IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/scjsta/v42y2015i2p378-396.html

Forward Simulation Markov Chain Monte Carlo with Applications to Stochastic Epidemic Models

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Neal
  • Chien Lin Terry Huang

Abstract

type="main" xml:id="sjos12111-abs-0001"> For many stochastic models, it is difficult to make inference about the model parameters because it is impossible to write down a tractable likelihood given the observed data. A common solution is data augmentation in a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) framework. However, there are statistical problems where this approach has proved infeasible but where simulation from the model is straightforward leading to the popularity of the approximate Bayesian computation algorithm. We introduce a forward simulation MCMC (fsMCMC) algorithm, which is primarily based upon simulation from the model. The fsMCMC algorithm formulates the simulation of the process explicitly as a data augmentation problem. By exploiting non-centred parameterizations, an efficient MCMC updating schema for the parameters and augmented data is introduced, whilst maintaining straightforward simulation from the model. The fsMCMC algorithm is successfully applied to two distinct epidemic models including a birth–death–mutation model that has only previously been analysed using approximate Bayesian computation methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Neal & Chien Lin Terry Huang, 2015. "Forward Simulation Markov Chain Monte Carlo with Applications to Stochastic Epidemic Models," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 42(2), pages 378-396, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:scjsta:v:42:y:2015:i:2:p:378-396
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/sjos.12111
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Fearnhead & Dennis Prangle, 2012. "Constructing summary statistics for approximate Bayesian computation: semi-automatic approximate Bayesian computation," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 74(3), pages 419-474, June.
    2. McKinley, Trevelyan J. & Ross, Joshua V. & Deardon, Rob & Cook, Alex R., 2014. "Simulation-based Bayesian inference for epidemic models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 434-447.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Peter Neal & Fei Xiang, 2017. "Collapsing of Non-centred Parameterized MCMC Algorithms with Applications to Epidemic Models," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 44(1), pages 81-96, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xing Ju Lee & Christopher C. Drovandi & Anthony N. Pettitt, 2015. "Model choice problems using approximate Bayesian computation with applications to pathogen transmission data sets," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 71(1), pages 198-207, March.
    2. Grazzini, Jakob & Richiardi, Matteo G. & Tsionas, Mike, 2017. "Bayesian estimation of agent-based models," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 26-47.
    3. Gareth W. Peters & Efstathios Panayi & Francois Septier, 2015. "SMC-ABC methods for the estimation of stochastic simulation models of the limit order book," Papers 1504.05806, arXiv.org.
    4. D.T. Frazier & G.M. Martin & C.P. Robert & J. Rousseau, 2016. "Asymptotic Properties of Approximate Bayesian Computation," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 18/16, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
    5. repec:osf:osfxxx:enzgs_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. McKinley, Trevelyan J. & Ross, Joshua V. & Deardon, Rob & Cook, Alex R., 2014. "Simulation-based Bayesian inference for epidemic models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 434-447.
    7. Soubeyrand Samuel & Carpentier Florence & Guiton François & Klein Etienne K., 2013. "Approximate Bayesian computation with functional statistics," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 12(1), pages 17-37, March.
    8. Li, J. & Nott, D.J. & Fan, Y. & Sisson, S.A., 2017. "Extending approximate Bayesian computation methods to high dimensions via a Gaussian copula model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 77-89.
    9. Gael M. Martin & David T. Frazier & Christian P. Robert, 2020. "Computing Bayes: Bayesian Computation from 1763 to the 21st Century," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 14/20, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
    10. Mikael Sunnåker & Alberto Giovanni Busetto & Elina Numminen & Jukka Corander & Matthieu Foll & Christophe Dessimoz, 2013. "Approximate Bayesian Computation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, January.
    11. F. Baltazar-Larios & Luz Judith R. Esparza, 2025. "A novel method and comparison of methods for constructing Markov bridges," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 40(9), pages 4969-4990, December.
    12. Chiachío, Manuel & Saleh, Ali & Naybour, Susannah & Chiachío, Juan & Andrews, John, 2022. "Reduction of Petri net maintenance modeling complexity via Approximate Bayesian Computation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    13. Warne, David J. & Baker, Ruth E. & Simpson, Matthew J., 2018. "Multilevel rejection sampling for approximate Bayesian computation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 71-86.
    14. Creel, Michael & Kristensen, Dennis, 2016. "On selection of statistics for approximate Bayesian computing (or the method of simulated moments)," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 99-114.
    15. Pierre-Olivier Goffard & Patrick Laub, 2021. "Approximate Bayesian Computations to fit and compare insurance loss models," Working Papers hal-02891046, HAL.
    16. Bertl Johanna & Ewing Gregory & Kosiol Carolin & Futschik Andreas, 2017. "Approximate maximum likelihood estimation for population genetic inference," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 16(5-6), pages 291-312, December.
    17. Muhammad Faisal & Andreas Futschik & Ijaz Hussain & Mitwali Abd-el.Moemen, 2016. "Choosing summary statistics by least angle regression for approximate Bayesian computation," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(12), pages 2191-2202, September.
    18. Wilkinson Richard David, 2013. "Approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) gives exact results under the assumption of model error," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 12(2), pages 129-141, May.
    19. Lee, Xing Ju & Hainy, Markus & McKeone, James P. & Drovandi, Christopher C. & Pettitt, Anthony N., 2018. "ABC model selection for spatial extremes models applied to South Australian maximum temperature data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 128-144.
    20. Gyanendra Pokharel & Rob Deardon, 2022. "Emulation‐based inference for spatial infectious disease transmission models incorporating event time uncertainty," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 49(1), pages 455-479, March.
    21. Sebastian Calcetero-Vanegas & Andrei L. Badescu & X. Sheldon Lin, 2022. "Effective experience rating for large insurance portfolios via surrogate modeling," Papers 2211.06568, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2024.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:scjsta:v:42:y:2015:i:2:p:378-396. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0303-6898 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.