IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/quaest/392439.html

Product management and the construction of the required software: the case of the Commercial Agreements module

Author

Listed:
  • Azevêdo, Livyson Saymon Leão

Abstract

This article describes an applied research conducted in a technology company. The project addresses the adoption of product management within the context of software engineering, analyzing changes in environment and work dynamics resulting from this adoption. The goal was to understand how the management of software products in the Agreements Module is transforming the software engineering of a technology company, working on the uncertainties pertinent to the product at the implementation phase, avoiding the mismatch of information that ends up causing the nondelivery of the products, failing customer requirements, and creating unrealistic schedules and budgets. The purpose of this work was to contribute to the area of ​​technology by producing content for a branch not yet explored in academia, as it is experiencing great growth in the labor market. The cohort of this research was ten professionals from Agreements squad: five developers, one design analyst, one quality analyst, one product manager, one agile coach and one coordinator. Through surveys applied to the end user and to the team involved in the development, it was possible to assess the level of satisfaction within the process and the product delivered. Throughout the article, it is possible to observe the importance of product management in the production of software; as when implemented in a planned and integrated way, it can bring profits and avoid rework.

Suggested Citation

  • Azevêdo, Livyson Saymon Leão, 2021. "Product management and the construction of the required software: the case of the Commercial Agreements module," Quaestum, University of Sao Paulo, vol. 2.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:quaest:392439
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/392439/files/561-Texto%20do%20artigo-2657-2958-10-20211220.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Herbert A. Simon, 1996. "The Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd Edition," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262691914, December.
    2. Ronald N. Kostoff, 2001. "The metrics of science and technology," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 50(2), pages 353-361, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alan Hevner & Isabelle Comyn-Wattiau & Jacky Akoka & Nicolas Prat, 2018. "A pragmatic approach for identifying and managing design science research goals and evaluation criteria," Post-Print hal-02283783, HAL.
    2. Aron Lindberg & Nicholas Berente & James Gaskin & Kalle Lyytinen, 2016. "Coordinating Interdependencies in Online Communities: A Study of an Open Source Software Project," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 751-772, December.
    3. Nadia Fiorino & Emma Galli & Ilde Rizzo & Marco Valente, 2023. "Public procurement and reputation. An agent‐based model," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(4), pages 806-832, November.
    4. Tobias Knabke & Sebastian Olbrich, 2018. "Building novel capabilities to enable business intelligence agility: results from a quantitative study," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 493-546, August.
    5. Karén Hovhannisian & Marco Valente, 2005. "Modeling Directed Local Search Strategies on Technology," Computational Economics 0507001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Sunder Shyam, 2011. "Imagined Worlds of Accounting," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 1(1), pages 1-14, January.
    7. Fiori Stefano, 2005. "The emergence of instructions : some open problems in Hayek's theory," CESMEP Working Papers 200504, University of Turin.
    8. T. Ciarli & R. Leoncini & S. Montresor & M. Valente, 2007. "Organisation of industry and innovation dynamics," Working Papers 609, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    9. McCown, R. L., 2002. "Changing systems for supporting farmers' decisions: problems, paradigms, and prospects," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 74(1), pages 179-220, October.
    10. Jin P. Gerlach & Ronald T. Cenfetelli, 2022. "Overcoming the Single-IS Paradigm in Individual-Level IS Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 476-488, June.
    11. Basile, Luigi Jesus & Carbonara, Nunzia & Pellegrino, Roberta & Panniello, Umberto, 2023. "Business intelligence in the healthcare industry: The utilization of a data-driven approach to support clinical decision making," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    12. Loris Gaio, 2005. "A diversity-based approach to requirements tracing in new product development," ROCK Working Papers 031, Department of Computer and Management Sciences, University of Trento, Italy, revised 13 Jun 2008.
    13. François-Xavier De Vaujany & Amaury Grimand, 2005. "Moving towards appropriability of academic knowledge: a post-actionalist perspective," Post-Print hal-04476524, HAL.
    14. Ahmed Abbasi & Jeffrey Parsons & Gautam Pant & Olivia R. Liu Sheng & Suprateek Sarker, 2024. "Pathways for Design Research on Artificial Intelligence," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 441-459, June.
    15. Ronald K. Mitchell & Lowell Busenitz & Theresa Lant & Patricia P. McDougall & Eric A. Morse & J. Brock Smith, 2004. "The Distinctive and Inclusive Domain of Entrepreneurial Cognition Research," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 28(6), pages 505-518, November.
    16. B. A. Huberman & N. S. Glance, "undated". "Diversity and Collective Action," Working Papers _001, Xerox Research Park.
    17. Venkat Ram Reddy Ganuthula, 2025. "AI-enabled individual entrepreneurship theory: redefining scale, capability, and sustainability in the digital age," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 1-21, December.
    18. Zhewei Zhang & Youngjin Yoo & Kalle Lyytinen & Aron Lindberg, 2021. "The Unknowability of Autonomous Tools and the Liminal Experience of Their Use," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 1192-1213, December.
    19. Geerts, Guido L., 2011. "A design science research methodology and its application to accounting information systems research," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 142-151.
    20. Gernot Liedtke & Hanno Friedrich, 2012. "Generation of logistics networks in freight transportation models," Transportation, Springer, vol. 39(6), pages 1335-1351, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:quaest:392439. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dauspbr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.