IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ausact/v6y1996i11p3-15.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Broad Scope Accountability the Reporting Priority

Author

Listed:
  • Lee D. Parker

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Lee D. Parker, 1996. "Broad Scope Accountability the Reporting Priority," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 6(11), pages 3-15, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ausact:v:6:y:1996:i:11:p:3-15
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1835-2561.1996.tb00002.x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. G.D. Carnegie & P.W. Wolnizer, 1995. "The Financial Value Of Cultural, Heritage And Scientific Collections: An Accounting Fiction," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 5(9), pages 31-47, June.
    2. Lewis, N. R. & Parker, L. D. & Sutcliffe, P., 1984. "Financial reporting to employees: the pattern of development 1919 to 1979," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 9(3-4), pages 275-289, October.
    3. Williams, Paul F., 1987. "The legitimate concern with fairness," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 169-189, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Garry D. Carnegie & Brian West, 2010. "A Conceptual Analysis of Price Setting in Australian Local Government," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 20(2), pages 110-120, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gray, Rob, 2002. "The social accounting project and Accounting Organizations and Society Privileging engagement, imaginings, new accountings and pragmatism over critique?," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 27(7), pages 687-708, October.
    2. Neu, D. & Warsame, H. & Pedwell, K., 1998. "Managing public impressions: environmental disclosures in annual reports," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 265-282, April.
    3. Mark Christensen, 2007. "What We Might Know (But Aren't Sure) About Public-Sector Accrual Accounting," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 17(41), pages 51-65, March.
    4. Susan Newberry, 2001. "Public-Sector Accounting: A Common Reporting Framework?," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 11(23), pages 2-7, March.
    5. Biondi Yuri, 2011. "The Pure Logic of Accounting: A Critique of the Fair Value Revolution," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 1(1), pages 1-49, January.
    6. Garry Carnegie & Peter Wolnizer, 1999. "Unravelling the Rhetoric About the Financial Reporting of Public Collections as Assets," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 9(17), pages 16-21, March.
    7. Filip Hrůza & Petr Valouch, 2016. "Public Sector Accounting Policy Reform in the Czech Republic: Experience from Local Governments (pilot)," European Financial and Accounting Journal, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2016(4), pages 17-37.
    8. Reiter, Sara Ann & Williams, Paul F., 2002. "The structure and progressivity of accounting research: the crisis in the academy revisited," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 575-607, August.
    9. J. Guthrie & L. Parker & L. M. English, 2003. "A Review of New Public Financial Management Change in Australia," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 13(30), pages 3-9, July.
    10. Allan Barton, 2009. "The Use and Abuse of Accounting in the Public Sector Financial Management Reform Program in Australia," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 45(2), pages 221-248, June.
    11. Natalia Aversano & Ferdinando Di Carlo & Giuseppe Sannino & Paolo Tartaglia Polcini & Rosa Lombardi, 2020. "Corporate social responsibility, stakeholder engagement, and universities: New evidence from the Italian scenario," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1892-1899, July.
    12. Chew Ng & Bob Shead, 1999. "Major Issues Associated With the Reporting of Government Net Worth," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 9(19), pages 61-68, November.
    13. Warren Maroun, 2020. "A Conceptual Model for Understanding Corporate Social Responsibility Assurance Practice," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 161(1), pages 187-209, January.
    14. Garry Carnegie & Brian West, 1997. "Observing the PSASB: ED 50 and the Recognition of Infrastructure Assets," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 7(14), pages 30-39, October.
    15. repec:dau:papers:123456789/6742 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Eve, CHIAPELLO & Annick, BOURGUIGNON, 2003. "The role of Criticism in the Dynamics of Performance Evaluation Systems," HEC Research Papers Series 777, HEC Paris.
    17. Cuguero-Escofet, Natalia & Rosanas, Josep M., 2012. "The just design and use of management control systems as requirements for goal congruence," IESE Research Papers D/949, IESE Business School.
    18. Roger L. Burritt & Michael McCrae & Chandra Benjamin, 1996. "What Is A Public-Sector Asset?," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 6(11), pages 23-28, March.
    19. Garry D. Carnegie & Brian West, 2010. "A Conceptual Analysis of Price Setting in Australian Local Government," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 20(2), pages 110-120, June.
    20. Frank Micallef & Graham Peirson, 1997. "Financial Reporting of Cultural, Heritage, Scientific and Community Collections," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 7(13), pages 31-37, May.
    21. MacDonald, Laura D. & Richardson, Alan J., 2004. "Identity, appropriateness and the construction of regulatory space: the formation of the Public Accountant's Council of Ontario," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 29(5-6), pages 489-524.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ausact:v:6:y:1996:i:11:p:3-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1035-6908 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.