IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/sysdyn/v39y2023i3p277-294.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Never the strongest: reconciling the four schools of thought in system dynamics in the debate on quality

Author

Listed:
  • Timothy Clancy
  • Saeed P. Langarudi
  • Raafat Zaini

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Timothy Clancy & Saeed P. Langarudi & Raafat Zaini, 2023. "Never the strongest: reconciling the four schools of thought in system dynamics in the debate on quality," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 39(3), pages 277-294, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:sysdyn:v:39:y:2023:i:3:p:277-294
    DOI: 10.1002/sdr.1740
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.1740
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sdr.1740?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jorgen Randers, 2019. "The great challenge for system dynamics on the path forward: implementation and real impact," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 35(1), pages 19-24, January.
    2. Jack B. Homer & George P. Richardson, 2017. "On the growth of the system dynamics field," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 33(3-4), pages 336-346, July.
    3. Bradley Morrison, 2019. "Opportunities and risks on the path forward for system dynamics," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 35(1), pages 25-34, January.
    4. Edward G. Anderson, 2019. "Applying Sterman's proposed principles of modeling rigor to hybrid models combining multiple simulation methods," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 35(1), pages 8-14, January.
    5. John Sterman, 2018. "System dynamics at sixty: the path forward," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 34(1-2), pages 5-47, January.
    6. G P Richardson, 1999. "Reflections for the future of system dynamics," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 50(4), pages 440-449, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohammad S. Jalali & Hesam Mahmoudi, 2024. "In response to: “Never the strongest: reconciling the four schools of thought in system dynamics in the debate on quality” — beyond pragmatism," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 40(2), April.
    2. Luis F. Luna‐Reyes, 2024. "In response to: “Never the strongest: reconciling the four schools of thought in system dynamics in the debate on quality.” — Acknowledging our differences makes us all stronger," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 40(2), April.
    3. Asmeret Naugle & Saeed Langarudi & Timothy Clancy, 2024. "What is (quantitative) system dynamics modeling? Defining characteristics and the opportunities they create," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 40(2), April.
    4. Caroline Green & Berend Beishuizen & Mart Stein & Chantal P. Rovers & Alma Tostmann & Daan L. K. de Jong & Claudia Houareau & Knut Perseke & Clara Spieker & Ulrike Grote & Patrick Csornai & Carlos Tig, 2024. "Using system dynamics to support a functional exercise for pandemic preparedness and response," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 40(3), July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Negar Darabi & Niyousha Hosseinichimeh, 2020. "System dynamics modeling in health and medicine: a systematic literature review," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 36(1), pages 29-73, January.
    2. Igor Krejčí & Pavel Moulis & Jana Pitrová & Ivana Tichá & Ladislav Pilař & Jan Rydval, 2019. "Traps and Opportunities of Czech Small-Scale Beef Cattle Farming," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-26, August.
    3. Andrada Tomoaia‐Cotisel & Samuel D. Allen & Hyunjung Kim & David F. Andersen & Nabeel Qureshi & Zaid Chalabi, 2024. "Are we there yet? Saturation analysis as a foundation for confidence in system dynamics modeling, applied to a conceptualization process using qualitative data," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 40(4), October.
    4. Ellis Ballard & Kelsey Werner & Pratiti Priyadarshini, 2021. "Boundary objects in translation: the role of language in participatory system dynamics modeling," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 37(4), pages 310-332, October.
    5. Laura J. Black & Donald R. Greer, 2024. "Minding the abstraction gap: approaches supporting implementation," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 40(4), October.
    6. Andrada Tomoaia‐Cotisel & Samuel D. Allen & Hyunjung Kim & David Andersen & Zaid Chalabi, 2022. "Rigorously interpreted quotation analysis for evaluating causal loop diagrams in late‐stage conceptualization," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 38(1), pages 41-80, January.
    7. Hugo Herrera & Nuno Videira & Hubert P.L.M. Korzilius & Kathya Lorena Cordova‐Pozo & Marleen H.F. McCardle‐Keurentjes, 2022. "Reflecting on factors influencing long‐lasting organisational effects of group model‐building interventions," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 38(2), pages 190-209, April.
    8. Chen, Junjie & Liu, Pei & Lin, Borong & Zhou, Hao & Papachristos, George, 2025. "The diffusion of prefabrication technology and its potential for CO2 emissions reduction in China: A combined system dynamics and agent-based study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    9. Claire F. Brereton & Paul Jagals, 2021. "Applications of Systems Science to Understand and Manage Multiple Influences within Children’s Environmental Health in Least Developed Countries: A Causal Loop Diagram Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-23, March.
    10. Benjamin L. Turner & Melissa Wuellner & Erin Cortus & Steven Boot Chumbley, 2022. "A multi‐university cohort model for teaching complex and interdisciplinary problem‐solving using system dynamics," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(2), pages 185-199, March.
    11. Wang, Fengquan & Jiang, Jihai & Cosenz, Federico, 2025. "Understanding data-driven business model innovation in complexity: A system dynamics approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    12. Sergey Naumov & David R. Keith & Charles H. Fine, 2020. "Unintended Consequences of Automated Vehicles and Pooling for Urban Transportation Systems," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(5), pages 1354-1371, May.
    13. Lopes, Rita & Videira, Nuno, 2017. "Modelling feedback processes underpinning management of ecosystem services: The role of participatory systems mapping," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 28(PA), pages 28-42.
    14. Justin D. Connolly & Graeme J. Doole, 2024. "An analysis of participants' introductory experience with causal loop diagrams (CLDs) using group model building (GMB) scripts," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 40(4), October.
    15. Milad Mousavian, H. & Hamed Shakouri, G. & Mashayekhi, Ali-Naghi & Kazemi, Aliyeh, 2020. "Does the short-term boost of renewable energies guarantee their stable long-term growth? Assessment of the dynamics of feed-in tariff policy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 1252-1268.
    16. Camilo Olaya, 2015. "Cows, agency, and the significance of operational thinking," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 31(4), pages 183-219, October.
    17. Navid Ghaffarzadegan & Ran Xu, 2018. "Late retirement, early careers, and the aging of U.S. science and engineering professors," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-16, December.
    18. Dhirasasna, NiNa & Sahin, Oz, 2021. "A system dynamics model for renewable energy technology adoption of the hotel sector," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1994-2007.
    19. Kirsten Davis & Navid Ghaffarzadegan & Jacob Grohs & Dustin Grote & Niyousha Hosseinichimeh & David Knight & Hesam Mahmoudi & Konstantinos Triantis, 2020. "The Lake Urmia vignette: a tool to assess understanding of complexity in socio‐environmental systems," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 36(2), pages 191-222, April.
    20. Arielle R. Deutsch & Leah Frerichs & Madeleine Perry & Mohammad S. Jalali, 2024. "Participatory modeling for high complexity, multi‐system issues: challenges and recommendations for balancing qualitative understanding and quantitative questions," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 40(4), October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:sysdyn:v:39:y:2023:i:3:p:277-294. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/0883-7066 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.