IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/inecol/v28y2024i5p1060-1072.html

Deriving material composition of products using life cycle inventory databases

Author

Listed:
  • Levon Amatuni
  • Bernhard Steubing
  • Reinout Heijungs
  • Tales Yamamoto
  • José M. Mogollón

Abstract

Understanding the detailed material composition of the various industrial and consumer products is essential for implementing efficient recycling practices and policies, conducting material flow analyses, and facilitating a transition toward a circular economy. However, existing data sources are limited in their product and material coverage. Currently, no source or methodology allows such data to be obtained in a relatively uniform, updated, and accessible manner across a diverse range of products. This work presents an approach that allows estimating the material composition of thousands of products using available life cycle inventory (LCI) databases. Methodologically, this is implemented by splitting the physical flows that describe supply chains in LCI databases into “incorporated” and “not incorporated” fractions using an incorporation parameter. Building primarily on existing matrix‐based life cycle assessment calculations, this approach can be used to calculate the material content of products. A generally applicable mathematical model, as well as a ready‐to‐use software, is presented for future practitioners. To demonstrate the robustness of the proposed method, a case study involving three metals and plastic in three consumer goods has been conducted based on the ecoinvent database. Our method delivered accurate material content estimates (i.e., weight fractions of materials in products) with an average relative error of 26% and an absolute error of 1.1% (between our estimates and existing values).

Suggested Citation

  • Levon Amatuni & Bernhard Steubing & Reinout Heijungs & Tales Yamamoto & José M. Mogollón, 2024. "Deriving material composition of products using life cycle inventory databases," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 28(5), pages 1060-1072, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:28:y:2024:i:5:p:1060-1072
    DOI: 10.1111/jiec.13538
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13538
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jiec.13538?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Clemens Mostert & Stefan Bringezu, 2019. "Measuring Product Material Footprint as New Life Cycle Impact Assessment Method: Indicators and Abiotic Characterization Factors," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-19, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stefan Bringezu, 2019. "Toward Science-Based and Knowledge-Based Targets for Global Sustainable Resource Use," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-21, August.
    2. Finn-Erik Digulla & Stefan Bringezu, 2023. "Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Carbon Dioxide Mineralization Using Industrial Waste as Feedstock to Produce Cement Substitutes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-22, May.
    3. Chunbo Zhang & Mingming Hu & Benjamin Sprecher & Romain Sacchi & Xining Yang & Shiyu Yang & Teun Johannes Verhagen & Chi Zhang & Bernhard Steubing & Arnold Tukker, 2025. "Revealing the interplay between decarbonisation, circularity, and cost-effectiveness in building energy renovation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, December.
    4. Nadja von Gries & Stefan Bringezu, 2022. "Using New Spare Parts for Repair of Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment? The Material Footprint of Individual Components," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-16, February.
    5. Clemens Mostert & Stefan Bringezu, 2022. "Biotic Part of the Product Material Footprint: Comparison of Indicators Regarding Their Interpretation and Applicability," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:28:y:2024:i:5:p:1060-1072. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1088-1980 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.