IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/bistud/v3y2008i3n7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Institutionalizing the Universal Caretaker Through a Basic Income?

Author

Listed:
  • Zelleke Almaz

    (The New School)

Abstract

Feminists should endorse a basic income, particularly in comparison to other feasible safety-net alternatives, including work-conditioned benefits and a caregiver stipend. A basic income promotes gender equality by creating the social and economic conditions required to reduce the gendered division of labor. Most importantly, a universal, unconditional basic income could greatly reduce the poverty rate of the most vulnerable group in capitalist economies: single women and their children. For this reason if for no other, feminists should endorse a basic income.

Suggested Citation

  • Zelleke Almaz, 2008. "Institutionalizing the Universal Caretaker Through a Basic Income?," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 3(3), pages 1-9, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:bistud:v:3:y:2008:i:3:n:7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/bis.2008.3.3/bis.2008.3.3.1133/bis.2008.3.3.1133.xml?format=INT
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gwendolyn Mink, 1995. "Wage work, family work, and welfare politics," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(2), pages 95-98.
    2. Barbara Bergmann, 2000. "Subsidizing Child Care by Mothers at Home," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 77-88.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Robeyns Ingrid, 2008. "Introduction: Revisiting the Feminism and Basic Income Debate," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 3(3), pages 1-6, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:bistud:v:3:y:2008:i:3:n:7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Peter Golla). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.