IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/acctfi/v65y2025i1p1047-1058.html

Accredited investor tests: How to balance, access, entrepreneurial funding, and investor protection?

Author

Listed:
  • Mark Humphery‐Jenner

Abstract

Regulators seek to balance investor protection with the costs of that protection. This often leads to a distinction between “accredited” and “retail” investors. Only “accredited” investors can invest in certain “risky” or “illiquid” assets, including start‐ups and wholesale funds. But what should be the “bar” to be classified as “accredited”? Should people be able to qualify via income, wealth, or education? Should they be able to self‐certify? Thus, this article considers the situation in the US, UK, and Australia and argues in favour of letting people qualify via wealth, income, and education and being able to self‐certify.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark Humphery‐Jenner, 2025. "Accredited investor tests: How to balance, access, entrepreneurial funding, and investor protection?," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 65(1), pages 1047-1058, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:acctfi:v:65:y:2025:i:1:p:1047-1058
    DOI: 10.1111/acfi.13366
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.13366
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/acfi.13366?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kazem Mochkabadi & Christine K. Volkmann, 2020. "Equity crowdfunding: a systematic review of the literature," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 75-118, January.
    2. Douglas Cumming & Minjie Zhang, 2019. "Angel investors around the world," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 50(5), pages 692-719, July.
    3. Johan, Sofia & Reardon, Robert S., 2024. "The role of platform stakes in equity crowdfunding success," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 69(PA).
    4. Xu, Jiajie, 2023. "Is There a Trade-off Between Protecting Investors and Promoting Entrepreneurial Activity? Evidence from Angel Financing," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 58(8), pages 3305-3341, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Honjo, Yuji & Ikeuchi, Kenta & Nakamura, Hiroki, 2024. "Does risk aversion affect individuals’ interests and actions in angel investing? Empirical evidence from Japan," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    2. Maiolini, Riccardo & Cappa, Francesco & Franco, Stefano & Quaratino, Giovanni Raimondo, 2024. "The impact of sustainable development goals in lending-based prosocial crowdfunding: A topic modeling analysis on the kiva platform," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(PB).
    3. Sami Ben Jabeur & Faten Ben Slimane & Meriem Haouat Asli & Salma Mefteh-Wali, 2025. "Crowdlending platforms: reputation on the line," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-24, December.
    4. Sophie Pommet & Alexandra Rufini & Dominique Torre, 2024. "The role of lead investors in equity crowdfunding campaigns with a secondary market," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 63(1), pages 243-273, June.
    5. Jordan J. McSweeney & Kevin T. McSweeney & Thomas H. Allison & Justin W. Webb, 2025. "Is Prior Failure a Burden for Entrepreneurs’ Follow-Up Crowdfunding Success? An Expectancy Violations Theory Perspective," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 49(5), pages 1431-1469, September.
    6. Yang, Yong & Driffield, Nigel, 2022. "Leveraging the benefits of location decisions into performance: A global view from matched MNEs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 468-483.
    7. Amina Rizwan & Faisal Mustafa, 2022. "Fintech Attaining Sustainable Development: An Investor Perspective of Crowdfunding Platforms in a Developing Country," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-17, June.
    8. Mataigne, Virginie & Meoli, Michele & Vanacker, Tom & Vismara, Silvio, 2025. "False signaling by platform team members and post-campaign venture outcomes: Evidence from an equity crowdfunding platform," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 40(1).
    9. Javier Manso Laso & Ismael Moya-Clemente & Gabriela Ribes Giner, 2025. "Accessing Alternative Finance in Europe: The Role of SMEs, Innovation, and Digital Platforms," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-26, September.
    10. Francesca Pietro, 2021. "The rationale for listing on equity crowdfunding: actual and expected benefits for companies," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 48(4), pages 527-549, December.
    11. Aristogenis Lazos & Rotem Shneor, 2026. "Is having immigrants in entrepreneurial teams good for equity crowdfunding success and long-term venture survival?," Post-Print hal-05563834, HAL.
    12. Berger, Marius & Hottenrott, Hanna, 2021. "Start-up subsidies and the sources of venture capital," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 16(C).
    13. Sven Siebeneicher & Ilker Yenice & Carolin Bock, 2022. "Financial-Return Crowdfunding for Energy and Sustainability in the German-Speaking Realm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-23, September.
    14. Daniel Berliner & Rotem Shneor & Andreas Wald, 2025. "Beyond one-size-fits-all: Empirical evidence on the heterogeneity of equity crowdfunding investors’ decision drivers," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 35(1), pages 1-25, December.
    15. Harrison, Richard T. & Bock, Adam J. & Gregson, Geoff, 2020. "Stairway to heaven? rethinking angel investment policy and practice," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 14(C).
    16. Abderahman Rejeb & Karim Rejeb & Andrea Appolloni & Horst Treiblmaier & Mohammad Iranmanesh, 2025. "Uncovering the themes and trends in crowdfunding research using Latent Dirichlet Allocation," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 75(3), pages 2033-2066, September.
    17. Waddingham, Jacob A. & Chandler, Jeffrey A. & Alexander, Katherine C. & Zafar, Sana & Anglin, Aaron, 2025. "The leisure paradox for entrepreneurs: A neo-institutional theory perspective of disclosing leisure activities in crowdfunding pitches," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 40(2).
    18. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:4:p:632-644 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Abraham Yosipof & Netanel Drori & Or Elroy & Yannis Pierraki, 2024. "Textual sentiment analysis and description characteristics in crowdfunding success: The case of cybersecurity and IoT industries," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 34(1), pages 1-14, December.
    20. Simon Kleinert & Kazem Mochkabadi, 2022. "Gender stereotypes in equity crowdfunding: the effect of gender bias on the interpretation of quality signals," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 47(6), pages 1640-1661, December.
    21. Gvetadze, Salome & Pal, Kristian & Torfs, Wouter, 2020. "The business angel portfolio under the European Angels Fund: An empirical analysis," EIF Working Paper Series 2020/62, European Investment Fund (EIF).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:acctfi:v:65:y:2025:i:1:p:1047-1058. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaanzea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.