IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/biomet/v77y2021i3p1037-1049.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Post‐selection inference for changepoint detection algorithms with application to copy number variation data

Author

Listed:
  • Sangwon Hyun
  • Kevin Z. Lin
  • Max G'Sell
  • Ryan J. Tibshirani

Abstract

Changepoint detection methods are used in many areas of science and engineering, for example, in the analysis of copy number variation data to detect abnormalities in copy numbers along the genome. Despite the broad array of available tools, methodology for quantifying our uncertainty in the strength (or the presence) of given changepoints post‐selection are lacking. Post‐selection inference offers a framework to fill this gap, but the most straightforward application of these methods results in low‐powered hypothesis tests and leaves open several important questions about practical usability. In this work, we carefully tailor post‐selection inference methods toward changepoint detection, focusing on copy number variation data. To accomplish this, we study commonly used changepoint algorithms: binary segmentation, as well as two of its most popular variants, wild and circular, and the fused lasso. We implement some of the latest developments in post‐selection inference theory, mainly auxiliary randomization. This improves the power, which requires implementations of Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms (importance sampling and hit‐and‐run sampling) to carry out our tests. We also provide recommendations for improving practical useability, detailed simulations, and example analyses on array comparative genomic hybridization as well as sequencing data.

Suggested Citation

  • Sangwon Hyun & Kevin Z. Lin & Max G'Sell & Ryan J. Tibshirani, 2021. "Post‐selection inference for changepoint detection algorithms with application to copy number variation data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 77(3), pages 1037-1049, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:77:y:2021:i:3:p:1037-1049
    DOI: 10.1111/biom.13422
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.13422
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/biom.13422?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Venkata Jandhyala & Stergios Fotopoulos & Ian MacNeill & Pengyu Liu, 2013. "Inference for single and multiple change-points in time series," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 423-446, July.
    2. Fryzlewicz, Piotr, 2014. "Wild binary segmentation for multiple change-point detection," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 57146, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cho, Haeran & Kirch, Claudia, 2022. "Bootstrap confidence intervals for multiple change points based on moving sum procedures," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael Messer, 2022. "Bivariate change point detection: Joint detection of changes in expectation and variance," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 49(2), pages 886-916, June.
    2. Chen, Zhanshou & Xu, Qiongyao & Li, Huini, 2019. "Inference for multiple change points in heavy-tailed time series via rank likelihood ratio scan statistics," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 53-56.
    3. Shi, Xuesheng & Gallagher, Colin & Lund, Robert & Killick, Rebecca, 2022. "A comparison of single and multiple changepoint techniques for time series data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    4. Bouzebda, Salim & Ferfache, Anouar Abdeldjaoued, 2023. "Asymptotic properties of semiparametric M-estimators with multiple change points," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 609(C).
    5. Lijing Ma & Andrew J. Grant & Georgy Sofronov, 2020. "Multiple change point detection and validation in autoregressive time series data," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 61(4), pages 1507-1528, August.
    6. Hajra Siddiqa & Sajid Ali & Ismail Shah, 2021. "Most recent changepoint detection in censored panel data," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 515-540, March.
    7. Michael Messer & Stefan Albert & Gaby Schneider, 2018. "The multiple filter test for change point detection in time series," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 81(6), pages 589-607, August.
    8. Pedro Galeano & Dominik Wied, 2017. "Dating multiple change points in the correlation matrix," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 26(2), pages 331-352, June.
    9. Alessandro Casini & Pierre Perron, 2021. "Change-Point Analysis of Time Series with Evolutionary Spectra," Papers 2106.02031, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2021.
    10. Bill Russell & Dooruj Rambaccussing, 2019. "Breaks and the statistical process of inflation: the case of estimating the ‘modern’ long-run Phillips curve," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 56(5), pages 1455-1475, May.
    11. Oleksandr Gromenko & Piotr Kokoszka & Matthew Reimherr, 2017. "Detection of change in the spatiotemporal mean function," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 79(1), pages 29-50, January.
    12. Ruggieri, Eric & Antonellis, Marcus, 2016. "An exact approach to Bayesian sequential change point detection," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 71-86.
    13. Daniela Jarušková, 2015. "Detecting non-simultaneous changes in means of vectors," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 24(4), pages 681-700, December.
    14. Wu Wang & Xuming He & Zhongyi Zhu, 2020. "Statistical inference for multiple change‐point models," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 47(4), pages 1149-1170, December.
    15. Davis, Richard A. & Hancock, Stacey A. & Yao, Yi-Ching, 2016. "On consistency of minimum description length model selection for piecewise autoregressions," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 194(2), pages 360-368.
    16. Qing Yang & Yu-Ning Li & Yi Zhang, 2020. "Change point detection for nonparametric regression under strongly mixing process," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 61(4), pages 1465-1506, August.
    17. Fryzlewicz, Piotr, 2020. "Detecting possibly frequent change-points: Wild Binary Segmentation 2 and steepest-drop model selection," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 103430, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    18. Kang-Ping Lu & Shao-Tung Chang, 2021. "Robust Algorithms for Change-Point Regressions Using the t -Distribution," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(19), pages 1-28, September.
    19. Holger Dette & Kevin Kokot & Stanislav Volgushev, 2020. "Testing relevant hypotheses in functional time series via self‐normalization," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 82(3), pages 629-660, July.
    20. Maria Mohr & Natalie Neumeyer, 2021. "Nonparametric volatility change detection," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 48(2), pages 529-548, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:77:y:2021:i:3:p:1037-1049. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0006-341X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.