IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/asiaps/v12y2025i1ne70009.html

The Elite Paradigm Driving Australian Aid Policy: Learning to Live With the ‘Cautious Consensus’

Author

Listed:
  • Benjamin Day
  • Tamas Wells

Abstract

This article explores the underlying reasons for why the Albanese Labor Governmentʼs stated policy ambition to ‘rebuild Australiaʼs international development program’ has not yet been accomplished and is unlikely to be realised, at least in the near‐to‐medium term. Based on interviews conducted with 21 Australian Members of Parliament, we find that the ‘cautious consensus’—a collection of ideas guiding elite perspectives on Australian aid policy that emerged during the COVID‐19 pandemic—has rapidly consolidated, to the point where it can now be considered a paradigm. We identify three main factors that have led to this consolidation: the declining salience of aid; growing elite scepticism about the usefulness of aid; and a combination of political challenges that are difficult for Labor to navigate, as it seeks to become a long‐term Government. Given the prospects of shifting the unambitious status quo are unlikely in the in the near‐to‐medium term, we examine what ‘living with the cautious consensus’ means for the Australian development sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Benjamin Day & Tamas Wells, 2025. "The Elite Paradigm Driving Australian Aid Policy: Learning to Live With the ‘Cautious Consensus’," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(1), January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:asiaps:v:12:y:2025:i:1:n:e70009
    DOI: 10.1002/app5.70009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/app5.70009
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/app5.70009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephen Brown, 2020. "The Rise and Fall of the Aid Effectiveness Norm," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 32(4), pages 1230-1248, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elena Sondermann & Cornelia Ulbert, 2021. "Transformation through ‘Meaningful’ Partnership? SDG 17 as Metagovernance Norm and Its Global Health Implementation," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(1), pages 152-163.
    2. Sumner, Andrew & Klingebiel, Stephan, 2025. "Development cooperation at a tipping point: How, why and through what mechanisms do policy norms break?," IDOS Discussion Papers 29/2025, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    3. Jan Orbie & Viktor Opsomer & Yentyl Williams & Sarah Delputte & Joren Verschaeve, 2021. "Shielded against risk? European donor co‐ordination in Palestine," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 39(5), pages 703-720, September.
    4. Elena Sondermann & Cornelia Ulbert, 2021. "Transformation through ‘Meaningful’ Partnership? SDG 17 as Metagovernance Norm and Its Global Health Implementation," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(1), pages 152-163.
    5. Lena Gutheil & Dirk‐Jan Koch, 2023. "Civil society organizations and managerialism: On the depoliticization of the adaptive management agenda," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 41(1), January.
    6. Lena Gutheil & Dirk-Jan Koch, 2024. "Aid Unchained: Examining Development Project Management Practices at Aid Chain Interfaces," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 24(2), pages 97-112, April.
    7. Marisa Ramos-Rollón, 2022. "Modalities of Cooperation and Policy Transfer: The Case of the European Programme for Social Cohesion in Latin America—EUROsociAL II," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 34(2), pages 806-827, April.
    8. Stephen Brown, 2024. "When development cooperation principles clash: Country ownership and LGBTQI+ inclusion in hostile environments," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(7), pages 2790-2804, October.
    9. Klingebiel, Stephan, 2023. "Geopolitics, the Global South and development policy," IDOS Policy Briefs 14/2023, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS), Bonn.
    10. Koji Oishi & Hiroto Ito & Yohsuke Murase & Hiroki Takikawa & Takuto Sakamoto, 2022. "Evolution of global development cooperation: An analysis of aid flows with hierarchical stochastic block models," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(8), pages 1-11, August.
    11. Jack Taggart & Han Cheng & Marcus Power, 2025. "Chinese Development Finance and African Policy Space: Towards Productive Incoherence?," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(4), pages 1039-1053, May.
    12. Esser, Daniel E. & Janus, Heiner, 2025. "Everything, everywhere, all at once? Donor bureaucrats struggle with four dimensions of development effectiveness," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    13. Leininger, Julia & Strupat, Christoph & Adeto, Yonas Adaye & Shimeles, Abebe & Wasike, Wilson & Aleksandrova, Mariya & Berger, Axel & Brandi, Clara & Brüntrup, Michael & Burchi, Francesco & Dick, Eva , 2021. "The COVID-19 pandemic and structural transformation in Africa: Evidence for action," IDOS Discussion Papers 11/2021, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:asiaps:v:12:y:2025:i:1:n:e70009. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=2050-2680 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.