IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ecanth/v5y2018i1p71-82.html

“Once you support, you are supported†: Entrepreneurship and reintegration among ex†prisoners in Gulu, northern Uganda

Author

Listed:
  • Hannah Jane Marshall

Abstract

This article explores the divergences between ex†prisoners' use of entrepreneurship as a tool for rebuilding social ties and the vision of entrepreneurship provided by Mission Forward, a European†funded, Ugandan†run nongovernmental organization that provides ex†prisoners with entrepreneurship training. Forty†six interviews were conducted over two months with Mission Forward staff and with ex†prisoners participating in the entrepreneurship training program in Gulu, northern Uganda. These interviews found that Mission Forward's official position, like that of many providers of criminal justice services, was to view crime as resulting from one primary deficiency in personhood: idleness. To rectify this, their policy was to fashion prototypical neoliberal entrepreneurs: self†motivated and self†reliant individualists whose primary concern is making money and who could achieve this goal no matter what the circumstances. In contrast, ex†prisoners experienced a loss of personhood when they became marked as criminals by their friends and neighbors. To address this, ex†prisoners were concerned with using the contracts, exchanges, and interactions associated with their entrepreneurial ventures to rebuild the social ties that their crimes and subsequent incarceration had damaged and thereby reclaim personhood. This article argues that these divergent uses of entrepreneurship as a rehabilitative and reintegrative tool provide new insights into the nature of entrepreneurship and into the establishment and reestablishment of both personhood and social ties through economic exchange.

Suggested Citation

  • Hannah Jane Marshall, 2018. "“Once you support, you are supported†: Entrepreneurship and reintegration among ex†prisoners in Gulu, northern Uganda," Economic Anthropology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(1), pages 71-82, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ecanth:v:5:y:2018:i:1:p:71-82
    DOI: 10.1002/sea2.12103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sea2.12103
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sea2.12103?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Benedetta Rossi, 2004. "Revisiting Foucauldian Approaches: Power Dynamics in Development Projects," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(6), pages 1-29.
    2. Harvey, David, 2007. "A Brief History of Neoliberalism," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199283279.
    3. Brandon D. Lundy & Mark Patterson & Alex O'Neill, 2017. "Drivers and deterrents of entrepreneurial enterprise in the risk-prone Global South," Economic Anthropology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 4(1), pages 65-81, January.
    4. Mark Duffield, 2002. "Social Reconstruction and the Radicalization of Development: Aid as a Relation of Global Liberal Governance," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 33(5), pages 1049-1071, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ipshita Ghosh, 2020. "Investment, value, and the making of entrepreneurship in India," Economic Anthropology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 7(2), pages 190-202, June.
    2. Michiel Verver & Juliette Koning, 2024. "An anthropological perspective on contextualizing entrepreneurship," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 62(2), pages 649-665, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robert Pollin, 2008. "Considerations on Interest Rate Exogeneity," Working Papers wp177, Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
    2. Howard Stein, 2012. "The Neoliberal Policy Paradigm and the Great Recession," Panoeconomicus, Savez ekonomista Vojvodine, Novi Sad, Serbia, vol. 59(4), pages 421-440, September.
    3. Jamie Redman, 2020. "The Benefit Sanction: A Correctional Device or a Weapon of Disgust?," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 25(1), pages 84-100, March.
    4. Jonathan Whittall, 2009. "‘It's like talking to a brick wall’," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 9(1), pages 37-53, January.
    5. Ryan Higgitt, 2013. "Colonialism, Casteism and Development: South-South Cooperation as a ‘New’ Development Paradigm," Working Papers 112, International Policy Centre.
    6. Hilary Silver & Alan Scott & Yuri Kazepov, 2010. "Participation in Urban Contention and Deliberation," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 453-477, September.
    7. Bernd Schmitt & J Joško Brakus & Alessandro Biraglia, 2022. "Consumption Ideology [Ideology and Terror: A Novel Form of Government]," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 49(1), pages 74-95.
    8. Grzegorz W. Kolodko, 2009. "A Two-thirds Rate of Success: Polish Transformation and Economic Development, 1989-2008," WIDER Working Paper Series RP2009-14, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    9. Nissim, Gadi & Simon, Tomer, 2021. "The future of labor unions in the age of automation and at the dawn of AI," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    10. Paranque, Bernard & Revelli, Christophe, 2019. "Ethico-economic analysis of impact finance: The case of Green Bonds," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 57-66.
    11. Andrew Crookston, 2012. "Thomas J. Bassett and Alex Winter-Nelson: The atlas of world hunger," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 29(2), pages 277-278, June.
    12. Cohen, Joseph N, 2010. "Neoliberalism’s relationship with economic growth in the developing world: Was it the power of the market or the resolution of financial crisis?," MPRA Paper 24527, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Sirkku K. Hellsten, 2012. "Transitional Justice and Aid," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2012-006, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    14. Yang Shen, 2015. "Why Does the Government Fail to Improve the Living Conditions of Migrant Workers in Shanghai? Reflections on the Policies and the Implementations of Public Rental Housing under Neoliberalism," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 2(1), pages 58-74, January.
    15. Veselin Draskovic & Mimo Draskovic, 2012. "Institutional Nihilism As A Basis For Anti-Development Policy," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 8(1), pages 119-136.
    16. Magdalena Correo Henao & Daniela Amaya Castro & Mario Andrés Ospina Ramírez & Federico Suárez Ricaurte, 2021. "Pobreza y desigualdad prospectiva 2030. XXI jornadas de derecho constitucional constitucionalismo en ransformación. Prospectiva 2030," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Derecho, number 1298.
    17. Naomi Robert & Tammara Soma & Kent Mullinix, 2025. "Neoliberal growth vs food system democratization: narrative analysis of Canadian federal and civil society agri-food policy," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 42(2), pages 923-943, June.
    18. Robin Roff, 2009. "No alternative? The politics and history of non-GMO certification," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 26(4), pages 351-363, December.
    19. Lise Arena & Leonard Minkes, 2019. "The virtues of dialogue between academics and businessmen," Post-Print hal-01620574, HAL.
    20. Ju Li, 2021. "Open Sesame? The Paradoxical Development of C2C E-commerce in China," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 53(2), pages 266-280, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ecanth:v:5:y:2018:i:1:p:71-82. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=2330-4847 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.