IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jomstd/v16y1979i1p70-79.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relationships Between Structure And Technology At The Organizational And Job Levels

Author

Listed:
  • Donald Gerwin

Abstract

There are two main approaches to the study of organizational structure and technology. One is at the organizational level and the other is at the job level. The conclusion that structure and technology are not significantly related is based primarily on the results of organizational level research. Alternatively, a persuasive case can be made that these results stem from lack of a common paradigm. Investigation of research at the job level provides one way of testing this assertion because it is based on a more or less unified framework. When results at the job level are compared a much better case is made for structural and technological covariation. A reasonable doubt must remain concerning the demise of the technological imperative.

Suggested Citation

  • Donald Gerwin, 1979. "Relationships Between Structure And Technology At The Organizational And Job Levels," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(1), pages 70-79, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:16:y:1979:i:1:p:70-79
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1979.tb00375.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1979.tb00375.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1979.tb00375.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. West, Jonathan, 2000. "Institutions, information processing, and organization structure in research and development: evidence from the semiconductor industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 349-373, March.
    2. Oded Shenkar & Shmuel Ellis, 2022. "The Rise and Fall of Structural Contingency Theory: A Theory’s ‘autopsy’," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(3), pages 782-818, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:16:y:1979:i:1:p:70-79. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-2380 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.