IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/apjrin/v4y2009i1n1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison between Financial Theory and Cooperative Game Theory in Risk Capital Allocation

Author

Listed:
  • Seog S. Hun

    (Seoul National University)

  • Shin Sungwhee

    (University of Seoul)

Abstract

We compare two prominent approaches to capital allocation in insurance firms. The financial theory approach includes Merton and Perold (1993) and Myers and Read (2001). The cooperative game theory approach utilizes concepts such as the Shapley value and the Aumann-Shapley value. We argue that, when an entire division is added or when the effect of a decision is discrete, the Shapley value approach provides an improvement over the Merton and Perold approach in that it properly accounts for the order in which divisions are added, and resoles the unallocated capital problem. When the effect of a decision is continuous, we show that the Auman-Shapley value approach not only provides game theoretic support for, but also conceptually extends, the Myers and Read approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Seog S. Hun & Shin Sungwhee, 2009. "Comparison between Financial Theory and Cooperative Game Theory in Risk Capital Allocation," Asia-Pacific Journal of Risk and Insurance, De Gruyter, vol. 4(1), pages 1-18, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:apjrin:v:4:y:2009:i:1:n:1
    DOI: 10.2202/2153-3792.1047
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2202/2153-3792.1047
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2202/2153-3792.1047?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Powers, 2007. "Using Aumann-Shapley Values to Allocate Insurance Risk," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(3), pages 113-127.
    2. Gary Venter, 2004. "Capital Allocation Survey with Commentary," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 96-107.
    3. Tsanakas, Andreas & Barnett, Christopher, 2003. "Risk capital allocation and cooperative pricing of insurance liabilities," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 239-254, October.
    4. Stephen Mildenhall, 2004. "A Note on the Myers and Read Capital Allocation Formula," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 32-44.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. van Gulick, Gerwald & De Waegenaere, Anja & Norde, Henk, 2012. "Excess based allocation of risk capital," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 26-42.
    2. Kim, Joseph H.T. & Hardy, Mary R., 2009. "A capital allocation based on a solvency exchange option," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 357-366, June.
    3. van Gulick, G. & De Waegenaere, A.M.B. & Norde, H.W., 2010. "Excess Based Allocation of Risk Capital," Other publications TiSEM f9231521-fea7-4524-8fea-8, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    4. George Zanjani, 2010. "An Economic Approach to Capital Allocation," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 77(3), pages 523-549, September.
    5. Kull, Andreas, 2009. "Sharing Risk – An Economic Perspective," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 39(2), pages 591-613, November.
    6. Furman, Edward & Zitikis, Ricardas, 2008. "Weighted risk capital allocations," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 263-269, October.
    7. Furman, Edward & Kuznetsov, Alexey & Zitikis, Ričardas, 2018. "Weighted risk capital allocations in the presence of systematic risk," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 75-81.
    8. Boonen, Tim J. & De Waegenaere, Anja & Norde, Henk, 2020. "A generalization of the Aumann–Shapley value for risk capital allocation problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(1), pages 277-287.
    9. Stephen J. Mildenhall, 2017. "Actuarial Geometry," Risks, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-44, June.
    10. Alexandru V. Asimit & Raluca Vernic & Riċardas Zitikis, 2013. "Evaluating Risk Measures and Capital Allocations Based on Multi-Losses Driven by a Heavy-Tailed Background Risk: The Multivariate Pareto-II Model," Risks, MDPI, vol. 1(1), pages 1-20, March.
    11. Mohammed, Nawaf & Furman, Edward & Su, Jianxi, 2021. "Can a regulatory risk measure induce profit-maximizing risk capital allocations? The case of conditional tail expectation," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(PB), pages 425-436.
    12. Nawaf Mohammed & Edward Furman & Jianxi Su, 2021. "Can a regulatory risk measure induce profit-maximizing risk capital allocations? The case of Conditional Tail Expectation," Papers 2102.05003, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2021.
    13. Björn Häckel, 2010. "Risikoadjustierte Wertbeiträge zur ex ante Entscheidungsunterstützung: Ein axiomatischer Ansatz," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 81-108, June.
    14. Hirbod Assa & Manuel Morales & Hassan Omidi Firouzi, 2016. "On the Capital Allocation Problem for a New Coherent Risk Measure in Collective Risk Theory," Risks, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-20, August.
    15. Quigley, John & Walls, Lesley, 2007. "Trading reliability targets within a supply chain using Shapley's value," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(10), pages 1448-1457.
    16. Hougaard, Jens Leth & Smilgins, Aleksandrs, 2016. "Risk capital allocation with autonomous subunits: The Lorenz set," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 151-157.
    17. Christoph Frei, 2020. "A New Approach to Risk Attribution and Its Application in Credit Risk Analysis," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-13, June.
    18. Tsanakas, Andreas, 2009. "To split or not to split: Capital allocation with convex risk measures," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 268-277, April.
    19. Major, John A., 2018. "Distortion measures and homogeneous financial derivatives," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 82-91.
    20. Riccardo Colini-Baldeschi & Marco Scarsini & Stefano Vaccari, 2018. "Variance Allocation and Shapley Value," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 919-933, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:apjrin:v:4:y:2009:i:1:n:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.