IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/biomet/v74y2018i1p135-144.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Model†based bootstrapping when correcting for measurement error with application to logistic regression

Author

Listed:
  • John P. Buonaccorsi
  • Giovanni Romeo
  • Magne Thoresen

Abstract

When fitting regression models, measurement error in any of the predictors typically leads to biased coefficients and incorrect inferences. A plethora of methods have been proposed to correct for this. Obtaining standard errors and confidence intervals using the corrected estimators can be challenging and, in addition, there is concern about remaining bias in the corrected estimators. The bootstrap, which is one option to address these problems, has received limited attention in this context. It has usually been employed by simply resampling observations, which, while suitable in some situations, is not always formally justified. In addition, the simple bootstrap does not allow for estimating bias in non†linear models, including logistic regression. Model†based bootstrapping, which can potentially estimate bias in addition to being robust to the original sampling or whether the measurement error variance is constant or not, has received limited attention. However, it faces challenges that are not present in handling regression models with no measurement error. This article develops new methods for model†based bootstrapping when correcting for measurement error in logistic regression with replicate measures. The methodology is illustrated using two examples, and a series of simulations are carried out to assess and compare the simple and model†based bootstrap methods, as well as other standard methods. While not always perfect, the model†based approaches offer some distinct improvements over the other methods.

Suggested Citation

  • John P. Buonaccorsi & Giovanni Romeo & Magne Thoresen, 2018. "Model†based bootstrapping when correcting for measurement error with application to logistic regression," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(1), pages 135-144, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:74:y:2018:i:1:p:135-144
    DOI: 10.1111/biom.12730
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.12730
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/biom.12730?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Junyu Zheng & H. Christopher Frey, 2005. "Quantitative Analysis of Variability and Uncertainty with Known Measurement Error: Methodology and Case Study," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(3), pages 663-675, June.
    2. Laine Thomas & Leonard Stefanski & Marie Davidian, 2011. "A Moment-Adjusted Imputation Method for Measurement Error Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(4), pages 1461-1470, December.
    3. Devanarayan, Viswanath & Stefanski, Leonard A., 2002. "Empirical simulation extrapolation for measurement error models with replicate measurements," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 59(3), pages 219-225, October.
    4. Carroll, Raymond J. & Delaigle, Aurore & Hall, Peter, 2011. "Testing and Estimating Shape-Constrained Nonparametric Density and Regression in the Presence of Measurement Error," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 106(493), pages 191-202.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gai, Prasanna & Tong, Eric, 2022. "Information spillovers of US monetary policy," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eduardo L. Montoya & Wendy Meiring, 2016. "An F-type test for detecting departure from monotonicity in a functional linear model," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 322-337, June.
    2. Li, Mengyan & Ma, Yanyuan & Li, Runze, 2019. "Semiparametric regression for measurement error model with heteroscedastic error," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 320-338.
    3. Hassan Doosti & Peter Hall, 2016. "Making a non-parametric density estimator more attractive, and more accurate, by data perturbation," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 78(2), pages 445-462, March.
    4. J. R. Lockwood & Daniel F. McCaffrey, 2017. "Simulation-Extrapolation with Latent Heteroskedastic Error Variance," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 82(3), pages 717-736, September.
    5. Carroll, Raymond J. & Delaigle, Aurore & Hall, Peter, 2009. "Nonparametric Prediction in Measurement Error Models," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 104(487), pages 993-1003.
    6. Pang Du & Christopher F. Parmeter & Jeffrey S. Racine, 2012. "Nonparametric Kernel Regression with Multiple Predictors and Multiple Shape Constraints," Department of Economics Working Papers 2012-08, McMaster University.
    7. Farzaneh Boroumand & Mohammad Taghi Shakeri & Touka Banaee & Hamidreza Pourreza & Hassan Doosti, 2021. "An Analysis of the Areas Occupied by Vessels in the Ocular Surface of Diabetic Patients: An Application of a Nonparametric Tilted Additive Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-14, April.
    8. Aurora Greta Ruggeri & Laura Gabrielli & Massimiliano Scarpa, 2020. "Energy Retrofit in European Building Portfolios: A Review of Five Key Aspects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-38, September.
    9. Zhang, Jun & Feng, Zhenghui & Zhou, Bu, 2014. "A revisit to correlation analysis for distortion measurement error data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 116-129.
    10. Abhra Sarkar & Bani K. Mallick & Raymond J. Carroll, 2014. "Bayesian semiparametric regression in the presence of conditionally heteroscedastic measurement and regression errors," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 70(4), pages 823-834, December.
    11. J. R. Lockwood & Daniel F. McCaffrey, 2014. "Correcting for Test Score Measurement Error in ANCOVA Models for Estimating Treatment Effects," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 39(1), pages 22-52, February.
    12. Wu, Ximing & Sickles, Robin, 2018. "Semiparametric estimation under shape constraints," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 6(C), pages 74-89.
    13. Raymond J. Carroll & Aurore Delaigle & Peter Hall, 2007. "Non‐parametric regression estimation from data contaminated by a mixture of Berkson and classical errors," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 69(5), pages 859-878, November.
    14. Laura Gabrielli & Aurora Greta Ruggeri & Massimiliano Scarpa, 2023. "Roadmap to a Sustainable Energy System: Is Uncertainty a Major Barrier to Investments for Building Energy Retrofit Projects in Wide City Compartments?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-21, May.
    15. Gao, Zhikun & Tang, Yanlin & Wang, Huixia Judy & Wu, Guangying K. & Lin, Jeff, 2020. "Automatic identification of curve shapes with applications to ultrasonic vocalization," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    16. Cécile Durot & Piet Groeneboom & Hendrik P. Lopuhaä, 2013. "Testing equality of functions under monotonicity constraints," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(4), pages 939-970, December.
    17. Chun Wang & Gongjun Xu & Xue Zhang, 2019. "Correction for Item Response Theory Latent Trait Measurement Error in Linear Mixed Effects Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 84(3), pages 673-700, September.
    18. De Nadai, Michele & Lewbel, Arthur, 2016. "Nonparametric errors in variables models with measurement errors on both sides of the equation," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 191(1), pages 19-32.
    19. Guido Sassi & Bernardo Ruggeri, 2008. "Uncertainty Evaluation of Human Risk Analysis (HRA) of Chemicals by Multiple Exposure Routes," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5), pages 1343-1356, October.
    20. Sukhbir Singh & Kanchan Jain & Suresh Sharma, 2014. "Replicated measurement error model under exact linear restrictions," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 253-274, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:74:y:2018:i:1:p:135-144. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0006-341X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.