IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/devpol/v44y2026i3ne70066.html

Citizens' aid preferences amid state collapse: Experimental evidence from Haiti

Author

Listed:
  • Ana Isabel López García
  • Sarah Berens

Abstract

Motivation Citizens' preferences signal which intermediaries they view as legitimate, trustworthy, and responsive, as well as capable of guiding donor decisions about aid‐delivery channels. However, little is known about these preferences in extremely fragile environments, where aid is both the most urgently needed and the most difficult to deliver. Purpose This study examines whom citizens believe should deliver reconstruction and relief aid in extreme fragility situations, how these attitudes shift when state authority collapses, and whether preferences diverge across socioeconomic groups. Methods The analysis is based on an original online survey conducted in Haiti (N = 2,001) in winter 2023/2024. Respondents evaluated how strongly they supported aid delivery through different actors in a vignette experiment. While fielding the survey, gangs launched a revolt which triggered the collapse of the central government. This created a natural experiment to compare attitudes before and after institutional breakdown. Findings State collapse reshaped citizen preferences, but not as most of the literature would have predicted. Citizens did not gravitate toward foreign NGOs, whose legitimacy in Haiti is weakened by well‐documented abuses and programming that is disconnected from local needs. Instead, the most significant shifts concerned local actors, especially municipalities, who are no less corrupt than the central government. Importantly, affluent and non‐affluent respondents moved in opposite directions. The affluent preferred channels that align with prevailing donor practices, while the non‐affluent—those most likely to be aid recipients—shifted toward municipalities. Policy implications Findings challenge the common donor practice of routing aid through external, non‐state channels. In contexts with a history of aid‐related harm, this risks further eroding trust. However, acting on citizens' signals requires care: if donors respond to the most audible local voices, they risk aligning aid allocation with the preferences of more affluent groups rather than those of intended beneficiaries. Municipal channels, while preferred by the non‐affluent, remain vulnerable to capture by elites or armed groups. In conflict settings, stated preferences may reflect strategic accommodation rather than genuine endorsement. While the focus is on Haiti, similar dilemmas could be unfolding across other fragile, conflict‐affected settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Ana Isabel López García & Sarah Berens, 2026. "Citizens' aid preferences amid state collapse: Experimental evidence from Haiti," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 44(3), May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:44:y:2026:i:3:n:e70066
    DOI: 10.1111/dpr.70066
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.70066
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/dpr.70066?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bakaki, Zorzeta & Dorussen, Han, 2023. "Trust in peacebuilding organizations: A survey experiment in Haiti," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    2. Michael G. Findley & Helen V. Milner & Daniel L. Nielson, 2017. "The choice among aid donors: The effects of multilateral vs. bilateral aid on recipient behavioral support," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 307-334, June.
    3. Platteau, Jean-Philippe & Gaspart, Frederic, 2003. "The Risk of Resource Misappropriation in Community-Driven Development," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 31(10), pages 1687-1703, October.
    4. Dietrich,Simone, 2021. "States, Markets, and Foreign Aid," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781316519202.
    5. Hainmueller, Jens, 2012. "Entropy Balancing for Causal Effects: A Multivariate Reweighting Method to Produce Balanced Samples in Observational Studies," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(1), pages 25-46, January.
    6. Helen V. Milner & Daniel L. Nielson & Michael G. Findley, 2016. "Citizen preferences and public goods: comparing preferences for foreign aid and government programs in Uganda," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 219-245, June.
    7. Anke Hoeffler & Patricia Justino, 2024. "Aid and fragile states," Chapters, in: Raj M. Desai & Shantayanan Devarajan & Jennifer L. Tobin (ed.), Handbook of Aid and Development, chapter 14, pages 225-246, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    8. Kim, Sung Eun & Park, Jong Hee & Rhee, Inbok & Yang, Joonseok, 2025. "What do aid recipients want? Public attitudes toward foreign aid in developing countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    9. Tito Cordella & Giovanni Dell'Ariccia, 2007. "Budget Support Versus Project Aid: A Theoretical Appraisal," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 117(523), pages 1260-1279, October.
    10. Fritzen, Scott A., 2007. "Can the Design of Community-Driven Development Reduce the Risk of Elite Capture? Evidence from Indonesia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 1359-1375, August.
    11. Laura Zanotti, 2010. "Cacophonies of Aid, Failed State Building and s in Haiti: setting the stage for disaster, envisioning the future," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(5), pages 755-771.
    12. Shaomeng Jia & Claudia R. Williamson, 2019. "Aid, Policies, And Growth: Why So Much Confusion?," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 37(4), pages 577-599, October.
    13. Findley, Michael G. & Harris, Adam S. & Milner, Helen V. & Nielson, Daniel L., 2017. "Who Controls Foreign Aid? Elite versus Public Perceptions of Donor Influence in Aid-Dependent Uganda," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 71(4), pages 633-663, October.
    14. Dietrich,Simone, 2021. "States, Markets, and Foreign Aid," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781009001755.
    15. Patricia Justino, 2019. "Governance Interventions in Conflict-Affected Countries," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(7), pages 1364-1378, July.
    16. Hennessy, Jack & Mortimer, Duncan & Sweeney, Rohan & Woode, Maame Esi, 2023. "Donor versus recipient preferences for aid allocation: A systematic review of stated-preference studies," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 334(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kim, Sung Eun & Park, Jong Hee & Rhee, Inbok & Yang, Joonseok, 2025. "What do aid recipients want? Public attitudes toward foreign aid in developing countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    2. Kentaro Hirose & Gabriella R. Montinola & Matthew S. Winters & Masaru Kohno, 2025. "A matter of trust: Public support for country ownership over aid," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 575-603, September.
    3. Dreher, Axel & Lang, Valentin & Reinsberg, Bernhard, 2024. "Aid effectiveness and donor motives," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    4. Austin Strange, 2025. "Influence and support for foreign aid: Evidence from the United States and China," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 443-470, September.
    5. Bau, Nicolas & Dietrich, Simone, 2025. "What geopolitical returns does ODA bring?," Kiel Working Papers 2305, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
    6. López García, Ana Isabel & Berens, Sarah, 2025. "Taxing the wealthy in Haiti: Evidence from a conjoint experiment on property tax preferences," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    7. Firchow, Pamina & Funk, Julianne & Mac Ginty, Roger, 2025. "After war ends: Aid paradigms and post-conflict preferences," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    8. Brandon Cuesta & Lucy Martin & Helen V. Milner & Daniel L. Nielson, 2021. "Foreign aid, oil revenues, and political accountability: Evidence from six experiments in Ghana and Uganda," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 521-548, July.
    9. Heinzel, Mirko & Reinsberg, Bernhard, 2024. "Trust funds and the sub-national effectiveness of development aid: Evidence from the World Bank," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    10. Dreher, Axel & Fuchs, Andreas & Langlotz, Sarah, 2019. "The effects of foreign aid on refugee flows," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 127-147.
    11. Desai, Raj M. & Olofsgård, Anders, 2019. "Can the poor organize? Public goods and self-help groups in rural India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 33-52.
    12. Grillos, Tara, 2017. "Participatory Budgeting and the Poor: Tracing Bias in a Multi-Staged Process in Solo, Indonesia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 343-358.
    13. Alessandra Tangianu & Daniel E. Esser & Heiner Janus, 2025. "Why do bureaucrats want mandatory training? A conjoint mixed‐methods analysis of individual learning preferences in German, Norwegian, and South Korean donor agencies," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 43(2), March.
    14. King, Elisabeth & Samii, Cyrus, 2014. "Fast-Track Institution Building in Conflict-Affected Countries? Insights from Recent Field Experiments," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 740-754.
    15. Bernhard Reinsberg & Daniel O Shaw & Louis Bujnoch, 2024. "Revisiting the security–development nexus: Human security and the effects of IMF adjustment programmes," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 41(1), pages 72-95, January.
    16. Hennessy, Jack & Mortimer, Duncan & Sweeney, Rohan & Woode, Maame Esi, 2025. "Donor preferences for recipient control of international development aid," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 384(C).
    17. Daniel L. Nielson & Bradley Parks & Michael J. Tierney, 2017. "International organizations and development finance: Introduction to the special issue," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 157-169, June.
    18. Lund, Jens Friis & Saito-Jensen, Moeko, 2013. "Revisiting the Issue of Elite Capture of Participatory Initiatives," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 104-112.
    19. Lauren L. Ferry & Emilie M. Hafner-Burton & Christina J. Schneider, 2020. "Catch me if you care: International development organizations and national corruption," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 767-792, October.
    20. Classen, Lauren & Humphries, Sally & FitzSimons, John & Kaaria, Susan & Jiménez, José & Sierra, Fredy & Gallardo, Omar, 2008. "Opening Participatory Spaces for the Most Marginal: Learning from Collective Action in the Honduran Hillsides," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 2402-2420, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:44:y:2026:i:3:n:e70066. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/odioruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.