IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

"Urban Outcasts": A Contextualized Outlook on Advanced Marginality




This comment on "Urban Outcasts" appreciates Wacquant's awareness of contextual difference and his effort to theorize advanced marginality. Two critical remarks are formulated regarding the use of the polarization thesis as the backdrop for analyzing advanced marginality (which, in my view, goes against the contextual sensitivity of the analysis), and the neglect of the neighbourhood effect literature, which is summarily discarded. The second half of the comment is devoted to a brief discussion of advanced marginality in South European cities and particularly in Athens. It is, therefore, a discussion that contextualizes some of the features that Wacquant proposes for advanced marginality in terms of their occurrence and meaning within a different path towards post-Fordism and a persistently residual welfare regime (that may bear some similarity with conditions in some other parts of the world, such as South America). Copyright (c) 2009 The Author. Journal Compilation(c) 2009 Joint Editors and Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Maloutas, 2009. ""Urban Outcasts": A Contextualized Outlook on Advanced Marginality," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 828-834, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:33:y:2009:i:3:p:828-834

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    File Function: link to full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Terje Wessel, 2001. "Losing Control? Inequality and Social Divisions in Oslo," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(7), pages 889-906, October.
    2. R. Alan Walks, 2001. "The Social Ecology of the Post-Fordist/Global City? Economic Restructuring and Socio-spatial Polarisation in the Toronto Urban Region," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 38(3), pages 407-447, March.
    3. Mari Vaattovaara & Matti Kortteinen, 2003. "Beyond Polarisation versus Professionalisation? A Case Study of the Development of the Helsinki Region, Finland," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(11), pages 2127-2145, October.
    4. Ian Gordon & Vassilis Monastiriotis, 2006. "Urban Size, Spatial Segregation and Inequality in Educational Outcomes," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(1), pages 213-236, January.
    5. Chris Hamnett, 1996. "Social Polarisation, Economic Restructuring and Welfare State Regimes," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 33(8), pages 1407-1430, October.
    6. Donna Ginther & Robert Haveman & Barbara Wolfe, 2000. "Neighborhood Attributes as Determinants of Children's Outcomes: How Robust Are the Relationships?," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 35(4), pages 603-642.
    7. Thomas Maloutas, 2007. "Segregation, Social Polarization and Immigration in Athens during the 1990s: Theoretical Expectations and Contextual Difference," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 733-758, December.
    8. Thomas Maloutas, 2001. "Vertical Social Differentiation in Athens: Alternative or Complement to Community Segregation?," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(4), pages 699-716, December.
    9. Scott Baum, 1997. "Sydney, Australia: A Global City? Testing the Social Polarisation Thesis," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 34(11), pages 1881-1902, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:33:y:2009:i:3:p:828-834. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing) or (Christopher F. Baum). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.