IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bco/mbraaa/v5y2018p190-205.html

Investigating the Situation of Lacquered Wire Kavir Yazd Company in Lifecycle and the Fit between Marketing Strategy and Marketing Mix

Author

Listed:
  • Aliakbar Beygiyazdi

    (Department of Management, Yazd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Yazd, Iran)

  • Shahnaz Nayebzadeh

    (Department of Management, Yazd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Yazd, Iran)

  • Abolfazl Davoodi Roknabadi

    (Department of Design and Clothing, Yazd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Yazd, Iran)

Abstract

A strategy is the basic pattern of current and planned objectives, operation and allocation of resources, an organizations interactions with the markets, competitors, and other environmental factors. The main focus of marketing strategy is to allocate and coordinate with marketing activities and resources, and to provide operational objectives in terms of a market - specific product. The strategy can determine success in the world of today mega competitive in the life cycle of the organization if properly allocate organizations resources and marketing mix also fit in with this strategy. The aim of this study was to examine the life cycle of Kavir Lacquered Wire of Yazd Company and its status in the companys life cycle and to review the fit between companys marketing strategy and marketing. The judgmental method sampling among managers and experts was applied and the descriptive research which employed questionnaire and survey methods was used to collect the data. Descriptive statistics showed that this company is in the growth stage of its life cycle and the companys strategic reference points shows that the attack or siege were the main reason of choosing marketing strategy. Data analysis techniques using fuzzy AHP also revealed that the company marketing mix and marketing strategy had only the promotion fit. According to the wire Kavir Yazd Company approach in the context of intelligence capabilities and scientific management; investigating the companys position in the life cycle and also companys strategy and marketing mix will eventually improve manager insight in marketing management.

Suggested Citation

  • Aliakbar Beygiyazdi & Shahnaz Nayebzadeh & Abolfazl Davoodi Roknabadi, 2018. "Investigating the Situation of Lacquered Wire Kavir Yazd Company in Lifecycle and the Fit between Marketing Strategy and Marketing Mix," Marketing and Branding Research, EUROKD, vol. 5(3), pages 190-205.
    • Handle: RePEc:bco:mbraaa::v:5:y:2018:p:190-205
    DOI: 10.33844/mbr.2018.60354
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://api.eurokd.com/Uploads/Article/856/mbr.2018.60354.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.33844/mbr.2018.60354?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anthony, Joseph H. & Ramesh, K., 1992. "Association between accounting performance measures and stock prices : A test of the life cycle hypothesis," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(2-3), pages 203-227, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mehdi Nezami & Kapil R. Tuli & Shantanu Dutta, 2022. "Shareholder wealth implications of software firms’ transition to cloud computing: a marketing perspective," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(3), pages 538-562, May.
    2. Daniel Cohen & Raj Mashruwala & Tzachi Zach, 2010. "The use of advertising activities to meet earnings benchmarks: evidence from monthly data," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 808-832, December.
    3. Pavol Durana & Lucia Michalkova & Andrej Privara & Josef Marousek & Milos Tumpach, 2021. "Does the life cycle affect earnings management and bankruptcy?," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 12(2), pages 425-461, June.
    4. Garcia-Blandon, Josep & Argiles-Bosch, Josep Maria & Castillo-Merino, David & Martinez-Blasco, Monica, 2017. "An Assessment of the Provisions of Regulation (EU) No 537/2014 on Non-audit Services and Audit Firm Tenure: Evidence from Spain," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 251-261.
    5. Chin, Tachia & Li, Zhisheng & Huang, Leping & Li, Xinyu, 2025. "How artificial intelligence promotes new quality productive forces of firms: A dynamic capability view," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    6. Sung Ook Park & Seung Uk Choi & Seong Tae Kim & Hyung Jong Na, 2021. "The Relationship between Corporate Culture and Value at Different Life Cycle Stages," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    7. Stefan Lewandowski, 2017. "Corporate Carbon and Financial Performance: The Role of Emission Reductions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(8), pages 1196-1211, December.
    8. Kravet, Todd D., 2014. "Accounting conservatism and managerial risk-taking: Corporate acquisitions," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 57(2), pages 218-240.
    9. Hwang, Seokyoun & Sarath, Bharat & Han, Seung-youb, 2022. "Auditor independence: The effect of auditors’ quality control efforts and corporate governance," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    10. Minhas Akbar & Ahsan Akbar & Petra Maresova & Minghui Yang & Hafiz Muhammad Arshad, 2020. "Unraveling the Bankruptcy Risk‒Return Paradox across the Corporate Life Cycle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-19, April.
    11. Fawad Rauf & Wanqiu Wang & Cosmina L. Voinea, 2024. "Interaction of Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting at the Crossroads of Green Innovation Performance and Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of the Enterprise Life Stage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-18, February.
    12. Bangpei Wang & Zihao Wu & Yufang Wang, 2024. "The Impact of Low-Carbon City Governance on Firm Green Innovation: An Enterprise Life Cycle Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-18, November.
    13. Viktor V. Ivanov & Nadezhda A. Lvova & Natalia V. Pokrovskaia & Svetlana V. Naumenkova, 2018. "Determinants of tax incentives for investment activity of enterprises," Journal of Tax Reform, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 4(2), pages 125-141.
    14. Abu Amin & Blake Bowler & Mostafa Monzur Hasan & Gerald L. Lobo & Jiri Tresl, 2020. "Firm Life Cycle and Cost of Debt," CERGE-EI Working Papers wp665, The Center for Economic Research and Graduate Education - Economics Institute, Prague.
    15. Li, Yu & Zhong, Huiyi & Tong, Qiye, 2024. "Artificial intelligence, dynamic capabilities, and corporate financial asset allocation," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(PB).
    16. Lisa Silge & Arnt Wöhrmann, 2021. "Market reaction to asymmetric cost behavior: the impact of long-term growth expectations," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 309-347, February.
    17. Sang-Lyul Ryu & Jayoun Won, 2022. "The Value Relevance of Operational Innovation: Insights from the Perspective of Firm Life Cycle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, February.
    18. Hamed Omrani & Saber Samadi & Ahmad Kazemi Margavi & Hamid Asadzadeh & Hemad Nazari, 2011. "Corporate Life Cycle and the Explanatory Power of Risk Measures versus Performance Measures," Journal of Education and Vocational Research, AMH International, vol. 2(6), pages 199-206.
    19. Miles Gietzmann & Ivana Raonic, 2014. "Thinly Traded Growth Stocks: A Joint Examination of Transparency in Communication and the Trading Platform," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 257-289, June.
    20. Tom Van Caneghem & Walter Aerts & Oveis Madadian, 2021. "Peer‐based comparison and firms' discretionary cost decisions," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(1), pages 163-185, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bco:mbraaa::v:5:y:2018:p:190-205. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sara Gunen (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.