IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ausact/v5y1995i10p64-70.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reaction To The Mandatory Write-Down Provisions Of AASB 1010: Accounting For The Revaluation Of Non-Current Assets

Author

Listed:
  • Julie Cotter
  • Tracy Martin
  • Donald Stokes

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Julie Cotter & Tracy Martin & Donald Stokes, 1995. "Reaction To The Mandatory Write-Down Provisions Of AASB 1010: Accounting For The Revaluation Of Non-Current Assets," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 5(10), pages 64-70, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ausact:v:5:y:1995:i:10:p:64-70
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1835-2561.1995.tb00383.x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Easton, Pd & Eddey, Ph & Harris, Ts, 1993. "An Investigation Of Revaluations Of Tangible Long-Lived Assets," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31, pages 1-38.
    2. Duke, Joanne C. & Hunt, Herbert III, 1990. "An empirical examination of debt covenant restrictions and accounting-related debt proxies," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(1-3), pages 45-63, January.
    3. John Trowell, 1992. "Asset Valuation: Recoverable Amount And Measurement Error," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 1(4), pages 27-33, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Courtenay, Stephen M. & Cahan, Steven F., 2004. "The impact of debt on market reactions to the revaluation of noncurrent assets," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 219-243, April.
    2. Denise A. Jones, 2013. "Changes in the Funded Status of Retirement Plans after the Adoption of SFAS No. 158: Economic Improvement or Balance Sheet Management," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3), pages 1099-1132, September.
    3. Chunghyeok Im & Xiyu Rong & Myung-In Kim & Jin-Cheol Bae, 2025. "Does State-Owned Enterprises’ Performance Evaluation Detect Earnings Manipulation?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-19, April.
    4. Thomas W. Scott, 1991. "Pension disclosures under SFAS No. 87: Theory and evidence," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(1), pages 62-81, September.
    5. Hand, John R. M. & Skantz, Terrance R., 1997. "The economic determinants of accounting choices: The unique case of equity carve-outs under SAB 51," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 175-203, December.
    6. Kim, Young Jun & Choi, Sera & Lee, Eugenia Y. & Lee, Su Jeong, 2023. "Perpetual securities and stock prices: Korean evidence," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(1).
    7. Godwin, Joseph H. & Goldberg, Stephen R. & Douthett, Edward B., 1998. "Relevance of U.S.-GAAP for Japanese companies," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 589-604.
    8. Anderson, Ronald C. & Mansi, Sattar A. & Reeb, David M., 2004. "Board characteristics, accounting report integrity, and the cost of debt," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 315-342, September.
    9. Tony Abrahams & Baljit K. Sidhu, 1998. "The Role of R&D Capitalisations in Firm Valuation and Perfor Mance Measurement," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 23(2), pages 169-183, December.
    10. Cairns, David & Massoudi, Dianne & Taplin, Ross & Tarca, Ann, 2011. "IFRS fair value measurement and accounting policy choice in the United Kingdom and Australia," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 1-21.
    11. Hanlon, Dean & Navissi, Farshid & Soepriyanto, Gatot, 2014. "The value relevance of deferred tax attributed to asset revaluations," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 87-99.
    12. Kusano, Masaki & Sakuma, Yoshihiro & Tsunogaya, Noriyuki, 2016. "Economic consequences of changes in the lease accounting standard: Evidence from Japan," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 73-88.
    13. Fields, Thomas D. & Lys, Thomas Z. & Vincent, Linda, 2001. "Empirical research on accounting choice," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(1-3), pages 255-307, September.
    14. Denise A. Jones, 2014. "When Do Companies Fund Their Defined Benefit Pension Plans?," Accounting & Taxation, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 6(1), pages 13-23.
    15. Baljit K. Sidhu & Greg Whittred, 2003. "The Role of Political Costs in the Deferred Tax Policy Choice," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 28(1), pages 63-82, June.
    16. Adam Bordeman & Peter Demerjian, 2022. "Do Borrowers Intentionally Avoid Covenant Violations? A Reexamination of the Debt Covenant Hypothesis," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 60(5), pages 1741-1774, December.
    17. Brettschneider, Carina, 2019. "R&D Accounting Discretion as an Income Smoothing Tool: An Empirical Analysis of German Listed Companies," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 4(2), pages 151-172.
    18. Olante, Maria Elena & Lassini, Ugo, 2022. "Investment property: Fair value or cost model? Recent evidence from the application of IAS 40 in Europe," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    19. Rosalyn Oei & Alan Ramsay & Paul Mather, 2008. "Earnings persistence, accruals and managerial share ownership," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 48(3), pages 475-502, September.
    20. Bowen, Robert M. & DuCharme, Larry & Shores, D., 1995. "Stakeholders' implicit claims and accounting method choice," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 255-295, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ausact:v:5:y:1995:i:10:p:64-70. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1035-6908 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.