IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.2016.303180_7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Peer Support for the Hardly Reached: A Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Sokol, R.
  • Fisher, E.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Health disparities are aggravated when prevention and care initiatives fail to reach those they are intended to help. Groups can be classified as hardly reached according to a variety of circumstances that fall into 3 domains: individual (e.g., psychological factors), demographic (e.g., socioeconomic status), and cultural-environmental (e.g., social network). Several reports have indicated that peer support is an effective means of reaching hardly reached individuals. However, no review has explored peer support effectiveness in relation to the circumstances associated with being hardly reached or across diverse health problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Sokol, R. & Fisher, E., 2016. "Peer Support for the Hardly Reached: A Systematic Review," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 106(7), pages 1-8.
    • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2016.303180_7
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303180
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303180
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303180?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wallace, Carolyn & Farmer, Jane & McCosker, Anthony, 2019. "Boundary spanning practices of community connectors for engaging ‘hardly reached’ people in health services," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 366-373.
    2. Anna Price & Siân de Bell & Naomi Shaw & Alison Bethel & Rob Anderson & Jo Thompson Coon, 2022. "What is the volume, diversity and nature of recent, robust evidence for the use of peer support in health and social care? An evidence and gap map," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(3), September.
    3. Mullard, Jordan C.R. & Kawalek, Jessica & Parkin, Amy & Rayner, Clare & Mir, Ghazala & Sivan, Manoj & Greenhalgh, Trisha, 2023. "Towards evidence-based and inclusive models of peer support for long covid: A hermeneutic systematic review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 320(C).
    4. Reham Shalaby & Pamela Spurvey & Michelle Knox & Rebecca Rathwell & Wesley Vuong & Shireen Surood & Liana Urichuk & Mark Snaterse & Andrew J. Greenshaw & Xin-Min Li & Vincent I. O. Agyapong, 2022. "Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation Measures for Patients Discharged from Acute Psychiatric Care: Four-Arm Peer and Text Messaging Support Controlled Observational Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-14, March.
    5. Kia, Hannah & MacKinnon, Kinnon Ross & Abramovich, Alex & Bonato, Sarah, 2021. "Peer support as a protective factor against suicide in trans populations: A scoping review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    6. Laura K. Bech & Camilla Borch Jacobsen & Anne Sophie Mathiesen & Thordis Thomsen, 2019. "Preferring to manage by myself: A qualitative study of the perspectives of hardly reached people with type 2 diabetes on social support for diabetes management," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(9-10), pages 1889-1898, May.
    7. Feldman, Matthew B. & Tran, Trang T. & Boucher, Lisa M. & Abdelqader, Faisal & Raker, Amanda R. & Hile, Stephen J., 2023. "A process and impact evaluation of a peer-led HIV self-management program," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    8. Bourke, Lisa & Mitchell, Olivia & Mohamed Shaburdin, Zubaidah & Malatzky, Christina & Anam, Mujibul & Farmer, Jane, 2021. "Building readiness for inclusive practice in mainstream health services: A pre-inclusion framework to deconstruct exclusion," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    9. Tricia K Gatlin & Reimund Serafica & Michael Johnson, 2017. "Systematic review of peer education intervention programmes among individuals with type 2 diabetes," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4212-4222, December.
    10. Aliza Moledina & Olivia Magwood & Eric Agbata & Jui‐Hsia Hung & Ammar Saad & Kednapa Thavorn & Ginetta Salvalaggio & Gary Bloch & David Ponka & Tim Aubry & Claire Kendall & Kevin Pottie, 2021. "A comprehensive review of prioritised interventions to improve the health and wellbeing of persons with lived experience of homelessness," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(2), June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2016.303180_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.