IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v11y2020is2p40-46.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

State Intervention Does Not Support the Development of the Media Sector: Lessons from Korea and Japan

Author

Listed:
  • Nissim Otmazgin

Abstract

Contemporary media production in East Asia has been booming in recent decades, reaching consumers of various nationalities to an extent unseen before. Concurrently, various collaborations in the production and promotion of movies, TV programs, animation, videogames, music, and the like have intensified and become more effective in delivering cultural content across national borders. The state in East Asia, once considered a custodian of local culture and a censor of foreign influences, has gradually changed its position and now views media production and its export as an integral part of market activity beneficial for both economy and diplomacy. Drawing upon governmental reports and interviews with government officials and media industry personnel in Korea and Japan, this paper examines the way the state reacts to the massive production and export of media culture, its attempt to integrate it within its developmental economic model, and the bureaucratic restructuring this process entails. The central argument presented is that state policy toward the media sector, and the abundance of institutions dealing with this sector in Korea and Japan, are the result of the growth of market‐led media production and globalization. In other words, media industry development is not the result of policy, policy is the result of media industry development. In a wider context, this paper aims to better conceptualize the relations between state policy and media production in East Asia and the dynamics of industrial globalization under state guidance.

Suggested Citation

  • Nissim Otmazgin, 2020. "State Intervention Does Not Support the Development of the Media Sector: Lessons from Korea and Japan," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 11(S2), pages 40-46, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:11:y:2020:i:s2:p:40-46
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.12821
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12821
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.12821?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eyal Ben-Ari & Nissim Otmazgin, 2020. "Creativity and Innovation in the Media and Cultural Industries: Setting an Agenda for the Social and Human Sciences," Creative Economy, in: Nissim Otmazgin & Eyal Ben-Ari (ed.), Creative Context, chapter 0, pages 3-14, Springer.
    2. Carin Holroyd, 2019. "Digital content promotion in Japan and South Korea: Government strategies for an emerging economic sector," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 6(3), pages 290-307, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:thr:techub:10028:y:2022:i:1:p:849-859 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Jana Sandra & Yuliawan Yuliawan, 2022. "The Importance of Digital Literacy for Society 5.0 : A Phenomenological Approach," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 28(1), pages 849-859, February.
    3. Masuda, Hisashi & Han, Spring H. & Lee, Jungwoo, 2022. "Impacts of influencer attributes on purchase intentions in social media influencer marketing: Mediating roles of characterizations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    4. Yao Li & Yugang He & Renhong Wu, 2023. "Traversing the Macroeconomic Terrain: An Exploration of South Korea’s Economic Responsiveness to Cross-Border E-Commerce Production Technology Alterations in the Global Arena," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-20, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:11:y:2020:i:s2:p:40-46. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.