IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v63y2025i6p1886-1909.html

When Expertise Is Not Enough: Explaining the European Commission's Non‐success in the Integration of Public Sector Accounting

Author

Listed:
  • Pascal Horni

Abstract

The European Commission crucially relies on expertise and advice to fulfil its focal role in drafting policies. For this reason, it maintains numerous expert groups. When handling technical complex cases, expert groups engage in deliberative supranationalist problem‐solving that is driven by logic and knowledge. Based on the Commission's policy initiative to develop European Public Sector Accounting Standards (EPSAS) for the integration of European Union member states' government accounting practices, this study investigates how and under what conditions policy incentives translate via expert group deliberations into draft policies. Drawing on policy design literature and using process tracing, this study finds that pre‐existing policy instruments or design choices on higher order policy elements could lead to challenges in achieving the integrity and superiority of solutions at the level of calibration and street‐level requirements, thus failing to produce the necessary expert consensus.

Suggested Citation

  • Pascal Horni, 2025. "When Expertise Is Not Enough: Explaining the European Commission's Non‐success in the Integration of Public Sector Accounting," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(6), pages 1886-1909, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:63:y:2025:i:6:p:1886-1909
    DOI: 10.1111/jcms.13705
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13705
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jcms.13705?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:63:y:2025:i:6:p:1886-1909. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.