IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Environmental Claims And Advertisement Effectiveness: An Experimental Study On Print Advertisements

Listed author(s):
  • Umit Alnıacık
  • Cengiz Yilmaz
  • Esra Alnıacık


    (Gebze Institute of Technology
    Bogaziçi University
    Kocaeli University)

The study investigates the effects of environmental claims and claim specificity on advertisement effectiveness. An experimental study is conducted using hypothetical print advertisements for three product categories, namely laundry machines, wrist watches, and DVD players. Findings indicate that the existence of environmental claims significantly improves respondent evaluations in the wrist watches and DVD players categories, whereas in the laundry machines category no such effects are observed. In addition, advertising claim specificity (using vague versus specific claims) significantly improves consumer evaluations of DVD players but does not seem to exert significant effects on evaluations of laundry machines and wrist watches. Theoretical and managerial implications of these findings are discussed.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Article provided by Anadolu University in its journal Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences.

Volume (Year): 10 (2010)
Issue (Month): 1 (January)
Pages: 85-106

in new window

Handle: RePEc:and:journl:v:10:y:2010:i:1:p:85-106
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Yunus Emre Kampusu 26470, Eskişehir

Phone: (90) (222) 335-0580 x 2743
Fax: (90) (222) 320-1304
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:and:journl:v:10:y:2010:i:1:p:85-106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Social Sciences Institute)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.