IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/inecol/v26y2022i3p731-747.html

A core ontology for modeling life cycle sustainability assessment on the Semantic Web

Author

Listed:
  • Agneta Ghose
  • Matteo Lissandrini
  • Emil Riis Hansen
  • Bo Pedersen Weidema

Abstract

The use of Semantic Web and linked data increases the possibility of data accessibility, interpretability, and interoperability. It supports cross‐domain data and knowledge sharing and avoids the creation of research data silos. Widely adopted in several research domains, the use of the Semantic Web has been relatively limited with respect to sustainability assessments. A primary barrier is that the framework of the principles and technologies required to link and query data from the Semantic Web is often beyond the scope of industrial ecologists. Linking of a dataset to Semantic Web requires the development of a semantically linked core ontology in addition to the use of existing ontologies. Ontologies provide logical meaning to the data and the possibility to develop machine‐readable data format. To enable and support the uptake of semantic ontologies, we present a core ontology developed specifically to capture the data relevant for life cycle sustainability assessment. We further demonstrate the utility of the ontology by using it to integrate data relevant to sustainability assessments, such as EXIOBASE and the Yale Stocks and Flow Database to the Semantic Web. These datasets can be accessed by the machine‐readable endpoint using SPARQL, a semantic query language. The present work provides the foundation necessary to enhance the use of Semantic Web with respect to sustainability assessments. Finally, we provide our perspective on the challenges toward the adoption of Semantic Web technologies and technical solutions that can address these challenges.

Suggested Citation

  • Agneta Ghose & Matteo Lissandrini & Emil Riis Hansen & Bo Pedersen Weidema, 2022. "A core ontology for modeling life cycle sustainability assessment on the Semantic Web," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(3), pages 731-747, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:26:y:2022:i:3:p:731-747
    DOI: 10.1111/jiec.13220
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13220
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jiec.13220?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edgar Hertwich & Niko Heeren & Brandon Kuczenski & Guillaume Majeau†Bettez & Rupert J. Myers & Stefan Pauliuk & Konstantin Stadler & Reid Lifset, 2018. "Nullius in Verba: Advancing Data Transparency in Industrial Ecology," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 22(1), pages 6-17, February.
    2. Stefano Merciai & Jannick Schmidt, 2018. "Methodology for the Construction of Global Multi†Regional Hybrid Supply and Use Tables for the EXIOBASE v3 Database," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 22(3), pages 516-531, June.
    3. Stefan Pauliuk & Niko Heeren & Mohammad Mahadi Hasan & Daniel B. Müller, 2019. "A general data model for socioeconomic metabolism and its implementation in an industrial ecology data commons prototype," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 23(5), pages 1016-1027, October.
    4. Mohamed Raouf Ghali & Jean‐Marc Frayret, 2019. "Social Semantic Web Framework for Industrial Synergies Initiation," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 23(3), pages 726-738, June.
    5. Joyce Cooper & Michael Noon & Chris Jones & Ezra Kahn & Peter Arbuckle, 2013. "Big Data in Life Cycle Assessment," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 17(6), pages 796-799, December.
    6. Troullaki, Katerina & Rozakis, Stelios & Kostakis, Vasilis, 2021. "Bridging barriers in sustainability research: Α review from sustainability science to life cycle sustainability assessment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bagstad, Kenneth J. & Balbi, Stefano & Adamo, Greta & Athanasiadis, Ioannis N. & Affinito, Flavio & Willcock, Simon & Magrach, Ainhoa & Hayashi, Kiichiro & Harmáčková, Zuzana V. & Niamir, Aidin & Smet, 2025. "Interoperability for ecosystem service assessments: Why, how, who, and for whom?," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    2. Brenda Miranda Xicotencatl & René Kleijn & Sander van Nielen & Franco Donati & Benjamin Sprecher & Arnold Tukker, 2023. "Data implementation matters: Effect of software choice and LCI database evolution on a comparative LCA study of permanent magnets," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(5), pages 1252-1265, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hanspeter Wieland & Manfred Lenzen & Arne Geschke & Jacob Fry & Dominik Wiedenhofer & Nina Eisenmenger & Johannes Schenk & Stefan Giljum, 2022. "The PIOLab: Building global physical input–output tables in a virtual laboratory," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(3), pages 683-703, June.
    2. Jan Streeck & Stefan Pauliuk & Hanspeter Wieland & Dominik Wiedenhofer, 2023. "A review of methods to trace material flows into final products in dynamic material flow analysis: From industry shipments in physical units to monetary input–output tables, Part 1," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(2), pages 436-456, April.
    3. Stefan Pauliuk & Niko Heeren, 2020. "ODYM—An open software framework for studying dynamic material systems: Principles, implementation, and data structures," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(3), pages 446-458, June.
    4. P. James Joyce & Anna Björklund, 2022. "Futura: A new tool for transparent and shareable scenario analysis in prospective life cycle assessment," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(1), pages 134-144, February.
    5. Junming Zhu, 2020. "Suggested use? On evidence‐based decision‐making in industrial ecology and beyond," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(5), pages 943-950, October.
    6. Diallo, Mbaye Fall & Diop-Sall, Fatou & Leroux, Erick & Vachon, Marc-Antoine, 2022. "How do tourism sustainability and nature affinity affect social engagement propensity? The central roles of nature conservation attitude and personal tourist experience," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    7. Lombardi, Francesco & Rocco, Matteo Vincenzo & Colombo, Emanuela, 2019. "A multi-layer energy modelling methodology to assess the impact of heat-electricity integration strategies: The case of the residential cooking sector in Italy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 1249-1260.
    8. Sergio Barile & Clara Bassano & Raffaele D’Amore & Paolo Piciocchi & Marialuisa Saviano & Pietro Vito, 2021. "Insights of Digital Transformation Processes in Industrial Symbiosis from the Viable Systems Approach ( vSa )," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-14, August.
    9. Francesco Bandarin & Enrico Ciciotti & Marco Cremaschi & Giovanna Madera & Paolo Perulli & Diana Shendrikova, 2020. "Which Future for Cities after COVID-19 An international Survey," Reports, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, October.
    10. Ma-Lin Song & Ron Fisher & Jian-Lin Wang & Lian-Biao Cui, 2018. "Environmental performance evaluation with big data: theories and methods," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 270(1), pages 459-472, November.
    11. Nicolò Golinucci & Nicolò Stevanato & Federica Inzoli & Mohammad Amin Tahavori & Negar Namazifard & Lamya Hussain & Benedetta Camilli & Matteo Vincenzo Rocco & Emanuela Colombo, 2020. "Comprehensive and Integrated Impact Assessment Framework for Development Policies Evaluation: Definition and Application To Kenya," Reports, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, November.
    12. Nikolaos Kalyviotis, 2025. "Life cycle assessment tools for road design: analysing linearity assumptions," Papers 2506.13896, arXiv.org.
    13. Anna M. Walker & Alberto Simboli & Walter J. V. Vermeulen & Andrea Raggi, 2024. "Adopting a socio‐material perspective on life cycle assessment: Environmental impacts of circular tableware systems in Italy's bioplastics context," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), pages 3423-3439, August.
    14. Roope Husgafvel, 2021. "Exploring Social Sustainability Handprint—Part 1: Handprint and Life Cycle Thinking and Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-36, October.
    15. Katerina Troullaki & Stelios Rozakis & Kostas Latoufis & Chris Giotitsas & Christina Priavolou & Fausto Freire, 2022. "Sustainable Rural Electrification: Harnessing a Cosmolocal Wind," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-16, June.
    16. Jaime Nieto & Pedro B. Moyano & Diego Moyano & Luis Javier Miguel, 2023. "Is energy intensity a driver of structural change? Empirical evidence from the global economy," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(1), pages 283-296, February.
    17. Joanna Šukasiewicz & Bartłomiej Bajan, 2024. "Farm Gate Energy Intensity of Food Production in Poland - Considering the Physical and Economic Aspects of Production," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 14(4), pages 216-225, July.
    18. Roel Delahaye & Vivian S. C. Tunn & Arnold Tukker, 2023. "Developing a material flow monitor for the Netherlands from national statistical data," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(2), pages 408-422, April.
    19. Chris Kennedy & Reid Lifset, 2020. "Winners of the 2019 Graedel Prizes: The Journal of Industrial Ecology Best Paper Prizes," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(5), pages 940-942, October.
    20. Yafei Cui & Lili Li & Yiwu Zeng & Hengyi Zhang & Baogang Li, 2025. "Big data products and income inequality of e-commerce farmers: evidence from China," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:26:y:2022:i:3:p:731-747. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1088-1980 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.