IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jinfst/v75y2024i5p567-580.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is googling risky? A study on risk perception and experiences of adverse consequences in web search

Author

Listed:
  • Helena Häußler
  • Sebastian Schultheiß
  • Dirk Lewandowski

Abstract

Search engines, such as Google, have a considerable impact on society. Therefore, undesirable consequences, such as retrieving incorrect search results, pose a risk to users. Although previous research has reported the adverse outcomes of web search, little is known about how search engine users evaluate those outcomes. In this study, we show which aspects of web search are perceived as risky using a sample (N = 3884) representative of the German Internet population. We found that many participants are often concerned with adverse consequences immediately appearing on the search engine result page. For example, 45.2% of respondents are concerned about retrieving incorrect information. In contrast, consequences with a delayed impact are rarely perceived as a risk. Moreover, participants' experiences with adverse consequences are directly related to their risk perception. Our results demonstrate that people perceive risks related to web search. In addition to our study, there is a need for more independent research on the possible detrimental outcomes of web search to monitor and mitigate risks. Apart from risks for individuals, search engines with a massive number of users have an extraordinary impact on society; therefore, the acceptable risks of web search should be discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Helena Häußler & Sebastian Schultheiß & Dirk Lewandowski, 2024. "Is googling risky? A study on risk perception and experiences of adverse consequences in web search," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 75(5), pages 567-580, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:75:y:2024:i:5:p:567-580
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.24802
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24802
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.24802?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Catherine E. Althaus, 2005. "A Disciplinary Perspective on the Epistemological Status of Risk," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(3), pages 567-588, June.
    2. Judit Bar‐Ilan & Kevin Keenoy & Eti Yaari & Mark Levene, 2007. "User rankings of search engine results," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 58(9), pages 1254-1266, July.
    3. Ortwin Renn, 1998. "Three decades of risk research: accomplishments and new challenges," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(1), pages 49-71, January.
    4. Bruno Chauvin & Danièle Hermand & Etienne Mullet, 2007. "Risk Perception and Personality Facets," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1), pages 171-185, February.
    5. Dirk Lewandowski & Friederike Kerkmann & Sandra Rümmele & Sebastian Sünkler, 2018. "An empirical investigation on search engine ad disclosure," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 69(3), pages 420-437, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dirk Lewandowski & Jutta Haider & Olof Sundin, 2024. "JASIST Special Issue Editorial: Re‐orienting search engine research in information science," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 75(5), pages 503-511, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wim Kellens & Ruud Zaalberg & Tijs Neutens & Wouter Vanneuville & Philippe De Maeyer, 2011. "An Analysis of the Public Perception of Flood Risk on the Belgian Coast," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(7), pages 1055-1068, July.
    2. Gundula Glowka & Andreas Kallmünzer & Anita Zehrer, 2021. "Enterprise risk management in small and medium family enterprises: the role of family involvement and CEO tenure," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 1213-1231, September.
    3. Selena Aureli & Federica Salvatori, 2013. "Investigation of risk management and risk disclosure practices of Italian listed local utilities," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(1), pages 121-167.
    4. Yanbo Zhang & Yibao Wang & Ahmad Bayiz Ahmad & Ashfaq Ahmad Shah & Wen Qing, 2021. "How Do Individual-Level Characteristics Influence Cross-Domain Risk Perceptions Among Chinese Urban Residents?," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, April.
    5. Hannah A D Keage & Tobias Loetscher, 2018. "Estimating everyday risk: Subjective judgments are related to objective risk, mapping of numerical magnitudes and previous experience," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-17, December.
    6. Sarah J. Cowell & Robyn Fairman & Ragnar E. Lofstedt, 2002. "Use of Risk Assessment and Life Cycle Assessment in Decision Making: A Common Policy Research Agenda," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(5), pages 879-894, October.
    7. Aven, Terje, 2011. "Selective critique of risk assessments with recommendations for improving methodology and practise," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(5), pages 509-514.
    8. P. Marijn Poortvliet & Anne Marike Lokhorst, 2016. "The Key Role of Experiential Uncertainty when Dealing with Risks: Its Relationships with Demand for Regulation and Institutional Trust," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(8), pages 1615-1629, August.
    9. Andy Stirling & Sue Mayer, 2001. "A Novel Approach to the Appraisal of Technological Risk: A Multicriteria Mapping Study of a Genetically Modified Crop," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 19(4), pages 529-555, August.
    10. Terje Aven, 2012. "Foundational Issues in Risk Assessment and Risk Management," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(10), pages 1647-1656, October.
    11. Hsieh, Hui-Ching & Nguyen, Dat Thanh & Nguyen, Thien Le-Hoang, 2024. "Betting on success: Unveiling the role of local gambling culture in equity crowdfunding," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    12. Poier, Stefan, 2023. "A matter of risk? Investigating the battery purchase decision in the German photovoltaics market," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    13. Agathe Backer‐Grøndahl & Aslak Fyhri & Pål Ulleberg & Astrid Helene Amundsen, 2009. "Accidents and Unpleasant Incidents: Worry in Transport and Prediction of Travel Behavior," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(9), pages 1217-1226, September.
    14. Timotijevic, Lada & Barnett, Julie & Brown, Kerry & Raats, Monique M. & Shepherd, Richard, 2013. "Scientific decision-making and stakeholder consultations: The case of salt recommendations," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 79-86.
    15. Kati Orru & Pekka Tiittanen & Sari Ung-Lanki & Hans Orru & Timo Lanki, 2022. "Perception of Risks from Wood Combustion and Traffic Induced Air Pollution: Evidence from Northern Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-17, August.
    16. Udo Milkau, 2017. "Risk Culture during the Last 2000 Years—From an Aleatory Society to the Illusion of Risk Control," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-20, December.
    17. Lucian Ispas & Costel Mironeasa & Alessandro Silvestri, 2023. "Risk-Based Approach in the Implementation of Integrated Management Systems: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-22, June.
    18. Gabriella Y. Meltzer & Virginia W. Chang & Sarah A. Lieff & Margaux M. Grivel & Lawrence H. Yang & Don C. Des Jarlais, 2021. "Behavioral Correlates of COVID-19 Worry: Stigma, Knowledge, and News Source," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-15, October.
    19. Maayan Zhitomirsky-Geffet & Judit Bar-Ilan & Mark Levene, 2016. "A Markov Chain Model for Changes in Users’ Assessment of Search Results," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(5), pages 1-14, May.
    20. Dipak Raj Pant & Stéphane Jedrzejczak, 2022. "Pandemics, Business Resilience and Sustainability," LIUC Papers in Economics 2022-12, Cattaneo University (LIUC).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:75:y:2024:i:5:p:567-580. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.