IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/bejeap/v22y2022i2p389-398n6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Familiarity and Race Bias: Evidence from a Television Competition (and the Case for More Women Judges?)

Author

Listed:
  • Chong Bruno Z.
  • Chong Marco Z.

    (Bethesda-Chevy Chase HS, Bethesda, MD20814, USA)

Abstract

While social interaction is claimed to help reduce racial bias, the evidence is mixed. We argue that not only interaction, but familiarity among agents may help reduce race bias. We use new data from MasterChef, a nationally syndicated television competition that cover 10 years. We find that familiarity does not help reduce race bias. When judges are all Caucasian they appear to favor Caucasian contestants and set back minority contestants in the final placements. Interestingly, we find an analogous finding with minority judges. Female judges are the only ones who show no bias.

Suggested Citation

  • Chong Bruno Z. & Chong Marco Z., 2022. "Familiarity and Race Bias: Evidence from a Television Competition (and the Case for More Women Judges?)," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 22(2), pages 389-398, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:bejeap:v:22:y:2022:i:2:p:389-398:n:6
    DOI: 10.1515/bejeap-2022-0058
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2022-0058
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/bejeap-2022-0058?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    race bias; television; competition; judges; females; minorities;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J71 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor Discrimination - - - Hiring and Firing
    • J79 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor Discrimination - - - Other
    • Z19 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:bejeap:v:22:y:2022:i:2:p:389-398:n:6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.