IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ami/journl/v11y2012i1p97-111.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assurance on the Reliability of Mobile Payment System and Its Effects on Its’ Use: An Empirical Examination

Author

Listed:
  • Priyanka MEHARIA

    () (Eastern Michigan University, United States of America)

Abstract

Mobile Payment Systems (MPS) such as Google Wallet are an emerging technology. This paper examines if mobile assurance as provided by examining the five criteria, namely security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality and privacy (as per the Trust Framework by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA)) has any relationship with use of MPS. The theory used for this study is technology acceptance model (TAM). Some new measures were developed and validated. The data was collected by a survey and Structure Equation Model was used to analyze the data collected. The results of the study indicated that security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality and privacy has a positive relation with the attitude towards use mobile payment system. The results of the study data suggest that mobile assurance using any of the trust services correctly predict the intention to use such Mobile payment systems. The contribution of this study is that this paper extends the TAM model to include the trust framework with an emerging technology such as MPS. Another contribution of this study is to provide empirical support in favor of engagements to provide assurance on the reliability of mobile payment system by public accounting firms and practitioners (using any of the Trust Services Principles and Criteria) to have a positive impact of its use.

Suggested Citation

  • Priyanka MEHARIA, 2012. "Assurance on the Reliability of Mobile Payment System and Its Effects on Its’ Use: An Empirical Examination," Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 11(1), pages 97-111, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:ami:journl:v:11:y:2012:i:1:p:97-111
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cig.ase.ro/articles/11_1_6.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Webtrust; Systrust; Mobile payment systems; Mobile Assurance; Trust; Reliability;

    JEL classification:

    • M15 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - IT Management

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ami:journl:v:11:y:2012:i:1:p:97-111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Cristina Tartavulea). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.