IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aiy/jnljtr/v4y2018i3p250-265.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on tax risks in the development of the New Silk Road

Author

Listed:
  • Ma Caichen
  • Shan Miao

Abstract

The paper is studying the tax risks of the Silk Road Economic Belt. Since President Xi Jinping proposed an initiative to jointly build the Silk Road Economic Belt in 2013 when he visited Kazakhstan, the process of regional cooperation on the Silk Road Economic Belt has been further accelerated. With the advancement of the economic and trade exchanges between China and the 16 countries along Silk Road, tax distribution relations have become complicated, and tax risks become an important issue that cannot be ignored. Based on the theory of international tax and using the comparative analysis and empirical analysis, the paper firstly studies the spatial scope of the Silk Road Economic Belt and the institutional environment of the countries along the route, and then mainly analyzes tax risks in the development of the Silk Road Economic Belt and their sources. The study has revealed that there exist large differences in the tax system among the 16 countries along the Silk Road and poor coordination in the tax system, especially in respect of corporate income tax. Coupled with the influence of language barriers, it is difficult for countries to grasp each other’s taxation policies and regulations in a timely and comprehensive manner. Finally, the paper proposes the path to prevent the risks of the Silk Road Economic Belt. The main conclusions are: the countries along the Silk Road Economic Belt have hugely different tax system and incomplete tax treaty system, implying big risks for Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS); the risk sources are that lack of tax collection and management capacity to adapt to international tax rules, and neither enterprises nor tax service departments pay due attention to tax risks; the countries along the Silk Road Economic Belt should optimize open and friendly taxation policies, promote tax coordination, and improve tax collection and management capacities to prevent tax risks

Suggested Citation

  • Ma Caichen & Shan Miao, 2018. "Research on tax risks in the development of the New Silk Road," Journal of Tax Reform, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 4(3), pages 250-265.
  • Handle: RePEc:aiy:jnljtr:v:4:y:2018:i:3:p:250-265
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15826/jtr.2018.4.3.055
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://jtr.urfu.ru/fileadmin/user_upload/site_15907/main/Ma_Caichen_Shan_Miao.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/http://dx.doi.org/10.15826/jtr.2018.4.3.055?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:idq:ictduk:12802 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Du, Julan & Zhang, Yifei, 2018. "Does One Belt One Road initiative promote Chinese overseas direct investment?," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 189-205.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Yishuang & Liu, Wei & Zhang, Xiaoling & Dong, Hanmin & Zhao, Zhihui & Zhang, Zhan, 2024. "Domestic environmental impacts of OFDI: City-level evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 89(PA), pages 391-409.
    2. Xiaobing Yu & Hong Chen & Chenliang Li, 2019. "Evaluate Typhoon Disasters in 21st Century Maritime Silk Road by Super-Efficiency DEA," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-10, May.
    3. Xiao, Zhaohua & Du, Limin & Wang, Zheng, 2023. "The Belt, the Road, and the carbon emissions in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    4. Damoah, Kaku Attah & Giovannetti, Giorgia & Marvasi, Enrico, 2022. "Do country centrality and similarity to China matter in the allocation of belt and road projects?," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 660-674.
    5. Krishna Chaitanya Vadlamannati & Yuanxin Li & Samuel Brazys & Alexander Dukalskis, 2019. "Building Bridges or Breaking Bonds? The Belt and Road Initiative and Foreign Aid Competition," Working Papers 201906, Geary Institute, University College Dublin.
    6. Shahid Mahmood & Ghaffar Ali & Rashid Menhas & Muazzam Sabir, 2022. "Belt and road initiative as a catalyst of infrastructure development: Assessment of resident’s perception and attitude towards China-Pakistan Economic Corridor," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(7), pages 1-22, July.
    7. Wang, Hao & Han, Yonghui & Fidrmuc, Jan & Wei, Dongming, 2021. "Confucius Institute, Belt and Road Initiative, and Internationalization," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 237-256.
    8. Guoli Chen & Jiyang Dong & Jinshuai Hu & Feida Zhang, 2024. "Regulatory institutional misalignment and cross-border acquisitions: evidence from an emerging-market country," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 55(2), pages 172-193, March.
    9. Razzaq, Asif & An, Hui & Delpachitra, Sarath, 2021. "Does technology gap increase FDI spillovers on productivity growth? Evidence from Chinese outward FDI in Belt and Road host countries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    10. Tianxu Jiang & Min Zhu, 2021. "The impact of innovation on companies’ cross-border mergers and acquisitions: evidence from China," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 969-991, June.
    11. Zhang, Zhuo & Zhao, Yongliang & Cai, Haiya & Ajaz, Tahseen, 2023. "Influence of renewable energy infrastructure, Chinese outward FDI, and technical efficiency on ecological sustainability in belt and road node economies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 608-616.
    12. Qipeng Sun & Xiaodong Zhang & Xiaoqing Xu & Qi Yang & Sijie Wang, 2019. "Does the “Belt and Road Initiative” Promote the Economic Growth of Participating Countries?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-14, September.
    13. Tielin Gao & Sanggyun Na & Xiaohan Dang & Yongli Zhang, 2018. "Study of the Competitiveness of Quanzhou Port on the Belt and Road in China Based on a Fuzzy-AHP and ELECTRE III Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, April.
    14. Weiwei Xiao & Qihang Xue & Xing Yi, 2023. "Does the Belt and Road Initiative promote international innovation cooperation?," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, December.
    15. Jakub Horak, 2021. "Sanctions as a Catalyst for Russia’s and China’s Balance of Trade: Business Opportunity," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-26, January.
    16. Henglong Zhang & Yitong Jiang & Conglei Hou, 2024. "How Does the “Belt and Road” Initiative Affect Debt Sustainability?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-24, November.
    17. Jiang, Qichuan & Ma, Xuejiao & Wang, Yun, 2021. "How does the one belt one road initiative affect the green economic growth?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    18. Qizhen Wang & Rong Wang & Suxia Liu, 2024. "The reverse technology spillover effect of outward foreign direct investment, energy efficiency and carbon emissions," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(7), pages 17013-17035, July.
    19. Zhao, Yabo & Liu, Xiaofeng & Wang, Shaojian & Ge, Yuejing, 2019. "Energy relations between China and the countries along the Belt and Road: An analysis of the distribution of energy resources and interdependence relationships," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 133-144.
    20. Junaid Ashraf, 2024. "How do institutional factors affect sustainable development? A comparative analysis," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 1-24, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aiy:jnljtr:v:4:y:2018:i:3:p:250-265. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Natalia Starodubets (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/seurfru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.