IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/pojard/356172.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technical efficiency of maize-based farm irrigators in the Eastern Cape province: a stochastic frontier model approach

Author

Listed:
  • Mdoda, Lelethu
  • Ajuruchukwu, Obi
  • Mzuyanda, Christian
  • Phiwe, Jiba

Abstract

Maize production is the most important field crop in South Africa. It has been produced from ancient years, with Mpumalanga and North West Provinces being principal producers. Maize is a widely produced and dominant ground crop because it is resistant, requires less labour, is rich in nutritional power and starch, grows relatively fast and is easily cultivated like other ground crops. Most of the maize produced in South Africa is consumed domestically. Despite the vast tracts of arable land and the universal land reform that has been implemented for 25 years, farmers in South Africa’s former homelands cultivate only small food plots on which they primarily cultivate maize and a small number of vegetables. The objective of this study was to investigate the technical efficiency of maize farmers under small-scale irrigation systems. A multi-stage sampling procedure was used to select 120 maize farmers. The study used the STATA 15 program for analysis and utilised descriptive statistics and a stochastic production front model. Maize production in the study area was dominated by men (78%) with an average age of 60 years and an average family size of 4 persons per household. Smallholder irrigators have primary education, which means that they can read and interpret agricultural information. Farmers have at least ten years of agricultural experience on average. Taking into consideration high farm productivity, smallholder maize-based farmers were efficient in their use of resources. The allocative use of resources such as farm size, farm labour, fertiliser and seeds led to the identification of the optimum level of efficiency for the cultivation of maize. The level of technical efficiency for maize cultivation was 84%, indicating that 16% of the maize crop was not utilized by smallholder maize-based farmers in the study area. The study suggests that the Government and the private sector should improve agricultural techniques such as manure and improved seeds that are prepared early and available at a small and affordable cost to increase maize productivity.

Suggested Citation

  • Mdoda, Lelethu & Ajuruchukwu, Obi & Mzuyanda, Christian & Phiwe, Jiba, 2021. "Technical efficiency of maize-based farm irrigators in the Eastern Cape province: a stochastic frontier model approach," Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development, University of Life Sciences, Poznan, Poland, vol. 62(4), April.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:pojard:356172
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.356172
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/356172/files/Technical%20efficiency%20of%20maize-based%20farm%20irrigators%20in%20the%20Eastern%20Cape%20province.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.356172?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ajuruchukwu Obi & Balogun Taofeek Ayodeji, 2020. "Determinants of Economic Farm-Size–Efficiency Relationship in Smallholder Maize Farms in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-18, April.
    2. Mdoda, Lelethu & Ajuruchukwu, Obi & Mzuyanda, Christian & Phiwe, Jiba, 2021. "Technical efficiency of maize-based farm irrigators in the Eastern Cape province: a stochastic frontier model approach," Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development, University of Life Sciences, Poznan, Poland, vol. 62(4), April.
    3. Nyarai M. Mujuru & Ajuruchukwu Obi, 2020. "Effects of Cultivated Area on Smallholder Farm Profits and Food Security in Rural Communities of the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mdoda, Lelethu & Ajuruchukwu, Obi & Mzuyanda, Christian & Phiwe, Jiba, 2021. "Technical efficiency of maize-based farm irrigators in the Eastern Cape province: a stochastic frontier model approach," Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development, University of Life Sciences, Poznan, Poland, vol. 62(4), April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lelethu Mdoda & Ajuruchukwu Obi & Zoleka Ncoyini-Manciya & Mzuyanda Christian & Anele Mayekiso, 2022. "Assessment of Profit Efficiency for Spinach Production under Small-Scale Irrigated Agriculture in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Nkhubedu Magakwe & Oluwasogo Olorunfemi, 2024. "A Systematic Review of the Trends, Effects, and Deterrents of Collective Marketing Participation Among Smallholder Farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-13, November.
    3. Nyarai M. Mujuru & Ajuruchukwu Obi, 2020. "Effects of Cultivated Area on Smallholder Farm Profits and Food Security in Rural Communities of the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, April.
    4. Mahali Elizabeth Lesala & Nyarai Mujuru & Lelethu Mdoda & Ajuruchukwu Obi, 2025. "Evaluating the Economic Impact of Market Participation on the Well-Being of Smallholder Irrigators: Evidence from the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-23, April.
    5. Louisa J.M. Jansen & Patrick P. Kalas, 2020. "Improving Governance of Tenure in Policy and Practice: A Conceptual Basis to Analyze Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships for Multi-Stakeholder Transformative Governance Illustrated with an Example from Sou," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-30, November.
    6. Shackleton, Ross T., 2020. "Loss of land and livelihoods from mining operations: A case in the Limpopo Province, South Africa," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    7. Chukwujekwu A. Obianefo & John N. Ng’ombe & Agness Mzyece & Blessing Masasi & Ngozi J. Obiekwe & Oluchi O. Anumudu, 2021. "Technical Efficiency and Technological Gaps of Rice Production in Anambra State, Nigeria," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-13, December.
    8. Eliaza Mkuna & Edilegnaw Wale, 2022. "Explaining Farmers’ Income via Market Orientation and Participation: Evidence from KwaZulu-Natal (South Africa)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, October.
    9. Masithembe Sigigaba & Lelethu Mdoda & Asanda Mditshwa, 2021. "Adoption Drivers of Improved Open-Pollinated (OPVs) Maize Varieties by Smallholder Farmers in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-18, December.
    10. Mnqobi B. Njoko & Perpetua R. Mphahlele & Mashudu H. Mbulaheni, 2023. "Management and Sustainability of Small-Scale Agricultural Projects: A Case of Elias Motsoaledi Local Municipality, Limpopo Province, South Africa," Social Sciences and Education Research Review, Department of Communication, Journalism and Education Sciences, University of Craiova, vol. 10(2), pages 259-266, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pojard:356172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.jard.edu.pl/en/main .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.