IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jinfst/v70y2019i11p1183-1193.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Opinion convergence versus polarization: examining opinion distributions in online word‐of‐mouth

Author

Listed:
  • Jianxiong Huang
  • Wai Fong Boh
  • Kim Huat Goh

Abstract

We examine how opinion distributions (i.e., opinion polarization and convergence over time) differ across product salient platforms (product platforms) versus product non‐salient platforms (non‐product platforms). Drawing on the theory of impression management, we hypothesize and explain when and why consumers choose to post their comments on different platforms, and how their behavior will be affected when they choose to post on online platforms. To test the hypotheses, we collected and text‐mined online posts from product platforms such as review aggregator sites, discussion forums, and consumer rating websites, and non‐product platforms such as microblogs. The results showed that product platforms have more polarized opinions, and exhibit more convergence in opinion across time, compared with non‐product platforms. Our findings advise researchers and practitioners to pay attention to the characteristics of online platforms, and how users' perceptions of the purpose of the online platform may affect their online posting behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Jianxiong Huang & Wai Fong Boh & Kim Huat Goh, 2019. "Opinion convergence versus polarization: examining opinion distributions in online word‐of‐mouth," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 70(11), pages 1183-1193, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:70:y:2019:i:11:p:1183-1193
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.24193
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24193
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.24193?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Percia David, Dimitri & Maréchal, Loïc & Lacube, William & Gillard, Sébastien & Tsesmelis, Michael & Maillart, Thomas & Mermoud, Alain, 2023. "Measuring security development in information technologies: A scientometric framework using arXiv e-prints," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:70:y:2019:i:11:p:1183-1193. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.