IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aic/journl/y2011vsep265-277.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research Projects And Web 2.0: Challenges And Effects

Author

Listed:
  • Gabriela Meșniță

    (Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, "Al. I. Cuza" University, Iasi, Romania)

  • Dumitru Oprea

    (Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, "Al. I. Cuza" University, Iasi, Romania)

  • Florin Dumitriu

    (Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, "Al. I. Cuza" University, Iasi, Romania)

Abstract

There are already a few years since we heard about Web 2.0. There was a real frenzy around this new concept. In short time new terms have emerged related to Web 2.0 like Government 2.0, Research 2.0, e-Science 2.0 and Project Management 2.0. This paper aims to focus on the challenges of project management under Web 2.0, especially research projects. What is the awareness of project teams in using Web 2.0 tools? What is the confidence on information gathered with Web 2.0 tools? How will the team results and productivity be affected? These are few questions that undertake to find some hypothesis for next article with focus on Romanian research projects. The analysis needs and the paper conclusions will be based on interpretation of existing statistics and data gathering on the web.

Suggested Citation

  • Gabriela Meșniță & Dumitru Oprea & Florin Dumitriu, 2011. "Research Projects And Web 2.0: Challenges And Effects," Analele Stiintifice ale Universitatii "Alexandru Ioan Cuza" din Iasi - Stiinte Economice (1954-2015), Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 2011, pages 265-277, july.
    • Handle: RePEc:aic:journl:y:2011:v:se:p:265-277
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://anale.feaa.uaic.ro/anale/resurse/2011SEinfo4mesnita.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://anale.feaa.uaic.ro/anale/ro/Arhiva%202011SE-Mesnita_Oprea_Dumitriu/440
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xi Niu & Bradley M. Hemminger & Cory Lown & Stephanie Adams & Cecelia Brown & Allison Level & Merinda McLure & Audrey Powers & Michele R. Tennant & Tara Cataldo, 2010. "National study of information seeking behavior of academic researchers in the United States," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 61(5), pages 869-890, May.
    2. Xi Niu & Bradley M. Hemminger & Cory Lown & Stephanie Adams & Cecelia Brown & Allison Level & Merinda McLure & Audrey Powers & Michele R. Tennant & Tara Cataldo, 2010. "National study of information seeking behavior of academic researchers in the United States," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 61(5), pages 869-890, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. S. Ravikumar & Bidyut Bikash Boruah & M. N. Ravikumar, 2022. "Correlation study between citation count and Mendeley readership of the articles of Sri Lankan authors," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(8), pages 4873-4885, August.
    2. Elizabeth Martín-Mora & Shari Ellis & Lawrence M Page, 2020. "Use of web-based species occurrence information systems by academics and government professionals," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-41, July.
    3. Ehsan Mohammadi & Mike Thelwall & Kayvan Kousha, 2016. "Can Mendeley bookmarks reflect readership? A survey of user motivations," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 67(5), pages 1198-1209, May.
    4. Kwabena Asiedu Bugyei & Raphael Kwame Kavi & Grace Obeng-Koranteng, 2019. "Assessing the Awareness and Usage of Reference Management Software (RMS) Among Researchers of the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) Ghana," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(03), pages 1-24, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Web 2.0; project management; research project;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M15 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - IT Management
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aic:journl:y:2011:v:se:p:265-277. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sireteanu Napoleon-Alexandru (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feaicro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.