IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bjz/ajisjr/1802.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Regulation of Equity Crowdfunding in United Kingdom and Malaysia: A Comparative Study

Author

Listed:
  • Wan Amir Azlan Wan Haniff
  • Asma Hakimah Ab Halim
  • Rahmah Ismail

Abstract

Equity Crowdfunding is a novel method for small and medium enterprises to raise fund from the public through an Internet platform operated by a third-party intermediary or platform operator. As an advanced equity Crowdfunding market in the world, United Kingdom regulation on equity crowdfunding is frequently used as a significant ingredient in its development, so it functions as a model for other legislations. Despite there is positive sign of equity crowdfunding market in Malaysia in terms of funds raised by platform operator, still the performance is pale in comparison with the achievement done by United Kingdom. This article analyses the approaches to ECF adopted in United Kingdom and Malaysia in light of the potential for cross?jurisdictional use of the framework. This qualitative research utilizes the secondary data gained from scientific database analysis and library research including documents and precedents on equity crowdfunding and analysed this data by legal interpretation and comparative assessment. The study finds key features of each jurisdiction as well as notable similarities and differences in terms of the obligations of platform operator, issuer and investor. This article recommends for issuer in Malaysia which requires small amount of funds to be exempted on the disclosure requirements and to provide tax incentive for retail investors in order to encourage public to utilize equity crowdfunding.

Suggested Citation

  • Wan Amir Azlan Wan Haniff & Asma Hakimah Ab Halim & Rahmah Ismail, 2019. "The Regulation of Equity Crowdfunding in United Kingdom and Malaysia: A Comparative Study," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 8, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bjz:ajisjr:1802
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.richtmann.org/journal/index.php/ajis/article/view/10561
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.richtmann.org/journal/index.php/ajis/article/view/10561/10186
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vulkan, Nir & Åstebro, Thomas & Sierra, Manuel Fernandez, 2016. "Equity crowdfunding: A new phenomena," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 5(C), pages 37-49.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thomas Hellmann & Ilona Mostipan & Nir Vulkan, 2019. "Be Careful What You Ask For: Fundraising Strategies in Equity Crowdfunding," NBER Working Papers 26275, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Anton Miglo, 2020. "Crowdfunding in a Competitive Environment," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-38, February.
    3. Mónika Kuti & Zsolt Bedõ & Dorottya Geiszl, 2017. "Equity-based Crowdfunding," Financial and Economic Review, Magyar Nemzeti Bank (Central Bank of Hungary), vol. 16(4), pages 187-200.
    4. Iskra Panteleeva & Anatoliy Asenov, 2020. "The Entrepreneurship and Innovation Context in an Integrated Model for the Development of Economies and Enterprises," Economic Archive, D. A. Tsenov Academy of Economics, Svishtov, Bulgaria, issue 4 Year 20, pages 35-51.
    5. Malek Hamouda & Imen Mejri & Donia Trabelsi, 2017. "Crowdequity et Crowdlending : deux alternatives de financement des TPE/PME. Le cas de l'entreprise Gifts for change," Post-Print hal-02373759, HAL.
    6. Lars Hornuf & Matthias Schmitt, 2016. "Success and Failure in Equity Crowdfunding," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 14(2), pages 16-22, 07.
    7. Coakley, Jerry & Cumming, Douglas J. & Lazos, Aristogenis & Vismara, Silvio, 2021. "Enfranchising the crowd: Nominee account equity crowdfunding," CFS Working Paper Series 664, Center for Financial Studies (CFS).
    8. Sven Siebeneicher & Ilker Yenice & Carolin Bock, 2022. "Financial-Return Crowdfunding for Energy and Sustainability in the German-Speaking Realm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-23, September.
    9. Joern H. Block & Christian O. Fisch & Mirjam van Praag, 2017. "The Schumpeterian entrepreneur: a review of the empirical evidence on the antecedents, behaviour and consequences of innovative entrepreneurship," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 61-95, January.
    10. Coakley, Jerry & Lazos, Aristogenis & Liñares-Zegarra, José M., 2022. "Seasoned equity crowdfunded offerings," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    11. Stevenson, Regan M. & Ciuchta, Michael P. & Letwin, Chaim & Dinger, Jenni M. & Vancouver, Jeffrey B., 2019. "Out of control or right on the money? Funder self-efficacy and crowd bias in equity crowdfunding," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 348-367.
    12. Simon Kleinert & Kazem Mochkabadi, 2022. "Gender stereotypes in equity crowdfunding: the effect of gender bias on the interpretation of quality signals," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 47(6), pages 1640-1661, December.
    13. Bento, Nuno & Gianfrate, Gianfranco & Groppo, Sara Virginia, 2019. "Do crowdfunding returns reward risk? Evidences from clean-tech projects," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 107-116.
    14. Marco Bade & Martin Walther, 2021. "Local preferences and the allocation of attention in equity-based crowdfunding," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(8), pages 2501-2533, November.
    15. Kovacs, Attila, 2018. "Gender Differences in Equity Crowdfunding," OSF Preprints 5pcmb, Center for Open Science.
    16. Junjuan Du, 2023. "Rational or Impulsive? Early Backers’ Investment Behavior in Agri-Food Crowdfunding from 4P–4C Perspectives," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, August.
    17. Zaggl, Michael A. & Block, Joern, 2019. "Do small funding amounts lead to reverse herding? A field experiment in reward-based crowdfunding," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 12(C).
    18. Evila Piva & Cristina Rossi-Lamastra, 2018. "Human capital signals and entrepreneurs’ success in equity crowdfunding," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 667-686, October.
    19. Lars Hornuf & Matthias Schmitt & Eliza Stenzhorn, 2017. "Equity Crowdfunding in Germany and the UK: Follow-up Funding and Firm Failure," CESifo Working Paper Series 6642, CESifo.
    20. Astebro, Thomas B. & Lovo, Stefano & Fernandez Sierra, Manuel & Vulkan, Nir, 2017. "Herding in Equity Crowdfunding," HEC Research Papers Series 1245, HEC Paris, revised 04 Jun 2018.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjz:ajisjr:1802. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Richtmann Publishing Ltd (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.richtmann.org/journal/index.php/ajis .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.