IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/biomet/v62y2006i1p10-182.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bayesian Robust Inference for Differential Gene Expression in Microarrays with Multiple Samples

Author

Listed:
  • Raphael Gottardo
  • Adrian E. Raftery
  • Ka Yee Yeung
  • Roger E. Bumgarner

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Raphael Gottardo & Adrian E. Raftery & Ka Yee Yeung & Roger E. Bumgarner, 2006. "Bayesian Robust Inference for Differential Gene Expression in Microarrays with Multiple Samples," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(1), pages 10-18, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:62:y:2006:i:1:p:10-18:2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00397.x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mahlet G. Tadesse & Joseph G. Ibrahim & George L. Mutter, 2003. "Identification of Differentially Expressed Genes in High-Density Oligonucleotide Arrays Accounting for the Quantification Limits of the Technology," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 59(3), pages 542-554, September.
    2. Efron, Bradley, 2004. "Large-Scale Simultaneous Hypothesis Testing: The Choice of a Null Hypothesis," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 99, pages 96-104, January.
    3. J. Besag & D. Higdon, 1999. "Bayesian analysis of agricultural field experiments," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 61(4), pages 691-746.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hong, Zhaoping & Lian, Heng, 2012. "BOPA: A Bayesian hierarchical model for outlier expression detection," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(12), pages 4146-4156.
    2. Elisa C. J. Maria & Isabel Salazar & Luis Sanz & Miguel A. Gómez-Villegas, 2020. "Using Copula to Model Dependence When Testing Multiple Hypotheses in DNA Microarray Experiments: A Bayesian Approximation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-22, September.
    3. Hironori Fujisawa & Takayuki Sakaguchi, 2012. "Optimal significance analysis of microarray data in a class of tests whose null statistic can be constructed," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 21(2), pages 280-300, June.
    4. Grisel Maribel Britos & Silvia María Ojeda, 2019. "Robust estimation for spatial autoregressive processes based on bounded innovation propagation representations," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 1315-1335, September.
    5. Haibing Zhao & Xinping Cui, 2020. "Constructing confidence intervals for selected parameters," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(4), pages 1098-1108, December.
    6. Joaquim Casellas & Luis Varona, 2012. "Modeling Skewness in Human Transcriptomes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(6), pages 1-5, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Raphael Gottardo & Adrian E. Raftery & Ka Yee Yeung & Roger E. Bumgarner, 2006. "Bayesian Robust Inference for Differential Gene Expression in Microarrays with Multiple Samples," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(1), pages 10-18, March.
    2. Pounds Stanley B. & Gao Cuilan L. & Zhang Hui, 2012. "Empirical Bayesian Selection of Hypothesis Testing Procedures for Analysis of Sequence Count Expression Data," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 11(5), pages 1-32, October.
    3. Shigeyuki Matsui & Hisashi Noma, 2011. "Estimating Effect Sizes of Differentially Expressed Genes for Power and Sample-Size Assessments in Microarray Experiments," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(4), pages 1225-1235, December.
    4. Woojoo Lee & Hans‐Peter Piepho & Youngjo Lee, 2021. "Resolving the ambiguity of random‐effects models with singular precision matrix," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 75(4), pages 482-499, November.
    5. Won, Joong-Ho & Lim, Johan & Yu, Donghyeon & Kim, Byung Soo & Kim, Kyunga, 2014. "Monotone false discovery rate," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 86-93.
    6. van Wieringen, Wessel N. & Stam, Koen A. & Peeters, Carel F.W. & van de Wiel, Mark A., 2020. "Updating of the Gaussian graphical model through targeted penalized estimation," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    7. Ian W. McKeague & Min Qian, 2015. "An Adaptive Resampling Test for Detecting the Presence of Significant Predictors," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(512), pages 1422-1433, December.
    8. Angela Schörgendorfer & Adam J. Branscum & Timothy E. Hanson, 2013. "A Bayesian Goodness of Fit Test and Semiparametric Generalization of Logistic Regression with Measurement Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 69(2), pages 508-519, June.
    9. Han, Bing & Dalal, Siddhartha R., 2012. "A Bernstein-type estimator for decreasing density with application to p-value adjustments," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 427-437.
    10. Dalia Valencia & Rosa E. Lillo & Juan Romo, 2019. "A Kendall correlation coefficient between functional data," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 13(4), pages 1083-1103, December.
    11. Kline, Patrick & Walters, Christopher, 2019. "Audits as Evidence: Experiments, Ensembles, and Enforcement," Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, Working Paper Series qt3z72m9kn, Institute of Industrial Relations, UC Berkeley.
    12. He, Yi & Pan, Wei & Lin, Jizhen, 2006. "Cluster analysis using multivariate normal mixture models to detect differential gene expression with microarray data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 641-658, November.
    13. Fernanda De Bastiani & Robert A. Rigby & Dimitrios M. Stasinopoulous & Audrey H.M.A. Cysneiros & Miguel A. Uribe-Opazo, 2018. "Gaussian Markov random field spatial models in GAMLSS," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(1), pages 168-186, January.
    14. Cheng, Cheng, 2009. "Internal validation inferences of significant genomic features in genome-wide screening," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 788-800, January.
    15. Sinjini Sikdar & Somnath Datta & Susmita Datta, 2017. "EAMA: Empirically adjusted meta-analysis for large-scale simultaneous hypothesis testing in genomic experiments," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-19, October.
    16. Tianwei Yu, 2018. "A new dynamic correlation algorithm reveals novel functional aspects in single cell and bulk RNA-seq data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-22, August.
    17. Xiang, Qinfang & Edwards, Jode & Gadbury, Gary L., 2006. "Interval estimation in a finite mixture model: Modeling P-values in multiple testing applications," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 570-586, November.
    18. Gordon, Alexander & Chen, Linlin & Glazko, Galina & Yakovlev, Andrei, 2009. "Balancing type one and two errors in multiple testing for differential expression of genes," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(5), pages 1622-1629, March.
    19. Håvard Rue & Ingelin Steinsland & Sveinung Erland, 2004. "Approximating hidden Gaussian Markov random fields," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 66(4), pages 877-892, November.
    20. Martin P. Boer & Hans-Peter Piepho & Emlyn R. Williams, 2020. "Linear Variance, P-splines and Neighbour Differences for Spatial Adjustment in Field Trials: How are they Related?," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 25(4), pages 676-698, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:62:y:2006:i:1:p:10-18:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0006-341X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.