IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bjz/ajisjr/2007.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Client Size and Financial Performance on Audit Opinion: Evidence from a Developing Market

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmed A. Diab
  • Samir I. Abdelazim
  • Aref M. Eissa
  • Eid Mahmoud Abozaid
  • Mona Mohamed Elshaabany

Abstract

This research investigates the effect of audit client size and its financial performance on audit opinion in the Egyptian audit market. A few studies have investigated the association between these factors in the audit context, especially in African developing countries. Data are manually collected from the annual financial reports of firms registered in the Egyptian Stock Market, focusing on a sample of EGX 70 from 2012 to 2016, and binary logistic regression is used in data analysis. We found that the company size is insignificantly, positively, related to a qualified, rather than an unqualified, type of audit opinion. In contrast, the client's financial performance has a significant but negative relationship with the qualified type of audit opinion. This study provides insights for managers and investors in developing countries to understand and perceive audit opinions in these contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmed A. Diab & Samir I. Abdelazim & Aref M. Eissa & Eid Mahmoud Abozaid & Mona Mohamed Elshaabany, 2021. "The Impact of Client Size and Financial Performance on Audit Opinion: Evidence from a Developing Market," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 10, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bjz:ajisjr:2007
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2021-0020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.richtmann.org/journal/index.php/ajis/article/view/12374
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.richtmann.org/journal/index.php/ajis/article/view/12374/11969
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2021-0020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maria Tsipouridou & Charalambos Spathis, 2014. "Audit opinion and earnings management: Evidence from Greece," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(1), pages 38-54, March.
    2. Ahsan Habib, 2013. "A meta‐analysis of the determinants of modified audit opinion decisions," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 28(3), pages 184-216, March.
    3. Hongkang Xu & Mai Dao & Jia Wu, 2018. "The effect of real activities manipulation on going concern audit opinions for financially distressed companies," Review of Accounting and Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 17(4), pages 514-539, October.
    4. Chee†Yeow Lim & Hun†Tong Tan, 2010. "Does Auditor Tenure Improve Audit Quality? Moderating Effects of Industry Specialization and Fee Dependence," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3), pages 923-957, September.
    5. Connie L. Becker & Mark L. Defond & James Jiambalvo & K.R. Subramanyam, 1998. "The Effect of Audit Quality on Earnings Management," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(1), pages 1-24, March.
    6. DeFond, Mark L. & Lennox, Clive S., 2011. "The effect of SOX on small auditor exits and audit quality," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 21-40, June.
    7. Jennifer R. Joe, 2003. "Why Press Coverage of a Client Influences the Audit Opinion," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(1), pages 109-133, March.
    8. Mutchler, JF & Hopwood, W & McKeown, JM, 1997. "The influence of contrary information and mitigating factors on audit opinion decisions on bankrupt companies," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(2), pages 295-310.
    9. Hichem Khlif & Khaled Samaha, 2016. "Audit committee activity and internal control quality in Egypt," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 31(3), pages 269-289, March.
    10. Joseph P. H. Fan & T. J. Wong, 2005. "Do External Auditors Perform a Corporate Governance Role in Emerging Markets? Evidence from East Asia," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(1), pages 35-72, March.
    11. Jennifer C. Ireland, 2003. "An Empirical Investigation of Determinants of Audit Reports in the UK," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30, pages 975-1016.
    12. repec:icf:icfjar:v:08:y:2009:i:3-4:p:78-107 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Ahsan Habib, 2013. "A meta-analysis of the determinants of modified audit opinion decisions," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 28(3), pages 184-216, March.
    14. Emiliano Ruiz-Barbadillo & Nieves Gomez-Aguilar & Cristina De Fuentes-Barbera & Maria Antonia Garcia-Benau, 2004. "Audit quality and the going-concern decision-making process: Spanish evidence," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 597-620.
    15. repec:eme:maj000:02686901311304349 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Craswell, Allen & Stokes, Donald J. & Laughton, Janet, 2002. "Auditor independence and fee dependence," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 253-275, June.
    17. Allen D. Blay, 2005. "Independence Threats, Litigation Risk, and the Auditor's Decision Process," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(4), pages 759-789, December.
    18. Prity Kumari & Jamini Kanta Pattanayak, 2017. "Linking earnings management practices and corporate governance system with the firms’ financial performance," Journal of Financial Crime, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 24(2), pages 223-241, May.
    19. Shireenjit Johl & Christine A. Jubb & Keith A. Houghton, 2007. "Earnings management and the audit opinion: evidence from Malaysia," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 22(7), pages 688-715, July.
    20. Rusmin Rusmin & John Evans, 2017. "Audit quality and audit report lag: case of Indonesian listed companies," Asian Review of Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 25(2), pages 191-210, May.
    21. Lopez, Thomas J. & Vandervelde, Scott D. & Wu, Yi-Jing, 2009. "Investor perceptions of an auditor's adverse internal control opinion," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 231-250, May.
    22. Jennifer C. Ireland, 2003. "An Empirical Investigation of Determinants of Audit Reports in the UK," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7‐8), pages 975-1016, September.
    23. Atwood, T.J. & Drake, Michael S. & Myers, James N. & Myers, Linda A., 2011. "Do earnings reported under IFRS tell us more about future earnings and cash flows?," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 103-121, March.
    24. Mercedes Mareque & Elena Rivo-López & Mónica Villanueva-Villar & Santiago Lago-Peñas, 2019. "Audit Opinions: Are They Really Different for Family Businesses?," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(2), pages 21582440198, June.
    25. Ohlson, Ja, 1980. "Financial Ratios And The Probabilistic Prediction Of Bankruptcy," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(1), pages 109-131.
    26. Hongkang Xu & Mai Dao & Jia Wu, 2018. "The effect of real activities manipulation on going concern audit opinions for financially distressed companies," Review of Accounting and Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 17(4), pages 514-539, October.
    27. Thanyaluk Vichitsarawong & Sompong Pornupatham, 2015. "Do audit opinions reflect earnings persistence?," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 30(3), pages 244-276, March.
    28. DeAngelo, Linda Elizabeth, 1981. "Auditor size and audit quality," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(3), pages 183-199, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dusica STEVCEVSKA SRBINOSKA, 2022. "Audit modifications in emerging markets: The Macedonian Stock Exchange," Romanian Journal of Economics, Institute of National Economy, vol. 55(2(64)), pages 43-69, December.
    2. Maria Tsipouridou & Charalambos Spathis, 2014. "Audit opinion and earnings management: Evidence from Greece," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(1), pages 38-54, March.
    3. Santiago Lago-Peñas & Mercedes Mareque Álvarez-Santullano & Elena Rivo-López & Mónica Villanueva-Villar, 2017. "Determining factors for audit opinion in private family and non-family firms. Evidence from Spain," Working Papers. Collection C: Family business 1701, Universidade de Vigo, GEN - Governance and Economics research Network.
    4. Liangcheng Wang & Siying Li & Bikun Zhang & Yifan Zhang & Tao Peng, 2024. "The effect of auditor experience on stock price crash risk," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 64(1), pages 411-444, March.
    5. Geiger, Marshall A. & Basioudis, Ilias G. & DeLange, Paul, 2022. "The effect of non-audit fees and industry specialization on the prevalence and accuracy of auditor’s going-concern reporting decisions," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    6. González-Díaz, Belén & García-Fernández, Roberto & López-Díaz, Antonio, 2015. "Auditor tenure and audit quality in Spanish state-owned foundations," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 115-126.
    7. Nora Muñoz-Izquierdo & María-del-Mar Camacho-Miñano & María-Jesús Segovia-Vargas & David Pascual-Ezama, 2019. "Is the External Audit Report Useful for Bankruptcy Prediction? Evidence Using Artificial Intelligence," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-23, April.
    8. Agustín J. Sánchez-Medina & Félix Blázquez-Santana & Jesús B. Alonso, 2019. "Do Auditors Reflect the True Image of the Company Contrary to the Clients’ Interests? An Artificial Intelligence Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(2), pages 529-545, March.
    9. Li-Jen He, 2021. "Does Industry Specialist Auditor Provide More Insights in Their audit report? An Empirical Study of Key Audit Matters Section," Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 11(5), pages 1-4.
    10. DeFond, Mark & Zhang, Jieying, 2014. "A review of archival auditing research," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 275-326.
    11. Ammar Abid & Muhammad Shaique & Muhammad Anwar ul Haq, 2018. "Do Big Four Auditors Always Provide Higher Audit Quality? Evidence from Pakistan," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-22, June.
    12. Wu, Chloe Yu-Hsuan & Hsu, Hwa-Hsien & Haslam, Jim, 2016. "Audit committees, non-audit services, and auditor reporting decisions prior to failure," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 240-256.
    13. Astrid Rudyanto, 2017. "Audit Firm Reputation versus Auditor Capability: Their Effect on Audit Quality in Indonesia," GATR Journals afr147, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    14. Knechel, W. Robert & Thomas, Edward & Driskill, Matthew, 2020. "Understanding financial auditing from a service perspective," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    15. Sanoran, Kanyarat (Lek), 2018. "Auditors’ going concern reporting accuracy during and after the global financial crisis," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(2), pages 164-178.
    16. Donghui Wu & Qing Ye, 2020. "Public Attention and Auditor Behavior: The Case of Hurun Rich List in China," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 58(3), pages 777-825, June.
    17. Desai, Vikram & Bucaro, Anthony C. & Kim, Joung W. & Srivastava, Rajendra & Desai, Renu, 2023. "Toward a better expert system for auditor going concern opinions using Bayesian network inflation factors," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    18. Michael Doumpos & Chrysovalantis Gaganis & Fotios Pasiouras, 2005. "Explaining qualifications in audit reports using a support vector machine methodology," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(4), pages 197-215, December.
    19. Yi-Hsing Liao & Pih-Shuw Chen & Teng-Sheng Sang & Chia-Hsuan Tseng, 2020. "Does Client Importance Matter to Book-Tax Differences?," Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 10(5), pages 1-17.
    20. Jere R. Francis & Jagan Krishnan, 1999. "Accounting Accruals and Auditor Reporting Conservatism," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(1), pages 135-165, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjz:ajisjr:2007. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Richtmann Publishing Ltd (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.richtmann.org/journal/index.php/ajis .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.