with over 2000 registered charities attracting approximately USD$2.18 billion in annual donations. How did Singapore’s charitable sector achieve its current level when it has been, in the past, segregated along mainly religious, race and clan-based communities? This paper explores this question by piecing together the current ecosystem, regulatory and tax infrastructure which facilitates the charitable sector in Singapore. Central to the development of the charitable sector has been the Singapore government’s role of being a gatekeeper, regulator and enabler of charities. In analysing the government’s role in the charitable sector, this paper locates Singapore’s charitable sector within the literature on government and nonprofit organization relations which has been described at times being cooperative, complementary, confrontational, and co-optive. These astute observations ring true with respect to the Singapore government’s relationship with the charitable sector. For organizations which pursue purposes consistent with state’s vision of public good, the state’s relationship with these charities has been largely cooperative and complementary. However, even within charities considered by the state to further public good, there is a strong element of co-optation where the state wields significant direct and indirect power over the charitable sector by way of provision of funding and board composition. In contrast, nonprofit organizations which engage in aims inconsistent with the state’s perceived public interest are, by law, unable to register itself as charities and enjoy corresponding fiscal benefits. Such nonprofit organizations also typically do not receive state funding. This demonstrates the confrontational nature of the state’s relationship with these nonprofit organizations. Through a close analysis of the laws, codes, media reports and academic literature on the charitable sector, the central thesis of this paper is that the charitable sector in Singapore is essentially a state facilitated endeavor.

Suggested Citation

  • Tang Hang Wu, 2022. "Charitable Organizations in Singapore: From Clan Based to State Facilitated Endeavors," Nonprofit Policy Forum, De Gruyter, vol. 13(1), pages 49-68, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:nonpfo:v:13:y:2022:i:1:p:49-68:n:4
    DOI: 10.1515/npf-2021-0032
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/npf-2021-0032
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/npf-2021-0032?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. ., 2019. "Setting the Stage," Chapters, in: Deglobalization 2.0, chapter 2, pages 13-44, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Boeri,Tito & Cozzolino,Maria & Di Porto,Edoardo, 2019. "Setting Up a Communication Package for the Italian NDC," Social Protection Discussion Papers and Notes 136554, The World Bank.
    3. ., 2019. "Setting the scene," Chapters, in: Cultural Heritage, Creativity and Economic Development, chapter 1, pages 1-11, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barr, Nicholas, 2019. "Gender and family: conceptual overview," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 101237, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Mohd Azam, Siti Balqis & Abu Bakar, Siti Hajar & Mohd Yusoff, Jal Zabdi & Abdul Rauf, Siti Hajar, 2021. "A case study on academic and vocational training for child offenders undergoing a multisystemic therapy-based rehabilitation order in Malaysia," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    3. Leong, Rachel A.T. & Fung, Tze Kwan & Sachidhanandam, Uma & Drillet, Zuzana & Edwards, Peter J. & Richards, Daniel R., 2020. "Use of structural equation modeling to explore influences on perceptions of ecosystem services and disservices attributed to birds in Singapore," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    4. Daniele Franco & Pietro Tommasino, 2020. "Lessons From Italy: A Good Pension System Needs an Effective Broader Social Policy Framework," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 55(2), pages 73-81, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:nonpfo:v:13:y:2022:i:1:p:49-68:n:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.