IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jpbect/v14y2012i1p1-34.html

Public Sector Rationing and Private Sector Selection

Author

Listed:
  • SIMONA GRASSI
  • CHING‐TO ALBERT MA

Abstract

We study the interaction between a public sector and a private sector in the provision of a private good. Under a limited budget, the public supplier uses a rationing policy. A private ?rm may supply the good to those consumers who are rationed by the public system. Consumers have di¤erent amounts of wealth, and costs of providing the good to them vary. We consider two information regimes: First, the public supplier observes only wealth information; second, the public supplier observes both wealth and cost information. The public supplier chooses a rationing policy based on its information; simultaneously, the private firm, observing only cost but not wealth information, chooses a pricing policy. In the first information regime, there is a continuum of equilibria; in each, rich consumers are rationed, and the private firm sells to these rationed consumers at high prices. In the second regime, there is a unique equilibrium. The public supplier allocates the good to consumers according to a cost-e¤ectiveness rule. In the equilibrium, rationed consumers have high costs relative to the bene?t, and the rationing rule is the same as if the private market were inactive.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Simona Grassi & Ching‐To Albert Ma, 2012. "Public Sector Rationing and Private Sector Selection," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 14(1), pages 1-34, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jpbect:v:14:y:2012:i:1:p:1-34
    DOI: j.1467-9779.2011.01532.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1467-9779.2011.01532.x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/j.1467-9779.2011.01532.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or

    for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rosella Levaggi & Marcello Montefiori, 2013. "Patient selection in a mixed oligopoly market for health care: the role of the soft budget constraint," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 60(1), pages 49-70, March.
    2. Ifzal Ahmad, 2017. "Understanding Internal, External and Relational Attributions in Reaction to Corporate Social Responsibility," Business & Economic Review, Institute of Management Sciences, Peshawar, Pakistan, vol. 9(4), pages 49-64, December.
    3. Simona Grassi & Ching-to Albert Ma, 2008. "Rationing Poor Consumers to Reduce Prices," Boston University - Department of Economics - Working Papers Series wp2008-015, Boston University - Department of Economics.
    4. Vesa Kanniainen & Juha Laine & Ismo Linnosmaa, 2019. "Pricing the Pharmaceuticals when the Ability to Pay Differs: Taking Vertical Equity Seriously," CESifo Working Paper Series 8031, CESifo.
    5. Laine, Liisa T. & Ma, Ching-to Albert, 2017. "Quality and competition between public and private firms," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 336-353.
    6. Chiara Canta, 2021. "Efficiency, access, and the mixed delivery of health care services," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 23(3), pages 510-533, June.
    7. Simona Grassi & Ching-to Ma, 2010. "Subsidy design: wealth versus benefits," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 101(1), pages 49-72, September.
    8. Putnam, Joshua T., 2015. "A simple approach to projecting the electoral college," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 910-915.
    9. Grassi, Simona & Ma, Ching-to Albert, 2011. "Optimal public rationing and price response," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 1197-1206.
    10. Liu, Ting & Albert Ma, Ching-to & Mak, Henry Y., 2018. "Incentives for motivated experts in a partnership," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 296-313.
    11. Andrew, Jane & Cahill, Damien, 2017. "Rationalising and resisting neoliberalism: The uneven geography of costs," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 12-28.
    12. Glazer, Jacob & McGuire, Thomas G., 2013. "Making Medicare advantage a middle-class program," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 463-473.
    13. Yang, Ou & Chan, Marc K. & Cheng, Terence C. & Yong, Jongsay, 2020. "Cream skimming: Theory and evidence from hospital transfers and capacity utilization," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 68-87.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jpbect:v:14:y:2012:i:1:p:1-34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/apettea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.