IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/apb/japsss/2018p69-78.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Screening of anticholinesterase activity of alkaloids from extracts of ten selected indigenous plants in Mindanao

Author

Listed:
  • Ferlien Mae Brieta

    (University of the Immaculate Conception, Davao City, Philippines)

  • John Bryan Ruba

    (University of the Immaculate Conception, Davao City, Philippines)

  • Sema Esnaira

    (University of the Immaculate Conception, Davao City, Philippines)

  • Silkay Pabio

    (University of the Immaculate Conception, Davao City, Philippines)

  • Vivien Leigh Mina

    (University of the Immaculate Conception, Davao City, Philippines)

Abstract

This study was done with the intent to screen the acetylcholinesterase activity of alkaloids from plant extracts of ten selected indigenous plants in Mindanao. Determination of the functional groups which may attribute to the anticholinesterase activity was done using the Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR). The presence of nitrogen, carbonyl group, hydroxyl groups and aromatic rings were found in Costus speciosus, Euphorbia hirta, Ipomoea aquatica and Mimosa pudica. The results of acute oral toxicity test show that at 2000mg/kg, Costus speciosus, Euphorbia hirta, Ipomoea aquatica and Mimosa pudica extracts are classi􀅭ied as Category 5: practically non-toxic based on the Globally Harmonised System [1]. Another purpose of this study is to acquire the Approximate Inhibitory Concentration (AIC50) of the extracts using the Ellman method to determine the% inhibition at concentrations logarithmically determined and linear regression was used to calculate the AIC50. The AIC50 of C. speciosus, E. hirta, I. aquatica and M.pudica extracts are 4.18 mg/mL, 3.74 mg/mL, 3.68 mg/mL, 4.18 mg/mL, respectively and their corresponding AIC50 range are 3.13-5.23 mg/mL, 2.81-4.68 mg/mL, 2.76-4.60 mg/mL and 3.13-5.23 mg/mL. Furthermore, the AIC50 of the plant extracts were compared statistically with the positive control (Donepezil), to know if there is a signi􀅭icant difference. Results show that the signi􀅭icant value 0.287 is greater than α = .05 (2-tailed). The researchers failed to reject the null hypotheses that there is no signi􀅭icant AIC50 difference between of C. speciosus, E. hirta, I. aquatica and M. pudica extracts and the positive control, Donepezil. Hence, the anticholinesterase activity of the plant extracts are comparable with the anticholinesterase activity of positive control, Donepezil.

Suggested Citation

  • Ferlien Mae Brieta & John Bryan Ruba & Sema Esnaira & Silkay Pabio & Vivien Leigh Mina, 2018. "Screening of anticholinesterase activity of alkaloids from extracts of ten selected indigenous plants in Mindanao," Journal of Applied and Physical Sciences, Prof. Vakhrushev Alexander, vol. 4(2), pages 69-78.
  • Handle: RePEc:apb:japsss:2018:p:69-78
    DOI: 10.20474/japs-4.2.4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://tafpublications.com/platform/Articles/full-japs4.2.4.php
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://tafpublications.com/gip_content/paper/Japs-4.2.4.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.20474/japs-4.2.4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Morrissey, J. & Meyrick, B. & Sivaraman, D. & Horne, R.E. & Berry, M., 2013. "Cost-benefit assessment of energy efficiency investments: Accounting for future resources, savings and risks in the Australian residential sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 148-159.
    2. Sucitra Melani & Emytri & Resi Natalia Turnip & Baiq Qurrata Aini, 2015. "The Forming of Standard Operating Procedures for Non-Prescription Drugs Service in Apotek Keluarga Bekasi," International Journal of Health and Medical Sciences, Mohammad A. H. Khan, vol. 1(3), pages 57-64.
    3. A. Sathiya Susuman, 2017. "Mental Health Issues and Policy in Sub Saharan Africa: A view from Cape Town to Cairo," International Journal of Health and Medical Sciences, Mohammad A. H. Khan, vol. 3(3), pages 59-66.
    4. Emmanuel Manu & Mohlomi Jafta Ntsaba, 2016. "Perceptions of marijuana use: Chronicles of marijuana smokers from two marijuana-Growing communities in South Africa," Journal of Advances in Health and Medical Sciences, Balachandar S. Sayapathi, vol. 2(3), pages 82-91.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yushchenko, Alisa & Patel, Martin Kumar, 2017. "Cost-effectiveness of energy efficiency programs: How to better understand and improve from multiple stakeholder perspectives?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 538-550.
    2. Häckel, Björn & Pfosser, Stefan & Tränkler, Timm, 2017. "Explaining the energy efficiency gap - Expected Utility Theory versus Cumulative Prospect Theory," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 414-426.
    3. Otrachshenko, Vladimir & Hartwell, Christopher A. & Popova, Olga, 2023. "Energy efficiency, market competition, and quality certification: Lessons from Central Asia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    4. Baldoni, Edoardo & Coderoni, Silvia & D'Orazio, Marco & Di Giuseppe, Elisa & Esposti, Roberto, 2019. "The role of economic and policy variables in energy-efficient retrofitting assessment. A stochastic Life Cycle Costing methodology," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 1207-1219.
    5. Kang, Heejae & Kim, Yoori & Lee, Jungbae & Baek, Jungho, 2022. "Estimating the cost of saving electricity of energy efficiency programs: A case study of South Korea," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    6. Krarti, Moncef & Dubey, Kankana & Howarth, Nicholas, 2019. "Energy productivity analysis framework for buildings: a case study of GCC region," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 1251-1265.
    7. Zoran Pučko & Damjan Maučec & Nataša Šuman, 2020. "Energy and Cost Analysis of Building Envelope Components Using BIM: A Systematic Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-24, May.
    8. Deng, Qianli & Jiang, Xianglin & Zhang, Limao & Cui, Qingbin, 2015. "Making optimal investment decisions for energy service companies under uncertainty: A case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 234-243.
    9. Salasiah Hanin Hamjah* & Izzah Nur Aida Zur Raffar & Rosmawati Mohamad Rasit & Zuliza Mohd Kusrin, 2019. "Adolescent’s Perception of Father’s Leadership Style in the Family," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 5(2), pages 284-290, 02-2019.
    10. Cremer, Leo & Weber, Christine, 2022. "Deep energy retrofits: How effective and robust are policy instruments?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    11. Brandão de Vasconcelos, Ana & Cabaço, António & Pinheiro, Manuel Duarte & Manso, Armando, 2016. "The impact of building orientation and discount rates on a Portuguese reference building refurbishment decision," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 329-340.
    12. Copiello, Sergio & Gabrielli, Laura & Bonifaci, Pietro, 2017. "Evaluation of energy retrofit in buildings under conditions of uncertainty: The prominence of the discount rate," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 104-117.
    13. Foran, Tira & Fleming, David & Spandonide, Bruno & Williams, Rachel & Race, Digby, 2016. "Understanding energy-related regimes: A participatory approach from central Australia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 315-324.
    14. Mahesh Bhatt, 2019. "The ‘Thought Model’ of Spirituality to Solve Conflicts in Training and Education of Spiritual Health in Modern Public Healthcare Systems," International Journal of Health and Medical Sciences, Mohammad A. H. Khan, vol. 5(1), pages 29-34.
    15. Vivian W. Y. Tam & Khoa N. Le & J. Y. Wang, 2018. "Cost Implication of Implementing External Facade Systems for Commercial Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-22, June.
    16. Zuo, Jian & Pullen, Stephen & Rameezdeen, Raufdeen & Bennetts, Helen & Wang, Yuan & Mao, Guozhu & Zhou, Zhihua & Du, Huibin & Duan, Huabo, 2017. "Green building evaluation from a life-cycle perspective in Australia: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 358-368.
    17. Rout, Auroshis & Sahoo, Sudhansu S. & Thomas, Sanju, 2018. "Risk modeling of domestic solar water heater using Monte Carlo simulation for east-coastal region of India," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 548-556.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:apb:japsss:2018:p:69-78. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Prof. Vakhrushev Alexander (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://tafpublications.com/platform/published_papers/11 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.