IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/inecol/v23y2019i4p972-985.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Life cycle assessment of industrial symbiosis: A critical review of relevant reference scenarios

Author

Listed:
  • Lynda Aissani
  • Antoine Lacassagne
  • Jean‐Baptiste Bahers
  • Samuel Le Féon

Abstract

This paper highlights the methods and parameters used to define and design a reference scenario to be compared with an industrial symbiosis (IS) scenario using the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology. To this end, a critical review was conducted of 26 peer‐reviewed papers using LCA in the field of IS. The analysis focuses on the definition and design of reference scenarios through five cross‐analyses to determine correlations between the type and the number of reference scenarios and the type of IS scenarios studied and also some LCA characteristics such as the functional unit, the type of data used, and the use of sensitivity analysis. Results show that the definition of reference scenarios depends mainly on the type of IS scenario considered. For a current IS developed at an industrial scale, the suitable reference scenario is mainly a hypothetical nonsymbiotic reference scenario. For a prospective IS, the suitable reference scenario is mainly a current nonsymbiotic reference scenario. Due to this critical review, the problem of variability of reference scenarios emerges. To resolve it, the authors analyze different reference scenarios or use sensitivity analysis. What is more, territorial aspects are rarely taken into account in the design of reference scenarios. It is clearly a gap for LCA of IS because of the influence of territorial factors. The new research challenge is to include the consideration of territorial aspects to define and design the worst‐ and best‐case reference scenarios to assess strict environmental performances of IS.

Suggested Citation

  • Lynda Aissani & Antoine Lacassagne & Jean‐Baptiste Bahers & Samuel Le Féon, 2019. "Life cycle assessment of industrial symbiosis: A critical review of relevant reference scenarios," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 23(4), pages 972-985, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:23:y:2019:i:4:p:972-985
    DOI: 10.1111/jiec.12842
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12842
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jiec.12842?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xuesong Xu & Yun Su & Hongyan Shao & Songqiang Huang & Gengchen Liu, 2023. "Evaluation of symbiotic of waste resources ecosystem: a case study of Hunan Miluo Recycling Economy Industrial Park in China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 1131-1150, February.
    2. Hafiz Haq & Petri Välisuo & Seppo Niemi, 2021. "Modelling Sustainable Industrial Symbiosis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, February.
    3. Luca Fraccascia & Vahid Yazdanpanah & Guido Capelleveen & Devrim Murat Yazan, 2021. "Energy-based industrial symbiosis: a literature review for circular energy transition," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 4791-4825, April.
    4. Michael Martin, 2020. "Evaluating the environmental performance of producing soil and surfaces through industrial symbiosis," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(3), pages 626-638, June.
    5. Alexander Hedlund & Olof Björkqvist & Anders Nilsson & Per Engstrand, 2022. "Energy Optimization in a Paper Mill Enabled by a Three-Site Energy Cooperation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-12, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:23:y:2019:i:4:p:972-985. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1088-1980 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.