IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/metroe/v56y2005i2p157-181.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Public Sector In A Model Of Growth And Distribution À La Pasinetti: Existence Of One‐ Or Two‐Class Economies

Author

Listed:
  • Massimiliano La Marca

Abstract

This paper explores the implications of different regimes of taxation and fiscal policies on the existence of a one‐ or two‐class economy in the Kaldor–Pasinetti approach of growth and income distribution. A simple model and its diagrammatical representation provide a complete taxonomy of the possible steady state equilibria and synthesize some early and recent contributions. It shows that the distribution among factors and the personal distribution among socio‐economic classes depend on the fiscal policy of the government, the behavioural parameters of actors and technology; but, provided that some conditions are fulfilled, the Cambridge Theorem and its distributional implications hold.

Suggested Citation

  • Massimiliano La Marca, 2005. "The Public Sector In A Model Of Growth And Distribution À La Pasinetti: Existence Of One‐ Or Two‐Class Economies," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(2), pages 157-181, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:metroe:v:56:y:2005:i:2:p:157-181
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-999X.2005.00211.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-999X.2005.00211.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-999X.2005.00211.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fazi, Elido & Salvadori, Neri, 1981. "The Existence of a Two-Class Economy in the Kaldor Model of Growth and Distribution," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 582-592.
    2. Elido Fazi & Neri Salvadori*, 1981. "The Existence Of A Two‐Class Economy In The Kaldor Model Of Growth And Distribution," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 582-592, November.
    3. Fazi, Elido & Salvadori, Neri, 1985. "The Existence of a Two-Class Economy in a General Cambridge Model of Growth and Distribution," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 9(2), pages 155-164, June.
    4. Steedman, Ian, 1972. "The State and the Outcome of the Pasinetti Process," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 82(328), pages 1387-1395, December.
    5. Taylor, Lance, 1995. "Pasinetti's Processes: Review Article," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 19(5), pages 697-713, October.
    6. Heinrich Bortis, 1993. "Notes on the Cambridge Equation," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 105-126, September.
    7. Luigi L. Pasinetti, 1962. "Rate of Profit and Income Distribution in Relation to the Rate of Economic Growth," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 29(4), pages 267-279.
    8. Denicolo, Vincenzo & Matteuzzi, Massimo, 1990. "Public Debt and the Pasinetti Paradox," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 14(3), pages 339-344, September.
    9. Dalziel, Paul C, 1991. "A Generalisation and Simplification of the Cambridge Theorem with Budget Deficits," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 15(3), pages 287-300, September.
    10. Palley, Thomas I, 1997. "Money, Fiscal Policy and the Cambridge Theorem," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 21(5), pages 633-639, September.
    11. Paul C. Dalziel, 1991. "A Note on Dalziel’s Model of Long-Run Distributive Equilibrium: Reply," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1), pages 121-124, September.
    12. Commendatore, Pasquale, 1999. "Pasinetti and Dual Equilibria in a Post Keynesian Model of Growth and Institutional Distribution," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 51(1), pages 223-236, January.
    13. Syed Ahmad, 1986. "A Pasinetti Theory of Relative Profit Share for the Anti-Pasinetti Case," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 149-158, September.
    14. Luigi L. Pasinetti, 1989. "Government Deficit Spending Is Not Incompatible with the Cambridge Theorem of the Rate of Profit: A Reply to Fleck and Domenghino," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(4), pages 641-647, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. João Gabriel de Araujo Oliveira & Joanilio Rodolpho Teixeira, 2020. "A note reconsidering a post‐Keynesian model of growth and distribution in the globalization context," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(3), pages 487-495, July.
    2. Linus Mattauch & Ottmar Edenhofer & David Klenert & Sophie Bénard, 2016. "Distributional Effects of Public Investment when Wealth and Classes are Back," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(3), pages 603-629, July.
    3. Luca Zamparelli, 2017. "Wealth Distribution, Elasticity of Substitution and Piketty: An ‘Anti-Dual’ Pasinetti Economy," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 68(4), pages 927-946, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luca Zamparelli, 2017. "Wealth Distribution, Elasticity of Substitution and Piketty: An ‘Anti-Dual’ Pasinetti Economy," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 68(4), pages 927-946, November.
    2. Baranzini, Mauro L. & Mirante, Amalia, 2021. "Pasinetti's theorem: A narrow escape, for what was to become an inexhaustible research programme," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 470-481.
    3. João Gabriel de Araujo Oliveira & Joanilio Rodolpho Teixeira, 2020. "A note reconsidering a post‐Keynesian model of growth and distribution in the globalization context," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(3), pages 487-495, July.
    4. Heinz D. Kurz & Neri Salvadori, 2010. "The Post-Keynesian Theories of Growth and Distribution: A Survey," Chapters, in: Mark Setterfield (ed.), Handbook of Alternative Theories of Economic Growth, chapter 4, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Thomas I. Palley, 2013. "Cambridge and neo-Kaleckian growth and distribution theory: comparison with an application to fiscal policy," Review of Keynesian Economics, Edward Elgar Publishing, vol. 1(1), pages 79-104, January.
    6. Javier López Bernardo & Engelbert Stockhammer & Félix López Martínez, 2016. "A post Keynesian theory for Tobin’s in a stock-flow consistent framework," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(2), pages 256-285, April.
    7. Soon Ryoo, 2016. "Inequality of Income and Wealth in the Long Run: A Kaldorian Perspective," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(2), pages 429-457, May.
    8. repec:saq:wpaper:1/15 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Stefan Ederer & Maximilian Mayerhofer & Miriam Rehm, 2021. "Rich and ever richer? Differential returns across socioeconomic groups," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(2), pages 283-301, April.
    10. Donald A. R. George, 2013. "A two-sector growth model with institutional saving and investment," Edinburgh School of Economics Discussion Paper Series 214, Edinburgh School of Economics, University of Edinburgh.
    11. Donald George, 2017. "A Pasinetti model of savings and growth," Edinburgh School of Economics Discussion Paper Series 278, Edinburgh School of Economics, University of Edinburgh.
    12. Joao Ricardo Faria & Ricardo Azevedo Araujo, 2004. "An Intertemporal Pasinettian Model with Government Sector," International Journal of Business and Economics, School of Management Development, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan, vol. 3(3), pages 257-268, December.
    13. Linus Mattauch & Ottmar Edenhofer & David Klenert & Sophie Bénard, 2016. "Distributional Effects of Public Investment when Wealth and Classes are Back," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(3), pages 603-629, July.
    14. George, Donald A R, 2012. "A two-sector growth model with institutional saving and investment," SIRE Discussion Papers 2012-28, Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE).
    15. Giuseppe Ciccarone, 2004. "Finance and the Cambridge equation," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 163-177.
    16. Javier López-Bernardo & Félix López-Martínez & Engelbert Stockhammer, 2016. "A Post-Keynesian Response to Piketty's ‘Fundamental Contradiction of Capitalism’," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 190-204, April.
    17. Khalid Saeed & Honggang Xu, 2013. "Infrastructure development as a policy lever for sustainable development," Chapters, in: M. A. Quaddus & M. A.B. Siddique (ed.), Handbook of Sustainable Development Planning, chapter 14, pages 322-356, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    18. Pasquale Commendatore & Carlo Panico & Antonio Pinto, 2010. "Government Spending, Effective Demand, Distribution and Growth: A Dynamic Analysis," Chapters, in: Neri Salvadori (ed.), Institutional and Social Dynamics of Growth and Distribution, chapter 6, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    19. Joanílio Rodolpho Teixeira, 2009. "Growth, Distribution, Stability and Government Budget Surplus: The Extended Cambridge Equation Revisited," Economia, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics], vol. 10(2), pages 239-251.
    20. Fritz Helmedag, 2008. "Income Effects Of Investments And Wages When Saving Rates Differ," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 76(6), pages 708-719, December.
    21. Gilberto Tadeu Lima, 2000. "Market concentration and technological innovation in a dynamic model of growth and distribution," BNL Quarterly Review, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro, vol. 53(215), pages 447-475.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:metroe:v:56:y:2005:i:2:p:157-181. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0026-1386 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.