IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/acctfi/v55y2015i3p881-910.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does control-ownership divergence impair market liquidity in an emerging market? Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaojun Chu
  • Qigui Liu
  • Gary Gang Tian
  • Steven Cahan

Abstract

type="main" xml:id="acfi12073-abs-0001"> This paper examines how institutional characteristics of emerging economies influence the effect of control-ownership divergence on market liquidity. We find that the divergence is negatively associated with liquidity and that this negative relationship is more pronounced in firms with more severe agency problems and information asymmetry. We argue that in an emerging market, the negative effect of the divergence on liquidity is worsened by state ownership and poorer shareholder protection, both of which result in more severe agency conflicts; we also find, however, that this effect is alleviated by the NTS reform, which aligns the interest of different shareholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaojun Chu & Qigui Liu & Gary Gang Tian & Steven Cahan, 2015. "Does control-ownership divergence impair market liquidity in an emerging market? Evidence from China," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 55(3), pages 881-910, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:acctfi:v:55:y:2015:i:3:p:881-910
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/acfi.2015.55.issue-3
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ma, Rui & Anderson, Hamish D. & Marshall, Ben R., 2018. "Stock market liquidity and trading activity: Is China different?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 32-51.
    2. Ali, Searat & Liu, Benjamin & Su, Jen Je, 2017. "Corporate governance and stock liquidity dimensions: Panel evidence from pure order-driven Australian market," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 275-304.
    3. Linnenluecke, Martina K. & Chen, Xiaoyan & Ling, Xin & Smith, Tom & Zhu, Yushu, 2016. "Emerging trends in Asia-Pacific finance research: A review of recent influential publications and a research agenda," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 66-76.
    4. Dionigi Gerace & Qigui Liu & Gary Gang Tian & Willa Zheng, 2015. "Call Auction Transparency and Market Liquidity: Evidence from China," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 15(2), pages 223-255, June.
    5. Zou, Liping & Tang, Tiantian & Li, Xiaoming, 2016. "The stock preferences of domestic versus foreign investors: Evidence from Qualified Foreign Institutional Investors (QFIIs) in China," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 37, pages 12-28.
    6. Pan, Beier, 2023. "The asymmetric dynamics of stock–bond liquidity correlation in China: The role of macro-financial determinants," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    7. Caixe, Daniel Ferreira & Kalatzis, Aquiles Elie Guimarães & Castro, Luiz Ricardo Kabbach de, 2019. "Controlling shareholders and investment-risk sensitivity in an emerging economy," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 133-153.
    8. Mu-Shun Wang, 2022. "Shareholder Disputes and Commonality in Liquidity: Evidence from the Equity Markets in China," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 29(2), pages 291-325, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:acctfi:v:55:y:2015:i:3:p:881-910. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaanzea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.