IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/rdevec/v30y2026i3p1847-1864.html

Labor Informality and Market Segmentation in Senegal

Author

Listed:
  • Carlos Rodríguez‐Castelán
  • Emmanuel Vazquez

Abstract

Understanding why workers select into informal employment is essential for designing effective formalization policies across Sub‐Saharan Africa, where nine out of 10 workers remain informal. This paper estimates a self‐selection model with entry barriers to quantify involuntary informality in Senegal, a representative country in terms of informality levels and labor market rigidity. Using nationally representative household survey data, we find that the preference for formal employment is higher among workers with formal education, those who are married, and those with fewer young children. Preference also rises with age but at a decreasing rate. Our results indicate that informality in Senegal is primarily voluntary: only 30% of informal workers are involuntarily excluded from formal jobs. Findings are robust to alternative model specifications, informality definitions, and sample restrictions. By providing new evidence on the drivers of voluntary versus involuntary informality, this paper contributes to the literature on labor market segmentation in West Africa, an understudied but highly informal region.

Suggested Citation

  • Carlos Rodríguez‐Castelán & Emmanuel Vazquez, 2026. "Labor Informality and Market Segmentation in Senegal," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(3), pages 1847-1864, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:rdevec:v:30:y:2026:i:3:p:1847-1864
    DOI: 10.1111/rode.70079
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.70079
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rode.70079?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:rdevec:v:30:y:2026:i:3:p:1847-1864. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1363-6669 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.