IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamist/v61y2010i5p869-890.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

National study of information seeking behavior of academic researchers in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Xi Niu
  • Bradley M. Hemminger
  • Cory Lown
  • Stephanie Adams
  • Cecelia Brown
  • Allison Level
  • Merinda McLure
  • Audrey Powers
  • Michele R. Tennant
  • Tara Cataldo

Abstract

As new technologies and information delivery systems emerge, the way in which individuals search for information to support research, teaching, and creative activities is changing. To understand different aspects of researchers' information‐seeking behavior, this article surveyed 2,063 academic researchers in natural science, engineering, and medical science from five research universities in the United States. A Web‐based, in‐depth questionnaire was designed to quantify researchers' information searching, information use, and information storage behaviors. Descriptive statistics are reported. Additionally, analysis of results is broken out by institutions to compare differences among universities. Significant findings are reported, with the biggest changes because of increased utilization of electronic methods for searching, sharing, and storing scholarly content, as well as for utilizing library services. Generally speaking, researchers in the five universities had similar information‐seeking behavior, with small differences because of varying academic unit structures and myriad library services provided at the individual institutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Xi Niu & Bradley M. Hemminger & Cory Lown & Stephanie Adams & Cecelia Brown & Allison Level & Merinda McLure & Audrey Powers & Michele R. Tennant & Tara Cataldo, 2010. "National study of information seeking behavior of academic researchers in the United States," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 61(5), pages 869-890, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:61:y:2010:i:5:p:869-890
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.21307
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21307
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.21307?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wayne Buente & Alice Robbin, 2008. "Trends in Internet information behavior, 2000–2004," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 59(11), pages 1743-1760, September.
    2. Delia Neuman, 1995. "High school students' use of databases: Results of a national Delphi study," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 46(4), pages 284-298, May.
    3. Cecelia Brown, 2007. "The role of Web‐based information in the scholarly communication of chemists: Citation and content analyses of American Chemical Society Journals," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 58(13), pages 2055-2065, November.
    4. Cecelia M. Brown, 1999. "Information seeking behavior of scientists in the electronic information age: Astronomers, chemists, mathematicians, and physicists," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 50(10), pages 929-943.
    5. Philip M. Davis, 2004. "Information‐seeking behavior of chemists: A transaction log analysis of referral URLs," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 55(4), pages 326-332, February.
    6. Bradley M. Hemminger & Dihui Lu & K.T.L. Vaughan & Stephanie J. Adams, 2007. "Information seeking behavior of academic scientists," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 58(14), pages 2205-2225, December.
    7. Paul N. Gorman, 1995. "Information needs of physicians," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 46(10), pages 729-736, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gabriela Meșniță & Dumitru Oprea & Florin Dumitriu, 2011. "Research Projects And Web 2.0: Challenges And Effects," Analele Stiintifice ale Universitatii "Alexandru Ioan Cuza" din Iasi - Stiinte Economice (1954-2015), Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 2011, pages 265-277, july.
    2. Elizabeth Martín-Mora & Shari Ellis & Lawrence M Page, 2020. "Use of web-based species occurrence information systems by academics and government professionals," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-41, July.
    3. Kwabena Asiedu Bugyei & Raphael Kwame Kavi & Grace Obeng-Koranteng, 2019. "Assessing the Awareness and Usage of Reference Management Software (RMS) Among Researchers of the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) Ghana," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(03), pages 1-24, September.
    4. S. Ravikumar & Bidyut Bikash Boruah & M. N. Ravikumar, 2022. "Correlation study between citation count and Mendeley readership of the articles of Sri Lankan authors," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(8), pages 4873-4885, August.
    5. Ehsan Mohammadi & Mike Thelwall & Kayvan Kousha, 2016. "Can Mendeley bookmarks reflect readership? A survey of user motivations," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 67(5), pages 1198-1209, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Axelle Asmar & Leo van Audenhove & Ilse Mariën, 2020. "Social Support for Digital Inclusion: Towards a Typology of Social Support Patterns," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 138-150.
    2. Lanu Kim & Jason H. Portenoy & Jevin D. West & Katherine W. Stovel, 2020. "Scientific journals still matter in the era of academic search engines and preprint archives," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 71(10), pages 1218-1226, October.
    3. Wang, Xianwen & Wang, Zhi & Mao, Wenli & Liu, Chen, 2014. "How far does scientific community look back?," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 8(3), pages 562-568.
    4. Katrin Hussinger & Lorenzo Palladini, 2024. "Information accessibility and knowledge creation: the impact of Google’s withdrawal from China on scientific research," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(6), pages 753-783, July.
    5. repec:plo:pone00:0059877 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Laor, Tal & Lissitsa, Sabina & Galily, Yair, 2019. "Online digital Radion apps usages in Israel: Consumers, consumption and meaning," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    7. Ramkumar Janakiraman & Shantanu Dutta & Catarina Sismeiro & Philip Stern, 2008. "Physicians' Persistence and Its Implications for Their Response to Promotion of Prescription Drugs," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(6), pages 1080-1093, June.
    8. Elizabeth Martín-Mora & Shari Ellis & Lawrence M Page, 2020. "Use of web-based species occurrence information systems by academics and government professionals," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-41, July.
    9. Ehsan Mohammadi & Mike Thelwall & Stefanie Haustein & Vincent Larivière, 2015. "Who reads research articles? An altmetrics analysis of Mendeley user categories," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 66(9), pages 1832-1846, September.
    10. Ahsan Ullah & Kanwal Ameen, 2021. "Relating research growth, authorship patterns and publishing outlets: a bibliometric study of LIS articles produced by Pakistani authors," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(9), pages 8029-8047, September.
    11. Axelle Asmar & Leo van Audenhove & Ilse Mariën, 2020. "Social Support for Digital Inclusion: Towards a Typology of Social Support Patterns," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 138-150.
    12. Aurora González-Teruel & Gregorio González-Alcaide & Maite Barrios & María-Francisca Abad-García, 2015. "Mapping recent information behavior research: an analysis of co-authorship and co-citation networks," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 103(2), pages 687-705, May.
    13. Amalia Mas-Bleda & Mike Thelwall & Kayvan Kousha & Isidro F. Aguillo, 2014. "Do highly cited researchers successfully use the social web?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 101(1), pages 337-356, October.
    14. Robert Tomaszewski, 2017. "Citations to chemical resources in scholarly articles: CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics and The Merck Index," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 112(3), pages 1865-1879, September.
    15. Yu Zhang & Hanyang Cao & Wang Zhang & Yating Wang, 2023. "How Digital Skills Influence on Digital Participation in China? The Mediating Roles of Online Interpersonal Communication and Online Immersion," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    16. Zahed Bigdeli & Morteza Kokabi & Gholam Reza Rajabi & Ali Gazni, 2013. "Patterns of authors’ information scattering: towards a causal explanation of information scattering from a scholarly information-seeking behavior perspective," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 96(1), pages 103-131, July.
    17. Shengli Deng & Sudi Xia, 2020. "Mapping the interdisciplinarity in information behavior research: a quantitative study using diversity measure and co-occurrence analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(1), pages 489-513, July.
    18. Yi Bu & Tian-yi Liu & Win-bin Huang, 2016. "MACA: a modified author co-citation analysis method combined with general descriptive metadata of citations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 108(1), pages 143-166, July.
    19. Juan Pablo Bascur & Suzan Verberne & Nees Jan Eck & Ludo Waltman, 2023. "Academic information retrieval using citation clusters: in-depth evaluation based on systematic reviews," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(5), pages 2895-2921, May.
    20. Georgiou, Andrew & Makri, Stephann, 2015. "How local government policy workers use information: An interview study and design recommendations," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 472-489.
    21. Bhaskar Mukherjee, 2009. "Scholarly research in LIS open access electronic journals: A bibliometric study," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 80(1), pages 167-194, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:61:y:2010:i:5:p:869-890. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.