IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Non-parametric tests for distributional treatment effect for randomly censored responses

Listed author(s):
  • Myoung-jae Lee

For a binary treatment "ν"=0, 1 and the corresponding 'potential response'"Y"-super-0 for the control group ("ν"=0) and "Y"-super-1 for the treatment group ("ν"=1), one definition of no treatment effect is that "Y"-super-0 and "Y"-super-1 follow the same distribution given a covariate vector "X". Koul and Schick have provided a non-parametric test for no distributional effect when the realized response (1 - "ν")"Y"-super-0+"ν""Y"-super-1 is fully observed and the distribution of "X" is the same across the two groups. This test is thus not applicable to censored responses, nor to non-experimental (i.e. observational) studies that entail different distributions of "X" across the two groups. We propose '"X"-matched' non-parametric tests generalizing the test of Koul and Schick following an idea of Gehan. Our tests are applicable to non-experimental data with randomly censored responses. In addition to these motivations, the tests have several advantages. First, they have the intuitive appeal of comparing all available pairs across the treatment and control groups, instead of selecting a number of matched controls (or treated) in the usual pair or multiple matching. Second, whereas most matching estimators or tests have a non-overlapping support (of "X") problem across the two groups, our tests have a built-in protection against the problem. Third, Gehan's idea allows the tests to make good use of censored observations. A simulation study is conducted, and an empirical illustration for a job training effect on the duration of unemployment is provided. Copyright (c) 2009 Royal Statistical Society.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
File Function: link to full text
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by Royal Statistical Society in its journal Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology).

Volume (Year): 71 (2009)
Issue (Month): 1 ()
Pages: 243-264

in new window

Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssb:v:71:y:2009:i:1:p:243-264
Contact details of provider: Postal:
12 Errol Street, London EC1Y 8LX, United Kingdom

Phone: -44-171-638-8998
Fax: -44-171-256-7598
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

Order Information: Web:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssb:v:71:y:2009:i:1:p:243-264. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing)

or (Christopher F. Baum)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.