IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/corgov/v15y2007i3p478-485.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Universal Owners and ESG: leaving money on the table?

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew J. Kiernan

Abstract

ESG (environmental, social and governance) issues represent both a “tragedy of the commons” and a golden opportunity for a positive system change. Universal Owners should recognise both their power and their responsibilities, and then to leverage their investment strategies to catalyse ESG improvements in their investee companies. This can be done through both stock selection and direct engagement with companies. To date, unfortunately, a myriad of largely cognitive barriers have prevented Universal Owners from mobilising their considerable investment power in this way to any significant extent. There is, however, some encouraging evidence that this is beginning to change.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew J. Kiernan, 2007. "Universal Owners and ESG: leaving money on the table?," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(3), pages 478-485, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:corgov:v:15:y:2007:i:3:p:478-485
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00580.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00580.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00580.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andreas G. F. Hoepner & Arleta A. A. Majoch & Xiao Y. Zhou, 2021. "Does an Asset Owner’s Institutional Setting Influence Its Decision to Sign the Principles for Responsible Investment?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 168(2), pages 389-414, January.
    2. Rui Coelho & Shital Jayantilal & Joao J. Ferreira, 2023. "The impact of social responsibility on corporate financial performance: A systematic literature review," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(4), pages 1535-1560, July.
    3. Alda, Mercedes, 2017. "The abilities of managers in UK pension funds. Are socially responsible managers superior?," Cuadernos de Gestión, Universidad del País Vasco - Instituto de Economía Aplicada a la Empresa (IEAE).
    4. Jeremy Galbreath, 2013. "ESG in Focus: The Australian Evidence," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 118(3), pages 529-541, December.
    5. Gaurav Talan & Gagan Deep Sharma, 2019. "Doing Well by Doing Good: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda for Sustainable Investment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-16, January.
    6. Gunnar Friede, 2019. "Why don't we see more action? A metasynthesis of the investor impediments to integrate environmental, social, and governance factors," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(6), pages 1260-1282, September.
    7. Justyna Przychodzen & Fernando Gómez-Bezares & Wojciech Przychodzen & Mikel Larreina, 2016. "ESG Issues among Fund Managers—Factors and Motives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-19, October.
    8. Andreas Hoepner & Arleta Majoch, 2016. "Pension Funds and the Principles for Responsible Investment: Multiplying Stakeholder Salience?," ICMA Centre Discussion Papers in Finance icma-dp2016-07, Henley Business School, University of Reading.
    9. Kazuhiro Okuma, 2019. "Potential mechanisms for the social regulation of economies on global and local scales: an institutional analysis of ESG investment and community renewables," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 523-541, December.
    10. Ook Lee & Hanseon Joo & Hayoung Choi & Minjong Cheon, 2022. "Proposing an Integrated Approach to Analyzing ESG Data via Machine Learning and Deep Learning Algorithms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-14, July.
    11. Arleta A Majoch & Andreas G F Hoepner & Tessa Hebb, 2014. "Sources of Stakeholder Salience in the Responsible Investment Movement: Why Do Investors Sign the Principles for Responsible Investment?," ICMA Centre Discussion Papers in Finance icma-dp2014-13, Henley Business School, University of Reading.
    12. Leonard-Călin Abrudan & Mirabela-Constanța Matei & Maria-Madela Abrudan, 2021. "Towards Sustainable Finance: Conceptualizing Future Generations as Stakeholders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-21, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:corgov:v:15:y:2007:i:3:p:478-485. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0964-8410&site=1 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.