IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/finrev/v32y1997i1p163-84.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regulation and Systematic Risk in the Electric Utility Industry: A Test of the Buffering Hypothesis

Author

Listed:
  • Davidson, Wallace N, III
  • Rangan, Nanda
  • Rosenstein, Stuart

Abstract

In this paper, the authors test Peltzman's buffering hypothesis--whether regulatory environment impacts systematic risk for regulated electric utilities. The paper differs from previous research in that an exogenously defined measure of regulatory environment, a large sample, and a method that controls for time-series and cross-sectional autocorrelation are used. The results are consistent with the buffering hypothesis but only in years of increasing input factor prices for the utilities. Using causality tests, the results also show that it is the regulatory environment that influences systematic risk and not vice versa. Copyright 1997 by MIT Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Davidson, Wallace N, III & Rangan, Nanda & Rosenstein, Stuart, 1997. "Regulation and Systematic Risk in the Electric Utility Industry: A Test of the Buffering Hypothesis," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 32(1), pages 163-184, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:finrev:v:32:y:1997:i:1:p:163-84
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Schäffner, Daniel, 2007. "Bestimmung des Ausgangsniveaus der Kosten und des kalkulatorischen Eigenkapitalzinssatzes für eine Anreizregulierung des Energiesektors," WIK Discussion Papers 293, WIK Wissenschaftliches Institut für Infrastruktur und Kommunikationsdienste GmbH.
    2. Anderson, Ronald C. & Fraser, Donald R., 2000. "Corporate control, bank risk taking, and the health of the banking industry," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 24(8), pages 1383-1398, August.
    3. Antia, Murad & Pantzalis, Christos & Park, Jung Chul, 2010. "CEO decision horizon and firm performance: An empirical investigation," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 288-301, June.
    4. Jiraporn, Pornsit & Kim, Young Sang & Davidson III, Wallace N., 2008. "Multiple directorships and corporate diversification," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 418-435, June.
    5. Afzalur Rashid, 2013. "CEO duality and agency cost: evidence from Bangladesh," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 17(4), pages 989-1008, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:finrev:v:32:y:1997:i:1:p:163-84. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/efaaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.