IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/polstu/v60y2012i2p434-454.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How is High Trust in China Possible? Comparing the Origins of Generalized Trust in Three Chinese Societies

Author

Listed:
  • H. Christoph Steinhardt

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • H. Christoph Steinhardt, 2012. "How is High Trust in China Possible? Comparing the Origins of Generalized Trust in Three Chinese Societies," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 60(2), pages 434-454, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:polstu:v:60:y:2012:i:2:p:434-454
    DOI: j.1467-9248.2011.00909.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00909.x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/j.1467-9248.2011.00909.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pascal Gantenbein & Axel Kind & Christophe Volonté, 2019. "Individualism and Venture Capital: A Cross-Country Study," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 59(5), pages 741-777, October.
    2. Xiaochen Gong & Shihua Ye, 2021. "Social Capital, the State’s Structural Intervention and Donors’ Choice Among Charitable Causes: Evidence from China," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 155(2), pages 647-674, June.
    3. Junfeng Jiang & Qingqun Li & Ru Kang & Peigang Wang, 2020. "Social Trust and Health: a Perspective of Urban-Rural Comparison in China," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 15(3), pages 737-756, July.
    4. Lingnan He & Kaisheng Lai & Zhongxuan Lin & Zhihao Ma, 2018. "Media Exposure and General Trust as Predictors of Post-traumatic Stress Disorder: Ten Years after the 5.12 Wenchuan Earthquake in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-20, October.
    5. H. Christoph Steinhardt & Jan Delhey, 2020. "Socio-Economic Modernization and the “Crisis of Trust” in China: A Multi-level Analysis of General and Particular Trust," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 152(3), pages 923-949, December.
    6. Liu, Jun & Zhao, Hui, 2021. "Privacy lost: Appropriating surveillance technology in China’s fight against COVID-19," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 64(6), pages 743-756.
    7. Haiyang Lu & Peishan Tong & Rong Zhu, 2020. "Longitudinal Evidence on Social Trust and Happiness in China: Causal Effects and Mechanisms," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 21(5), pages 1841-1858, June.
    8. Xian Huang, 2020. "The Chinese Dream: Hukou, Social Mobility, and Trust in Government," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 101(5), pages 2052-2070, September.
    9. Ruohuang Jiao & Wojtek Przepiorka & Vincent Buskens, 2022. "Moderators of reputation effects in peer-to-peer online markets: a meta-analytic model selection approach," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1041-1067, May.
    10. Kalischer Wellander, Benjamin & Sanandaji, Tino, 2018. "Tracing the Historic Roots of Generalized Trust," SSE Working Paper Series in Economic History 2018:1, Stockholm School of Economics, revised 10 May 2018.
    11. Pezeshkan, Amir & Smith, Adam & Fainshmidt, Stav & Amini Sedeh, Amirmahmood, 2016. "National business systems and firm innovation: A study of developing economies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 5413-5418.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:polstu:v:60:y:2012:i:2:p:434-454. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0032-3217 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.