IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ausact/v33y2023i2p188-202.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Barriers to the Usefulness of Non‐profit Financial Statements: Perspectives From Key Internal Stakeholders

Author

Listed:
  • David J. Gilchrist
  • Andrew West
  • Yuyu Zhang

Abstract

The extent to which financial reports are useful is of central importance in relation to the accounting standards that underpin them. This is as true of non‐profit financial reporting as it is of financial reporting in the commercial and public sectors. In this paper we report on our findings related to a research project focused on examining the usefulness of Australian accounting standards from the point of view of non‐profit directors, preparers of non‐profit financial statements and their auditors. Undertaking a series of round tables specific to each cohort, we examine the question of who is responsible, for what and to whom in the context of financial reporting. Our research reinforces a number of issues negatively impacting the usefulness of General Purpose Financial Reports (GPFRs) in the non‐profit sector. We draw particular attention to concerns around the financial literacy of non‐profit directors, potential misunderstandings in relation to financial profitability, and complexity across a range of issues, including revenue recognition. Overall, the project finds that there are manifest specific issues and aspects particular to the sector and that simply adopting the same approach with regard to accounting standards as taken in the for‐profit sector is insufficient to ensure the utility of non‐profit GPFRs. Undertaking round tables for non‐profit directors, preparers of non‐profit financial statements and auditors, we examine the issues negatively impacting the utility of General Purpose Financial Reports in the non‐profit sector. We draw attention to concerns around the financial literacy of non‐profit directors, misunderstandings in relation to financial profitability, and complexity across a range of issues, including revenue recognition.

Suggested Citation

  • David J. Gilchrist & Andrew West & Yuyu Zhang, 2023. "Barriers to the Usefulness of Non‐profit Financial Statements: Perspectives From Key Internal Stakeholders," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 33(2), pages 188-202, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ausact:v:33:y:2023:i:2:p:188-202
    DOI: 10.1111/auar.12401
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12401
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/auar.12401?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elka Johansson & Peter Carey & George Tanewski & Iliyas Yusoff, 2022. "The effect of members on charities’ annual reporting: evidence from companies limited by guarantee in Australia," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(S1), pages 1851-1886, April.
    2. Dominic Cyr & Suzanne Landry & Anne Fortin, 2022. "Management of Charitable Program Expense Ratios in the Charity Sector," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 32(1), pages 106-123, March.
    3. Carolyn Cordery & Gwynn Narraway, 2010. "Valuing Volunteers: Expanding the Relevance and Reliability Debate," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 20(4), pages 334-342, December.
    4. Armstrong, Christopher S. & Guay, Wayne R. & Weber, Joseph P., 2010. "The role of information and financial reporting in corporate governance and debt contracting," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(2-3), pages 179-234, December.
    5. Chris Van Staden & James Heslop, 2009. "Implications of Applying a Private Sector Based Reporting Model to Not-for-Profit Entities: The Treatment of Charitable Distributions by Charities in New Zealand," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 19(1), pages 42-53, March.
    6. David J. Gilchrist & Roger Simnett, 2019. "Research horizons for public and private not‐for‐profit sector reporting: moving the bar in the right direction," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 59(1), pages 59-85, March.
    7. Nives Botica Redmayne & Fawzi Laswad & Dimu Ehalaiye & Warwick Stent, 2022. "Insights on management commentary in financial reports: the views of users, preparers and auditors," Meditari Accountancy Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 31(4), pages 817-840, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manzurul Alam & Zahirul Hoque, 2021. "Boundary management and accounting visibility in social services: a case study," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(4), pages 5377-5401, December.
    2. Eunsoo Kim & Suyon Kim & Jaehong Lee, 2021. "Do Foreign Investors Affect Carbon Emission Disclosure? Evidence from South Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-14, September.
    3. Tatiana Dănescu & Ioan-Ovidiu Spătăcean & Maria-Alexandra Popa & Carmen-Gabriela Sîrbu, 2021. "The Impact of Corporate Governance Mechanism over Financial Performance: Evidence from Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-14, September.
    4. Ghafran, Chaudhry & O'Sullivan, Noel, 2017. "The impact of audit committee expertise on audit quality: Evidence from UK audit fees," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(6), pages 578-593.
    5. Katsuhiko Muramiya & Tomomi Takada, 2015. "Cross-Shareholdings and Information Environment," Discussion Papers in Economics and Business 15-20, Osaka University, Graduate School of Economics.
    6. Joohyung Ha, 2021. "Bank accounting conservatism and bank loan quality," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(3-4), pages 498-532, March.
    7. Freyburg, Tina & Garbe, Lisa & Wavre, Véronique, 2022. "The political power of internet business: A comprehensive dataset of Telecommunications Ownership and Control (TOSCO)," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue Online fi, pages 1-1.
    8. Kausar, Asad & Shroff, Nemit & White, Hal, 2016. "Real effects of the audit choice," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 157-181.
    9. Jing Wu & Qiuge Yao & Haoxiang Tong, 2019. "Does monetary policy tightening reduce the maturity mismatch of investment and financing: Empirical evidence from China," Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 9(6), pages 1-3.
    10. Kim, Incheol & Miller, Steve & Wan, Hong & Wang, Bin, 2016. "Drivers behind the monitoring effectiveness of global institutional investors: Evidence from earnings management," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 24-46.
    11. Hao, Qian & Shi, Xiangyan & Bu, Danlu, 2018. "The Chinese stimulus program from 2008 to 2010 and accounting information quality," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 64-78.
    12. D’Augusta, Carlo & Grossetti, Francesco, 2023. "How did Covid-19 affect investors’ interpretation of earnings news? The role of accounting conservatism," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    13. Chy, Mahfuz & Kyung, Hoyoun, 2023. "The effect of bond market transparency on bank loan contracting," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(2).
    14. Krzysztof Drachal, 2014. "Is There a Feedback Mechanism in Accounting?," European Financial and Accounting Journal, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2014(1), pages 85-95.
    15. Radhakrishnan Gopalan & Sudarshan Jayaraman, 2012. "Private Control Benefits and Earnings Management: Evidence from Insider Controlled Firms," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1), pages 117-157, March.
    16. David J. Gilchrist & Roger Simnett, 2019. "Research horizons for public and private not‐for‐profit sector reporting: moving the bar in the right direction," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 59(1), pages 59-85, March.
    17. Qianbin Feng & Lexin Zhao & Mingxue Xu, 2023. "Tax Incentives and Maturity Mismatch between Investment and Financing: Evidence from China," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 31(4), pages 1-36, July.
    18. Kang, Chang-Mo & Kim, Donghyun, 2022. "Risk management transparency and compensation," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    19. Hans B. Christensen & Luzi Hail & Christian Leuz, 2021. "Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 1176-1248, September.
    20. Igor Goncharov & Martin Jacob, 2014. "Why Do Countries Mandate Accrual Accounting for Tax Purposes?," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(5), pages 1127-1163, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ausact:v:33:y:2023:i:2:p:188-202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1035-6908 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.