IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdu/oijscm/v2y2017i1p57-79id359.html

Procurement Process Approvals And Their Contribution To High Quality Market Driven Products: A Case Of The United Nations Organization Stabilization Mission In The Democratic Republic Of Congo (Monusco) Entebbe Support Base

Author

Listed:
  • Gatta Ouyabaka Marius

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify how process approvals contribute to high quality market driven products.Methodology: The study employed a descriptive case study design. The target population comprised of 261 employees of MONUSCO Entebbe Support Base holding international, United Nations Volunteers (UNV) and National contracts. Random and purposive sampling techniques were specifically used to select samples for this study. Data was collected using questionnaires and interview guides. The quantitative data was further analysed using SPSS for descriptive and inferential statistics while the qualitative data was analysed using content analysis.Findings: The study findings showed that sourcing activity has been used to identify and select the most qualified bidder with quality products and services needed in MONUSCO ESB since it facilitates adequate gathering and collection of all relevant information on the bidder. The findings further showed that market capability analysis is effectively carried out to determine where to procure the type and quality of products, materials, goods and services needed at the base. It was also found that delivery schedules that fit in MONUSCO requirements are drawn with the suppliers and this has improved on the delivery schedules met by the individual suppliers for all kinds of materials, goods and services required by the MONUSCO users' departments. Staff were found to be aware of vendors' evaluation process in their respective sections which improved on the supplier sourcing and selection process for a fair and unbiased evaluation of the bidders in the base. It was further found that the quality of materials depended on their technical specifications as approved at MONUSCO and not on their price which led to client satisfaction amongst the user departments in the base. In addition, evaluation of vendors starts during the delivery of goods/services and works in the base and this has strengthened the achievement of value for money through specifications, quantity and quality standards agreed on at the time of contract award at the base. Unique contribution to theory, practice and policy: The study recommends that MONUSCO procurement section to adequately select the right suppliers to provide the required goods and services. The organization should establish agreements with suppliers with clear guidelines on operations during service delivery. The study further recommends that members of the MONUSCO contracts committee should be recruited and allocated duties basing on the competencies as well as experience in procurement activities within the UN environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Gatta Ouyabaka Marius, 2017. "Procurement Process Approvals And Their Contribution To High Quality Market Driven Products: A Case Of The United Nations Organization Stabilization Mission In The Democratic Republic Of Congo (Monusco) Entebbe Support Base," International Journal of Supply Chain Management, IPRJB, vol. 2(1), pages 57-79.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdu:oijscm:v:2:y:2017:i:1:p:57-79:id:359
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iprjb.org/journals/IJSCM/article/view/359
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rainer Kattel & Veiko Lember, 2010. "Public procurement as an industrial policy tool: An option for developing countries?," Journal of Public Procurement, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 10(3), pages 368-404, March.
    2. Benon C. Basheka, 2008. "Procurement planning and accountability of local government procurement systems in developing countries: evidence from uganda," Journal of Public Procurement, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 8(3), pages 379-406, March.
    3. Rainer Kattel & Veiko Lember, 2010. "Public procurement as an industrial policy tool an option for developing countries?," The Other Canon Foundation and Tallinn University of Technology Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics 31, TUT Ragnar Nurkse Department of Innovation and Governance.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Juhász, Péter & Tátrai, Tünde, 2024. "A közbeszerzés piaci fejlettségének és hatékonyságának megítélése Magyarországon [Assessing the development and efficiency of public procurement in Hungary]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(4), pages 444-463.
    2. Marly Tatiana Celis Galvez & Vitezslav Titl & Fredo Schotanus, 2025. "Discretion and political favoritism: Evidence from two reforms in public procurement," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 91(3), pages 915-968, January.
    3. Mehmet Akif Demircioglu & Roberto Vivona, 2021. "Positioning public procurement as a procedural tool for innovation: an empirical study [Creating the Conditions for Radical Public Service Innovation]," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 40(3), pages 379-396.
    4. Liu, Xiaofeng & Miao, Haoran & Zhou, Wenxiang & Qiu, Yumin, 2024. "The impact of government procurement on green technological innovation: Evidence from manufacturing sector in china," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    5. Tania Ghossein & Bernard Hoekman & Anirudh Shingal, 2021. "Public Procurement, Regional Integration, and the Belt and Road Initiative [How China Got Sri Lanka to Cough Up a Port]," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 36(2), pages 131-163.
    6. Anna Fedyunina & Liudmila Ruzhanskaya & Yuri Simachev, 2025. "Global Imperative, Local Realities: Unveiling Drivers of Industrial Robotization in Russian Manufacturing," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(3), pages 11063-11095, September.
    7. Ari Van Assche & Ali Arsalan Pasha & Lucian Cernat & Hinrich Voss, 2024. "From the editor – Governments as buyers: the international business implications of public procurement," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(2), pages 133-146, June.
    8. Bernard Hoekman & Marco Sanfilippo & Filippo Santi, 2022. "Government Demand and Domestic Firms Growth: Evidence from Uganda," RSCAS Working Papers 2022/54, European University Institute.
    9. T. Gries & R. Grundmann & I. Palnau & M. Redlin, 2017. "Innovations, growth and participation in advanced economies - a review of major concepts and findings," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 293-351, April.
    10. Karo , Erkki & Kattel , Rainer, 2015. "Innovation Bureaucracy: Does the organization of government matter when promoting innovation?," Papers in Innovation Studies 2015/38, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    11. Asuamah Yeboah, Samuel & Kumi, Ernest & Owusu, Ernest, 2025. "Governance Mechanisms and Procurement Outcomes in Higher Education: An Evidence-Based Synthesis," MPRA Paper 124630, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 19 Apr 2025.
    12. Waldemiro Francisco Sorte Jr., 2016. "State intervention for industrial growth: a comparison between Brazil and Japan," International Journal of Public Policy, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(1/2), pages 1-27.
    13. Bernard Hoekman & Marco Sanfilippo, 2018. "Firm performance and participation in public procurement: Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa," RSCAS Working Papers 2018/16, European University Institute.
    14. Zhanguang Chen & Qiaowan Wang & Chao Dou & Tian Liang, 2020. "Government Background Customers and Private Enterprise Innovation from the Perspective of Supply Chain Risk Transmission," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-22, April.
    15. Serenella Caravella & Francesco Crespi, 2021. "The role of public procurement as innovation lever: evidence from Italian manufacturing firms," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(7), pages 663-684, October.
    16. repec:bcp:journl:v:5:y:2021:i:08:p:775-782 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Cornelia Storz & Tobias ten Brink & Na Zou, 2022. "Innovation in emerging economies: How do university-industry linkages and public procurement matter for small businesses?," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 39(4), pages 1439-1480, December.
    18. Serenella Caravella & Francesco Crespi & Dario Guarascio & Matteo Tubiana, 2020. "Competitive strategies, heterogeneous demand sources and firms' growth trajectories," LEM Papers Series 2020/01, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    19. Bernard Hoekman, 2015. "International Cooperation on Public Procurement Regulation," RSCAS Working Papers 2015/88, European University Institute.
    20. Charles Omondi Oliech & Dr. Patrick Mwangangi, 2019. "Effect Of Strategic Procurement Management On Performance Of Level Five Hospitals In Kenya," International Journal of Supply Chain Management, IPRJB, vol. 4(1), pages 39-62.
    21. Mwesiumo, Deodat & Glavee-Geo, Richard & Olsen, Kjetil Magnus & Svenning, Geir Arne, 2021. "Improving public purchaser attitudes towards public procurement of innovations," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdu:oijscm:v:2:y:2017:i:1:p:57-79:id:359. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iprjb.org/journals/IJSCM/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.