IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/arp/tjssrr/2019p830-837.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Behavioral Factors that Cause Student Academic Fraud

Author

Listed:
  • Noer Sasongko*

    (Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Indonesia)

  • Mahruf Noor Hasyim

    (Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Indonesia)

  • Dahlia Fernandez

    (Faculty of Technology Management and Business, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn, Malaysia)

Abstract

This study aims to examine a number of behavioral factors from students committing academic fraud in university. The subject of this research is the factors that motivate students to commit academic fraud. The Fraud Pentagon Theory and Gone Theory are used. Behavioral factors include arrogance, pressure, opportunity, rationalization, competence, greed, need, and exposure. The population in this study was the undergraduate students in the Accounting Study Program in the Faculty of Economics and Business at Surakarta Muhammadiyah University who had taken courses in Accounting Information Systems and Auditing. This study uses the convenience sampling method as the sampling technique. There were 110 respondents involved. In this study, the hypothesis is subjected to the multiple linear regression analysis.The results of this study show that the factors related to student academic fraud are mainly arrogance and opportunity. Other behavioral factors namely pressure, rationalization, competence, greed, need, and exposure have no effect on student academic fraud.

Suggested Citation

  • Noer Sasongko* & Mahruf Noor Hasyim & Dahlia Fernandez, 2019. "Analysis of Behavioral Factors that Cause Student Academic Fraud," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 5(3), pages 830-837, 03-2019.
    • Handle: RePEc:arp:tjssrr:2019:p:830-837
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/pdf-files/jssr5(3)830-837.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/journal/7/archive/03-2019/3/5
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xin Guo, 2011. "Understanding Student Plagiarism: An Empirical Study in Accounting Education," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 17-37.
    2. Neil Granitz & Dana Loewy, 2007. "Applying Ethical Theories: Interpreting and Responding to Student Plagiarism," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 72(3), pages 293-306, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Analisa Analisa, 2020. "Factors influencing unethical behaviour in banking industry," Journal of Contemporary Accounting, Master in Accounting Program, Faculty of Business & Economics, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, vol. 2(2), pages 97-107, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lillian Y. Fok & Dinah M. Payne & Christy M. Corey, 2016. "Cultural Values, Utilitarian Orientation, and Ethical Decision Making: A Comparison of U.S. and Puerto Rican Professionals," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 134(2), pages 263-279, March.
    2. Anne Christensen & Jane Cote & Claire Kamm Latham, 2018. "Developing Ethical Confidence: The Impact of Action-Oriented Ethics Instruction in an Accounting Curriculum," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 153(4), pages 1157-1175, December.
    3. Joan Ballantine & Patricia McCourt Larres, 2012. "Perceptions of Authorial Identity in Academic Writing among Undergraduate Accounting Students: Implications for Unintentional Plagiarism," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(3), pages 289-306, October.
    4. Muhammad Rhies Khan & Mustaghis-Ur Rahman & Anita Laila & Ali Gohar & Sana Azhar, 2023. "Maintaining Business Ethics during COVID-19 Pandemic in Globalized World: A Comparison of Ethical Theories and Future Research Perspective," Journal of Economic Impact, Science Impact Publishers, vol. 5(1), pages 42-49.
    5. Sandra Scott, 2017. "From Plagiarism‐Plagued to Plagiarism‐Proof: Using Anonymized Case Assignments in Intermediate Accounting," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(4), pages 247-268, December.
    6. Apostolou, Barbara & Dorminey, Jack W. & Hassell, John M. & Watson, Stephanie F., 2013. "Accounting education literature review (2010–2012)," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 107-161.
    7. Singh, Anil & Mangalaraj, George & Taneja, Aakash, 2011. "An approach to detecting plagiarism in spreadsheet assignments: A digital answer to digital cheating," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 142-152.
    8. Daniela Sorea & Gheorghe Roșculeț & Ana-Maria Bolborici, 2021. "Readymade Solutions and Students’ Appetite for Plagiarism as Challenges for Online Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-16, March.
    9. Cam Caldwell, 2010. "A Ten-Step Model for Academic Integrity: A Positive Approach for Business Schools," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 92(1), pages 1-13, March.
    10. Ballantine, J.A. & McCourt Larres, P. & Mulgrew, M., 2014. "Determinants of academic cheating behavior: The future for accountancy in Ireland," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 55-66.
    11. Octavian RUJOIU & Valentina RUJOIU, 2014. "Academic Dishonesty And Workplace Dishonesty. An Overview," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 8(1), pages 928-938, November.
    12. Joanne Jones & Gary Spraakman, 2011. "A Case of Academic Misconduct: Does Self‐Interest Rule?," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(1), pages 1-22, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arp:tjssrr:2019:p:830-837. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Managing Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arpgweb.com/?ic=journal&journal=7&info=aims .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.