Public Debt Controversies: An Essay in Reconciliation
The postwar literature on public debt is characterized by controversy among Keynesian, classical, and new classical positions. This paper seeks to reconcile these bodies of literature by showing that the analytical antagonisms stem from an excessive aggregation that is common to them all. In the process, the authors argue that public debt must be embedded in models of budgetary politics in which questions of intertemporal burden transfer become incidental to current wealth redistribution. Copyright 1992 by WWZ and Helbing & Lichtenhahn Verlag AG
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
Volume (Year): 45 (1992)
Issue (Month): 1 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0023-5962|
|Order Information:||Web: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/subs.asp?ref=0023-5962|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:kyklos:v:45:y:1992:i:1:p:37-49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing)or (Christopher F. Baum)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.