IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jemstr/v14y2005i3p755-773.html

Spillover Effects of Restrictive Drug Formularies on Physician Prescribing Behavior: Evidence from Medicaid

Author

Listed:
  • Y. Richard Wang
  • Mark V. Pauly

Abstract

Restrictive drug formularies may influence physician prescribing behavior for other patients with more generous drug benefit, so‐called “spillover effects.” We focus on Protonix, a proton pump inhibitor, introduced at a discount price, and study subsequent physician prescribing decision for open‐formulary Medicaid patients. Using two national databases on physician prescribing patterns and health plan drug formularies, we find consistent evidence of significant, positive spillover effects from 1‐PPI and 2‐PPI formularies that include Protonix onto Medicaid, with a larger effect from the most restrictive, 1‐PPI formularies. Physicians who prescribe a higher proportion of Protonix to their non‐Medicaid patients because of restrictive formularies, also prescribe a higher proportion of Protonix to their Medicaid patients with an open formulary. Each 10% increase in Protonix's predicted non‐Medicaid share results in an 8% increase in its share of Medicaid prescriptions (p

Suggested Citation

  • Y. Richard Wang & Mark V. Pauly, 2005. "Spillover Effects of Restrictive Drug Formularies on Physician Prescribing Behavior: Evidence from Medicaid," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(3), pages 755-773, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jemstr:v:14:y:2005:i:3:p:755-773
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-9134.2005.00081.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9134.2005.00081.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1530-9134.2005.00081.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Glied, Sherry & Zivin, Joshua Graff, 2002. "How do doctors behave when some (but not all) of their patients are in managed care?," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 337-353, March.
    2. Baker, Laurence C., 1997. "The effect of HMOs on fee-for-service health care expenditures: Evidence from Medicare," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 453-481, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Suppliet, Moritz & Herr, Annika, 2016. "Cost-Sharing and Drug Pricing Strategies : Introducing Tiered Co-Payments in Reference Price Markets," Other publications TiSEM 4d692f0e-8577-4392-b413-2, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    2. Jonathan Ketcham & Andrew Epstein, 2006. "Which Physicians are Affected Most by Medicaid Preferred Drug Lists for Statins and Antihypertensives?," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 27-40, December.
    3. Katharina E. Blankart & Friederike Arndt, 2020. "Physician-Level Cost Control Measures and Regional Variation of Biosimilar Utilization in Germany," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-14, June.
    4. Shanjun Li & Ramanan Laxminarayan, 2015. "Are Physicians' Prescribing Decisions Sensitive to Drug Prices? Evidence from a Free‐antibiotics Program," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(2), pages 158-174, February.
    5. Andrew J. Epstein & Jonathan D. Ketcham, 2014. "Information technology and agency in physicians' prescribing decisions," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 45(2), pages 422-448, June.
    6. Leila Agha & Soomi Kim & Danielle Li, 2022. "Insurance Design and Pharmaceutical Innovation," American Economic Review: Insights, American Economic Association, vol. 4(2), pages 191-208, June.
    7. Matthew C. Harris & Lawrence M. Kessler & Matthew N. Murray & Beth Glenn, 2020. "Prescription Opioids and Labor Market Pains: The Effect of Schedule II Opioids on Labor Force Participation and Unemployment," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 55(4), pages 1319-1364.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Katherine Baicker & Dana Goldman, 2011. "Patient Cost-Sharing and Healthcare Spending Growth," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 25(2), pages 47-68, Spring.
    2. Michael Geruso & Timothy Layton, 2020. "Upcoding: Evidence from Medicare on Squishy Risk Adjustment," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 128(3), pages 984-1026.
    3. Baicker, Katherine & Chernew, Michael E. & Robbins, Jacob A., 2013. "The spillover effects of Medicare managed care: Medicare Advantage and hospital utilization," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 1289-1300.
    4. Elizabeth L. Munnich & Michael R. Richards, 2020. "Treatment flows after outsourcing public insurance provision: Evidence from Florida Medicaid," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(11), pages 1343-1363, November.
    5. Pierre Azoulay & Ariel Fishman, 2020. "The Rise of For-Profit Experimental Medicine," NBER Working Papers 26892, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Finkelstein, Amy & McKnight, Robin, 2008. "What did Medicare do? The initial impact of Medicare on mortality and out of pocket medical spending," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(7), pages 1644-1668, July.
    7. Ana Aizcorbe & Tina Highfill, 2015. "Medical Care Expenditure Indexes for the US, 1980-2006," BEA Working Papers 0121, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
    8. Katherine Baicker & Jacob A. Robbins, 2015. "Medicare Payments and System-Level Health-Care Use: The Spillover Effects of Medicare Managed Care," American Journal of Health Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 1(4), pages 399-431, Fall.
    9. Kevin Callison, 2016. "Medicare Managed Care Spillovers and Treatment Intensity," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(7), pages 873-887, July.
    10. Daron Acemoglu & Amy Finkelstein, 2008. "Input and Technology Choices in Regulated Industries: Evidence from the Health Care Sector," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 116(5), pages 837-880, October.
    11. Suchin Virabhak & Wook Sohn, 2009. "The impact of Medicaid's preferred drug lists on physicians' prescribing behaviour," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(21), pages 2705-2725.
    12. Getzen, Thomas E., 2000. "Health care is an individual necessity and a national luxury: applying multilevel decision models to the analysis of health care expenditures," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 259-270, March.
    13. Richard G. Frank, 2004. "Behavioral Economics and Health Economics," NBER Working Papers 10881, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Johanna Catherine Maclean & Chandler McClellan & Michael F. Pesko & Daniel Polsky, 2023. "Medicaid reimbursement rates for primary care services and behavioral health outcomes," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), pages 873-909, April.
    15. Yazhen Gong & Hao Li & Moon Parks & Jun Pang & Charlotte Fraiture, 2018. "The role of social capital for farmers’ climate change adaptation in Lancang River basin in China," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 149(1), pages 75-89, July.
    16. Duggan, Mark, 2004. "Does contracting out increase the efficiency of government programs? Evidence from Medicaid HMOs," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(12), pages 2549-2572, December.
    17. Andrew J. Epstein & Jonathan D. Ketcham, 2014. "Information technology and agency in physicians' prescribing decisions," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 45(2), pages 422-448, June.
    18. Kathleen J. Mullen & Richard G. Frank & Meredith B. Rosenthal, 2010. "Can you get what you pay for? Pay‐for‐performance and the quality of healthcare providers," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 41(1), pages 64-91, March.
    19. Laurence Baker & Joanne Spetz, 1999. "Managed Care and Medical Technology Growth," NBER Chapters, in: Frontiers in Health Policy Research, volume 2, pages 27-52, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Yu‐Chu Shen, 2009. "Do HMO and its for‐profit expansion jeopardize the survival of hospital safety net services?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(3), pages 305-320, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jemstr:v:14:y:2005:i:3:p:755-773. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.kellogg.northwestern.edu/research/journals/JEMS/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.